Columna Vertebralis Hareketlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde İnklinometre ve Radyolojik Ölçümün Karşılaştırılması
Abstract
Omurga hareketleri bireylerin klinik, fiziksel ve fonksiyonel değerlendirilmesi sırasında sıklıkla ölçülebilmektedir. Bu hareketlerin ölçümü için tercih edilen araçlardan biri de inklinometrelerdir. Kas-iskelet sistemi değerlendirmesi için geçerli bilimsel yöntemlerin kullanılması gerektiği göz önüne alındığında, bu çalışmanın amacı, omurga hareketlerini ölçmek için inklinometrelerin geçerliliği hakkında bir literatür taraması yapmaktır. PubMed elektronik veri tabanında “inclinometer”, “spine”, “vertebrae” ve “columna vertebralis” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak arama yapılmıştır. Çalışma analizi süreci, başlıkların, özetlerin ve tam metinlerin okunmasını içermiştir. Belirlenen kriterler kontrol edildikten sonra, altı makale derlemeye dâhil edilme kriterlerini karşılamıştır. Dâhil edilen tüm çalışmalar, omurganın radyografik ölçümü ve inklinometre ile elde edilen açısal ölçümlerin bir arada incelendiği tasarım sunmaktadır. Kullanılan veri toplama yöntemlerinde ve çalışmaların sonuçlarında değişkenlik gözlemlenmiştir. İnklinometrelerin sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından bilimsel kanıtlara dayalı olarak kullanılması, bu araçların geçerlik çalışmalarında kullanılan sonuçları ve metodolojik yönlerinin dikkate alınması önerilmektedir.
Keywords
References
- 1. Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA, Parnianpour M. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine. 2001;26(1):53-60.
- 2. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Cross M, et al. Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability‐Adjusted Life Years Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders for 195 Countries and Territories 1990–2017. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2021;73(4):702-714.
- 3. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA. Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Pain physician. 2009;12(4):E35.
- 4. Vaisy M, Gizzi L, Petzke F, Consmüller T, Pfingsten M, Falla D. Measurement of lumbar spine functional movement in low back pain. The Clinical journal of pain. 2015;31(10):876-885.
- 5. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry: FA Davis; 2016.
- 6. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion: its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine. 1999;24(3):262-268.
- 7. Adams M, Dolan P, Marx C, Hutton W. An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. Clinical Biomechanics. 1986;1(3):130-134.
- 8. Barrett E, Lenehan B, O’sullivan K, Lewis J, McCreesh K. Validation of the manual inclinometer and flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2018;34(4):301-308.
- 9. Ghorbani F, Kamyab M, Azadinia F. Smartphone applications as a suitable alternative to CROM device and inclinometers in assessing the cervical range of motion in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2020;19(1):38-48.
- 10. Littlewood C, May S. Measurement of range of movement in the lumbar spine—what methods are valid? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(3):201-211.
- 11. Saur PM, Ensink F-BM, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine. 1996;21(11):1332-1338.
- 12. Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Gool JJ, Bernsen RM, Njoo KH. Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: is there an alternative to radiographs? Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2001;24(8):505-508.
- 13. McFarland C, Wang-Price S, Richard S. Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: A reliability and validity study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2015;28(2):295-302.
- 14. Hunter DJ, Rivett DA, McKiernan S, Weerasekara I, Snodgrass SJ. Is the inclinometer a valid measure of thoracic kyphosis? A cross-sectional study. Brazilian journal of physical therapy. 2018;22(4):310-317.
- 15. Hannink E, Dawes H, Shannon TM, Barker KL. Validity of sagittal thoracolumbar curvature measurement using a non-radiographic surface topography method. Spine Deformity. 2022:1-8.
- 16. Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G, Fırat T. The validity and reliability of “Spinal Mouse” assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. European spine journal. 2016;25(2):476-482.
- 17. Nattrass CL, Nitschke JE, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment: an investigation of validity. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1999;13(3):211-218.
- 18. Lunn DE, Lampropoulos A, Stewart TD. Basic biomechanics of the hip. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2016;30(3):239-246.
- 19. Mason D, Preece S, Bramah C, Herrington L. Reproducibility of kinematic measures of the thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvis during fast running. Gait & Posture. 2016;43:96-100.
- 20. Tian F, Tu L-Y, Gu W-F, et al. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(41).
Comparison of Inclinometer and Radiological Measurement in the Evaluation of Columna Vertebralis Movements
Abstract
Spinal movements can often be measured during clinical, physical and functional evaluation of individuals. One of the preferred tools for the measurement of these movements is inclinometers. Considering that valid scientific methods should be used for musculoskeletal assessment, the aim of this study is to conduct a literature review on the validity of inclinometers to measure spinal movements. The PubMed electronic database was searched using the keywords "inclinometer", "spine", "vertebrae" and "columna vertebralis". The study analysis process included reading titles, abstracts and full texts. After checking the established criteria, six articles met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The design of all included studies was a combination of radiographic measurement of the spine and angular measurements obtained by inclinometer. Variability was observed in the data collection methods used and the results of the studies. It is recommended that inclinometers be used by health professionals based on scientific evidence, and the results and methodological aspects used in validity studies of these tools should be taken into account.
References
- 1. Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA, Parnianpour M. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine. 2001;26(1):53-60.
- 2. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Cross M, et al. Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability‐Adjusted Life Years Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders for 195 Countries and Territories 1990–2017. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2021;73(4):702-714.
- 3. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA. Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Pain physician. 2009;12(4):E35.
- 4. Vaisy M, Gizzi L, Petzke F, Consmüller T, Pfingsten M, Falla D. Measurement of lumbar spine functional movement in low back pain. The Clinical journal of pain. 2015;31(10):876-885.
- 5. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry: FA Davis; 2016.
- 6. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion: its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine. 1999;24(3):262-268.
- 7. Adams M, Dolan P, Marx C, Hutton W. An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. Clinical Biomechanics. 1986;1(3):130-134.
- 8. Barrett E, Lenehan B, O’sullivan K, Lewis J, McCreesh K. Validation of the manual inclinometer and flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2018;34(4):301-308.
- 9. Ghorbani F, Kamyab M, Azadinia F. Smartphone applications as a suitable alternative to CROM device and inclinometers in assessing the cervical range of motion in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2020;19(1):38-48.
- 10. Littlewood C, May S. Measurement of range of movement in the lumbar spine—what methods are valid? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(3):201-211.
- 11. Saur PM, Ensink F-BM, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine. 1996;21(11):1332-1338.
- 12. Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Gool JJ, Bernsen RM, Njoo KH. Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: is there an alternative to radiographs? Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2001;24(8):505-508.
- 13. McFarland C, Wang-Price S, Richard S. Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: A reliability and validity study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2015;28(2):295-302.
- 14. Hunter DJ, Rivett DA, McKiernan S, Weerasekara I, Snodgrass SJ. Is the inclinometer a valid measure of thoracic kyphosis? A cross-sectional study. Brazilian journal of physical therapy. 2018;22(4):310-317.
- 15. Hannink E, Dawes H, Shannon TM, Barker KL. Validity of sagittal thoracolumbar curvature measurement using a non-radiographic surface topography method. Spine Deformity. 2022:1-8.
- 16. Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G, Fırat T. The validity and reliability of “Spinal Mouse” assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. European spine journal. 2016;25(2):476-482.
- 17. Nattrass CL, Nitschke JE, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment: an investigation of validity. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1999;13(3):211-218.
- 18. Lunn DE, Lampropoulos A, Stewart TD. Basic biomechanics of the hip. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2016;30(3):239-246.
- 19. Mason D, Preece S, Bramah C, Herrington L. Reproducibility of kinematic measures of the thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvis during fast running. Gait & Posture. 2016;43:96-100.
- 20. Tian F, Tu L-Y, Gu W-F, et al. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(41).
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Review |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2022 |
| Acceptance Date | November 4, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 31 Issue: 4 |
