Total diz artroplastisi hakkındaki çevrimiçi Türkçe ve İngilizce bilgi kalitesinin karşılaştırılması: kesit çalışması
Abstract
Amaç: İnternet, hastaların sağlık ile ilgili bilgilere ulaşmaları için en önemli kaynaklardan biri haline gelmiştir. İnternet kapsam ve teknoloji açısından gelişmeye devam ederken, buradaki bilgilerin ne denli kaliteli olduğu hakkında endişeler ortaya çıkmıştır. Amacımız, uzun süredir üzerinde çalışılmakta olan bu konu ile ilgili olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce internet sitelerindeki sağlıkla ilgili bilgilerin kalitesini karşılaştırmaktır.
Çalışma Planı: İngilizcede “total knee prosthesis” olarak geçen ve Türkçesi “total diz protezi” olan terimler Google’da aratıldı. Aramada çıkan ilk 30 sonuç, sağlık ile ilgili internet sitelerini erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik ve güvenilirlik açısından bilgi kalitesine göre puanlamak için tasarlanmış ve geçerliliği kanıtlanmış bir araç olan LIDA kullanılarak değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Türkçe ve İngilizce internet siteleri arasında erişilebilirlik açısından anlamlı fark saptanmasa da, Türkçe internet sitelerinin kullanılabilirlik ve güvenilirliğinin anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu görüldü. Türkçe internet sitelerindeki bilgilerin genel kalitesinin İngilizce internet siteleri ile karşılaştırıldığında kötü olduğunu gördük.
Çıkarımlar: Sağlıkla ilgili bilgilerin kalitesinin geliştirilmesi ve bu soruna dair bilinç oluşturulması için Türkçe internet sitelerinde daha fazla çalışma yapılmalıdır. Türkçe internet sitelerinde, internet sitelerinin sertifikasyon sistemlerini geliştirmek ve/veya mevcut sistemleri yaymaya yönelik teşvik edici girişimler gereklidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler : sağlık, internet, bilgi kalitesi, diz, LIDA, erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik, güvenilirlik
DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0291
Bu özet, makalenin henüz redaksiyonu tamamlanmamış haline aittir ve bilgi verme amaçlıdır. Yayın aşamasında değişiklik gösterebilir.
Keywords
Erişilebilirlik; sağlık; internet; diz; LIDA; güvenilirlik; kullanılabilirlik; bilgilerin kalitesi
References
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Internet Project. 13 Jan. 2013. Cited 2 Apr. 2014. Avail- able from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia// Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf.
- Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Son üç ay içinde internet kul- lanan bireylerin interneti kişisel kullanma amaçları verisi. Istatistiksel Tablolar ve Dinamik Sorgulama, Hanehalki Bilisim Teknolojileri Kullanim Arastirmasi; 2013. Avail- able from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_ id=1028.
- Frémont P, Labrecque M, Légaré F, Baillargeon L, Mis- son L. Evaluation of medical web sites. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of an evaluation tool. [Article in French] Can Fam Physician 2001;47:2270–8. [Abstract]
- Schalnus R, Meyer C, Hoppe T, Lüchtenberg M. Modular semiquantitative quality assessment of ophthalmic health information on the internet--reproducibility and correla- tion between different assessment categories. [Article in German] Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2009;226:664–71. [Abstract]
- Mühlhauser I, Oser F. Does WIKIPEDIA provide evi- dence-based health care information? A content analysis. [Article in German] Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2008;102:441–8. [Abstract]
- Corrao S, Leone F, Arnone S. Biomedical information on the internet using search engines. A one-year trial. [Article in Italian] Recenti Prog Med 2004;95:22–6. [Abstract]
- Suzuki J, Kobayashi T. Internet information availability about facial nerve paralysis. [Article in Japanese] Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 2010;113:844-50. [Abstract]
- Kishimoto K, Yoshino C, Fukushima N. Study of the health food information for cancer patients on Japanese websites. [Article in Japanese] Yakugaku Zasshi 2010;130:1017– 27. [Abstract]
- San Norberto EM, Taylor J, Salvador R, Revilla A, Merino B, Vaquero C. The quality of information available on the internet about aortic aneurysm and its endovascular treat- ment. [Article in Spanish] Rev Esp Cardiol 2011;64:869– 75. [Abstract]
- Küçükdurmaz F, Aytekin M, Tuncay I, Sen C. A Pilot Study About Quality Of Information at Health Re- lated Web Sites in Turkish: Meniscus Tear. Nobel Med 2013;9:114–7.
- Wikipedia. Internet. 2014. Available from: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.
- World Health Organization. The Health Internet. 2014 Available from: http://www.who.int/ehealth/pro- grammes/governance/en/
- Allam A, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google out- put. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:100.
- Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573–7.
- Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Con- nolly MJ. Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:568.
- Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN, Manek NJ, et al. Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:1001–6.
- Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Acar A, Calgan Z. What is missing on their web sites? An evaluation of national and interna- tional pharmaceutical companies in Turkey. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:684–91.
- Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Sozen B. Is there an improvement on the Web sites of the national and international pharma- ceutical companies in Turkey? A follow-up study. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:238–43.
- Yegenoglu S, Sozen B, Aslan D, Calgan Z, Cagirci S. An evaluation of the quality of Turkish community pharmacy web sites concerning HON principles. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:375–80.
- Küçükdurmaz F, Ceylan HH, Tuncay İ. The Quality of In- formation about Hip Fractures in Turkish Internet Sites. J Clin Anal Med 2013;4:200–3.
- Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Two wrongs don’t make a right: harm aggravated by inaccurate informa- tion on the Internet. Pediatrics 2002;109:522–3.
A comparison of the quality of online information about total knee arthroplasty available in Turkish and English: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: The internet has become one of the primary resources for patients to obtain health-related information. While the internet continues to evolve in terms of coverage and technology, concerns regarding the quality of available information have arisen. We aimed to investigate the quality of health-related information on Turkish-language medical websites by comparing it to that of English-language medical websites, in which the subject has long been studied.
Methods: The English term “total knee prosthesis” and its Turkish translation, “total diz protezi,” were searched in Google. The 1st 30 results were assessed using a validated tool, the LIDA (Minervation, Oxford, UK), which was designed for the scoring of health-related websites according to accessibility, usability, and reliability.
Results: The Turkish- and English-language websites were not significantly different in terms of accessibility, but the usability and reliability of Turkish websites were found to be significantly poorer. We found that the overall quality of information on Turkish websites was poor in comparison with that of English-language websites.
Conclusion: In order to raise consciousness about this problem and improve the quality of health-related information, further studies on Turkish-language websites should be performed. Attempts should also be made in Turkish-language websites to develop website certification systems and/or encourage the dissemination of existing systems.
Keywords
References
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Internet Project. 13 Jan. 2013. Cited 2 Apr. 2014. Avail- able from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia// Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf.
- Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Son üç ay içinde internet kul- lanan bireylerin interneti kişisel kullanma amaçları verisi. Istatistiksel Tablolar ve Dinamik Sorgulama, Hanehalki Bilisim Teknolojileri Kullanim Arastirmasi; 2013. Avail- able from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_ id=1028.
- Frémont P, Labrecque M, Légaré F, Baillargeon L, Mis- son L. Evaluation of medical web sites. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of an evaluation tool. [Article in French] Can Fam Physician 2001;47:2270–8. [Abstract]
- Schalnus R, Meyer C, Hoppe T, Lüchtenberg M. Modular semiquantitative quality assessment of ophthalmic health information on the internet--reproducibility and correla- tion between different assessment categories. [Article in German] Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2009;226:664–71. [Abstract]
- Mühlhauser I, Oser F. Does WIKIPEDIA provide evi- dence-based health care information? A content analysis. [Article in German] Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2008;102:441–8. [Abstract]
- Corrao S, Leone F, Arnone S. Biomedical information on the internet using search engines. A one-year trial. [Article in Italian] Recenti Prog Med 2004;95:22–6. [Abstract]
- Suzuki J, Kobayashi T. Internet information availability about facial nerve paralysis. [Article in Japanese] Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 2010;113:844-50. [Abstract]
- Kishimoto K, Yoshino C, Fukushima N. Study of the health food information for cancer patients on Japanese websites. [Article in Japanese] Yakugaku Zasshi 2010;130:1017– 27. [Abstract]
- San Norberto EM, Taylor J, Salvador R, Revilla A, Merino B, Vaquero C. The quality of information available on the internet about aortic aneurysm and its endovascular treat- ment. [Article in Spanish] Rev Esp Cardiol 2011;64:869– 75. [Abstract]
- Küçükdurmaz F, Aytekin M, Tuncay I, Sen C. A Pilot Study About Quality Of Information at Health Re- lated Web Sites in Turkish: Meniscus Tear. Nobel Med 2013;9:114–7.
- Wikipedia. Internet. 2014. Available from: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.
- World Health Organization. The Health Internet. 2014 Available from: http://www.who.int/ehealth/pro- grammes/governance/en/
- Allam A, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google out- put. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:100.
- Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573–7.
- Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Con- nolly MJ. Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:568.
- Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN, Manek NJ, et al. Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:1001–6.
- Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Acar A, Calgan Z. What is missing on their web sites? An evaluation of national and interna- tional pharmaceutical companies in Turkey. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:684–91.
- Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Sozen B. Is there an improvement on the Web sites of the national and international pharma- ceutical companies in Turkey? A follow-up study. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:238–43.
- Yegenoglu S, Sozen B, Aslan D, Calgan Z, Cagirci S. An evaluation of the quality of Turkish community pharmacy web sites concerning HON principles. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:375–80.
- Küçükdurmaz F, Ceylan HH, Tuncay İ. The Quality of In- formation about Hip Fractures in Turkish Internet Sites. J Clin Anal Med 2013;4:200–3.
- Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Two wrongs don’t make a right: harm aggravated by inaccurate informa- tion on the Internet. Pediatrics 2002;109:522–3.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 19, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 49 Issue: 4 |