Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Morphometric Analysis of Second Cervical Vertebra: A Radiological Study

Year 2022, Volume: 19 Issue: 3, 488 - 492, 27.12.2022

Semahat Doğru Sibel Ateşoğlu Karabaş Tuğsan Ballı

https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1208504

Abstract

References

  • 1. Charles YP, Prost S, Pesenti S, Ilharreborde B, Bauduin E, Laouissat F, et al. Variation of cervical sagittal alignment pa-rameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(5):1228-1240.
  • 2. Chytas D, Korres DS, Babis GC, Efstathopoulos NE, Papado-poulos AT, Markatos K, et al. Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28:343-349.
  • 3. Xin-yu L, Kai Z, Laing-tai G, Yan-ping Z, Jian-min L. The ana-tomic and radiographic measurement of C2 lamina in Chine-se population. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(12):2261-6.
  • 4. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Niskanen M, Maijanen M, et al. Age-related trends in vertebral di-mensions. J Anat. 2015; 226(5): 434-9.
  • 5. GilliamTB, Freedson PS, Geenen DL, Shahraray B. Physical activity patterns determined by heart rate monitoring in 6-7 year-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1981; 13(1): 65-7.
  • 6. Taylor JR, Twomey LT, Corker M. Bone and soft tissue in-juries in post-mortem lumbar spines. Paraplegia.1990; 28(2):119-29.
  • 7. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, Goodman WG. Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: bio-mechanical implications. Radiology.1994; 190(3):678-82.
  • 8. Gilsanz V, Wren TAL, Ponrartana S, Mora S, Rosen CJ. Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health. Endocr Rev. 2018; 1;39(2): 221-239.
  • 9. Brent Hassel BA, Allan G, Farman BDS. Skeletal maturation evulation using cervical vertebrae. American Journal of Ort-hodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995; 107:58-66.
  • 10. Anusuya JV, Sharan J, Kumar A. Morphometric characteris-tics of cervical vertebrae in subjects with short, normal, and long faces. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021; 43:865–872.
  • 11. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA,Yeasting RA. Marphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the c2 pedicle axis. Spine. 1995; 20:259-263.
  • 12. Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH. Quatitative anatomy of second cervical vertebra. Spine. 1995; 1;20(5): 513-7.
  • 13. Şengül G, Kadıoğlu HH. Morphometric Anatomy of the Atlas and Axis vertebrae. Turkish Neurosurgery.2006;16(2),69-76.
  • 14. Sonone S, Dahapute AA, Waghchoure C, Marathe N, Keny SA, Singh K. Anatomic Considerations of Anterior Transartic-ular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability. Asian Spine J. 2019; 13(6): 890-894.
  • 15. Gosavi S, Swamy V. Morphometric study of the axis verteb-ra. Eur J Anat. 2012; 16 (2): 98-103.
  • 16. Teo EC, Haiblikova S, Winkelstein B, Welch W, Holsgrove T, Cazzola D. Morphometric Analysis of Human Second Cervical Vertebrae (Axis). J Spine. 2017; 6:6.
  • 17. Kandziora F, Schulze-Stahl N, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Schröder R, Mittlmeier T. Screw placement in transoral at-lantoaxial plate systems:an anatomical study. J Neurosurg (Spine 1), 2001; 95: 80-7.
  • 18. Bakırcı S, Sendemir E, Kafa İM. Morphometric analysis of c2 vertebra. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2014; 30:269.
  • 19. Gama I, Navega D, Cunha E. Sex estimation using the second cervical vertebra: a morphometric analysis in a documented Portuguese skeletal sample. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129(2):b365-72.
  • 20. Marlow EJ, Pastor RF. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(1): 165-9.
  • 21. Wescott DJ. Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci. 2000; 45(2):462–6.
  • 22. Taylor JR, Twomey LT, Corker M. Bone and soft tissue in-juries in post-mortem lumbar spines. Paraplegia. 1990; 28, 119–129.
  • 23. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, Goodman WG. Gender Differences in Vertebral Sizes in Adults: Bio-mechanical Implications. Radiology.1994; 190(3): 673-677.
  • 24. Block JE, Genant HK, Black D. Greater vertebral bone mineral mass in exercising young men. The Western Journal of Me-dicine. 1986; 145(1):39-42.
  • 25. Mosekilde L, Bentzen SM, Ortoft G, Jorgensen J. The pre-dictive value of quantitative computed tomography for ver-tebral body compressive strength and ash density. Bone. 1989; 10(6): 465-70
  • 26. Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength – effects of loading. Z Rheumatol. 2000; 59:1.
  • 27. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J. Age-related trends in vertebral dimensions. J. Anat. 2015; 226, 434-439.

İkinci Servikal Vertebranın Morfometrik Analizi: Radyolojik Bir Çalışma

Year 2022, Volume: 19 Issue: 3, 488 - 492, 27.12.2022

Semahat Doğru Sibel Ateşoğlu Karabaş Tuğsan Ballı

https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1208504

Abstract

Amaç: Baş ile gövde arasındaki bağlantıyı sağlayan servikal omurgalar kraniyofasial bir çok yapıyı barındıran önemli bir anatomik konuma sahiptir. Bu çalışmada yetişkin bireylerdeki ikinci servikal vertebranın (C-2) morfometrik özelliklerinin ortaya konulması ve cinsiyete bağlı farklılıkların belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Materyal ve Metod: Çukurova Üniversitesi Radyoloji Anabilim dalına başvuran ve lateral kraniyofasiyal radyografisi çekilmiş 22 yaş ve üstü toplam 89 (40’ı kadın, 49’u erkek) hastada retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen bireylerin yaşlarının ortalaması 47,85 (kadınlarda 48,15, erkeklerde 47,61) idi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen erkeklerin boy ve kilo ölçümlerinin kadınlardan daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Ölçüm parametrelerine baktığımızda total yükseklik (TY), üst dens derinliği (ÜDD), alt dens derinliği (ADD), ön vertebra gövde yüksekliği (ÖVGY), arka vertebra gövde yüksekliği (AVGY) ve horizontal ön-arka uzunluklarının (HÖAU) erkeklerde kadınlardan istatistiksel olarak daha fazla olduğu görülmüştür (p<0,05).
Sonuç: C-2 vertebranın morfometrik özellikleri ile kadın ve erkeklerdeki farklılıkları ortaya konulmuştur. Bu sonuçların göz önünde bulundurularak hastalıkların tanı ve tedavisinde, cerrahi operasyonlarda klinisyenlere yardımcı olabileceği kanaatindeyiz.

Keywords

Axis Morfometri servikal vertebra

References

  • 1. Charles YP, Prost S, Pesenti S, Ilharreborde B, Bauduin E, Laouissat F, et al. Variation of cervical sagittal alignment pa-rameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(5):1228-1240.
  • 2. Chytas D, Korres DS, Babis GC, Efstathopoulos NE, Papado-poulos AT, Markatos K, et al. Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28:343-349.
  • 3. Xin-yu L, Kai Z, Laing-tai G, Yan-ping Z, Jian-min L. The ana-tomic and radiographic measurement of C2 lamina in Chine-se population. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(12):2261-6.
  • 4. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Niskanen M, Maijanen M, et al. Age-related trends in vertebral di-mensions. J Anat. 2015; 226(5): 434-9.
  • 5. GilliamTB, Freedson PS, Geenen DL, Shahraray B. Physical activity patterns determined by heart rate monitoring in 6-7 year-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1981; 13(1): 65-7.
  • 6. Taylor JR, Twomey LT, Corker M. Bone and soft tissue in-juries in post-mortem lumbar spines. Paraplegia.1990; 28(2):119-29.
  • 7. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, Goodman WG. Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: bio-mechanical implications. Radiology.1994; 190(3):678-82.
  • 8. Gilsanz V, Wren TAL, Ponrartana S, Mora S, Rosen CJ. Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health. Endocr Rev. 2018; 1;39(2): 221-239.
  • 9. Brent Hassel BA, Allan G, Farman BDS. Skeletal maturation evulation using cervical vertebrae. American Journal of Ort-hodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995; 107:58-66.
  • 10. Anusuya JV, Sharan J, Kumar A. Morphometric characteris-tics of cervical vertebrae in subjects with short, normal, and long faces. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021; 43:865–872.
  • 11. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA,Yeasting RA. Marphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the c2 pedicle axis. Spine. 1995; 20:259-263.
  • 12. Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH. Quatitative anatomy of second cervical vertebra. Spine. 1995; 1;20(5): 513-7.
  • 13. Şengül G, Kadıoğlu HH. Morphometric Anatomy of the Atlas and Axis vertebrae. Turkish Neurosurgery.2006;16(2),69-76.
  • 14. Sonone S, Dahapute AA, Waghchoure C, Marathe N, Keny SA, Singh K. Anatomic Considerations of Anterior Transartic-ular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability. Asian Spine J. 2019; 13(6): 890-894.
  • 15. Gosavi S, Swamy V. Morphometric study of the axis verteb-ra. Eur J Anat. 2012; 16 (2): 98-103.
  • 16. Teo EC, Haiblikova S, Winkelstein B, Welch W, Holsgrove T, Cazzola D. Morphometric Analysis of Human Second Cervical Vertebrae (Axis). J Spine. 2017; 6:6.
  • 17. Kandziora F, Schulze-Stahl N, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Schröder R, Mittlmeier T. Screw placement in transoral at-lantoaxial plate systems:an anatomical study. J Neurosurg (Spine 1), 2001; 95: 80-7.
  • 18. Bakırcı S, Sendemir E, Kafa İM. Morphometric analysis of c2 vertebra. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2014; 30:269.
  • 19. Gama I, Navega D, Cunha E. Sex estimation using the second cervical vertebra: a morphometric analysis in a documented Portuguese skeletal sample. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129(2):b365-72.
  • 20. Marlow EJ, Pastor RF. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(1): 165-9.
  • 21. Wescott DJ. Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci. 2000; 45(2):462–6.
  • 22. Taylor JR, Twomey LT, Corker M. Bone and soft tissue in-juries in post-mortem lumbar spines. Paraplegia. 1990; 28, 119–129.
  • 23. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, Goodman WG. Gender Differences in Vertebral Sizes in Adults: Bio-mechanical Implications. Radiology.1994; 190(3): 673-677.
  • 24. Block JE, Genant HK, Black D. Greater vertebral bone mineral mass in exercising young men. The Western Journal of Me-dicine. 1986; 145(1):39-42.
  • 25. Mosekilde L, Bentzen SM, Ortoft G, Jorgensen J. The pre-dictive value of quantitative computed tomography for ver-tebral body compressive strength and ash density. Bone. 1989; 10(6): 465-70
  • 26. Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength – effects of loading. Z Rheumatol. 2000; 59:1.
  • 27. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J. Age-related trends in vertebral dimensions. J. Anat. 2015; 226, 434-439.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Semahat Doğru 0000-0003-4069-1806

Sibel Ateşoğlu Karabaş 0000-0002-8469-4518

Tuğsan Ballı 0000-0002-5324-0097

Publication Date December 27, 2022
Submission Date November 24, 2022
Acceptance Date November 29, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 19 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Doğru S, Ateşoğlu Karabaş S, Ballı T. İkinci Servikal Vertebranın Morfometrik Analizi: Radyolojik Bir Çalışma. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;19(3):488-92.
 Download Cover Image

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi  / Journal of Harran University Medical Faculty