Erratum: Comparison of Laparascopic and Open Adrenalectomy

Onur Dulgeroglu; Emine Özlem Gür; Evren Durak; Fatma Tatar; Özgün Akgül; İlker Kızıloğlu; Tayfun Bilgiç; Yusuf Kumkumoğlu; Mehmet Hacıyanlı

doi:10.31067/acusaglik.1049054

EN

Erratum: Comparison of Laparascopic and Open Adrenalectomy

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy, which was performed successfully for the first time in 1992, has become the preferred method in adrenal surgery especially in adrenal diseases. In this study, our aim is to compare the demographic and operative data of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies performed in the general surgery clinic of our hospital. Methods: The records of the patients who were operated in hospital due to a surrenal mass between August 2006 and December 2012 have been retrospectively assessed. Demographic characteristics of the patients, such as age, sex, the size and location of tumors were included. Surgical indications were classified in terms of their radiologic and biochemical investigations. Type of the surgery (lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic or open approach), the incision used in these surgeries (midline, subcoastal and paramedian), the length of operation, the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and the final pathology results were all examined. Results: During the afformentioned period, adrenalectomy was performed in 106 patients. Eighty of these patients (%75,4) were operated by open and 26 of them (%24,6) by lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Subcostal incision was used 61 of 80 patients (% 82,4), whereas 17 patients (% 22,9) were operated by midline incision and 2(% 2,7) were by paramedian incision. No mortality was encountered. Operation time was statistically significantly shorter in the open group (p<0,0166). Duration of hospital stay was statistically significantly longer in open group (p<0,0083). Hospital stay time was statistically significantly longer in midline incision group (p<0,0083). Except for the weight of masses, statistically significant difference was not found between two groups (laparascopic and open surgery) in demographic and operative features (age,gender,side,pathological diagnose,size of mass) releated to postoperative complications. Conclusion: In carefully selected group of patients laparoscopic adrenalectomy offered lesser postoperative hospital stay than the open adrenalectomy. The longer operative time can be decreased when more experience is gained in laparascopic adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be preferred in adrenal disease as the gold standard in centers with completed learning curve. "The list of authors in our article, which was published in the 2021-July issue, was made inadvertently. Considering the contribution of the author in the previous poster paper of the article in 2014, the list of authors has been changed."

The original article was published on 01 July 2021. http://journal.acibadem.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/62213/862954

Keywords

References

1. Prager G, Heinz-Peer G, Passler C, et al. Surgical strategy in adrenal masses. Eur. J. Radiol. 2002;41:70-7. DOI:10.1016/ s0720-048x(01)00441-7
2. Amberson JB, Vaughan ED, Jr., Gray GF, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA from adrenocortical neoplasms. A retrospective study using paraffin-embedded tissue. Cancer. 1987;59:2091- 5. DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19870615)59:12<2091::aidcncr2820591221> 3.0.co;2-u
3. Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, et al. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:637- 44. DOI:10.1210/jcem.85.2.6372
4. Di Buono G, Buscemi S, Lo Monte AI, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preoperative data, surgical technique and clinical outcomes. BMC Surg. 2019;18:128. DOI:10.1186/s12893-018-0456-6
5. Fu B, Li H, Ma X, et al. Robotic Adrenalectomy. In: Zhang X, ed. Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Urology: Springer; 2020. p. 25-33.
6. Dinnes J, Bancos I, Ferrante Di Ruffano L, et al. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Imaging for the diagnosis of malignancy in incidentally discovered adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016;175:R51-64. DOI:10.1530/ EJE-16-0461
7. Luton JP, Martinez M, Coste J, et al. Outcome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma selected for surgery: an analysis of 88 cases investigated in a single clinical center. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000;143:111-7. DOI:10.1530/eje.0.1430111
8. Copeland PM. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Ann. Surg. 1984;199:116-22. DOI:10.1097/00000658-198401000-00021

9. Lau SK and Weiss LM. The Weiss system for evaluating adrenocortical neoplasms: 25 years later. Hum. Pathol. 2009;40:757- 68. DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.03.010
10. Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016;175:G1-G34. DOI:10.1530/EJE-16-0467
11. Gaujoux S, Mihai R, Joint Working Group Of E, et al. European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) and European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENSAT) recommendations for the surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2017;104:358-76. DOI:10.1002/bjs.10414
12. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2018;179:G1-G46. DOI:10.1530/EJE-18-0608
13. Fiori C, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Adrenal tumours: open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2020;32:27-34. DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000594
14. Chalkoo M, Awan N, Makhdoomi H, et al. Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy; A Short Summary with Review of Literature. 2017.
15. Raffaelli M, De Crea C and Bellantone R. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Gland Surg. 2019;8:S41-S52. DOI:10.21037/gs.2019.06.07
16. Koçak S and Özbaş S. Endoskopik Adrenalektomi. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Surgical Medical Sciences. 2007;3:29-36.
17. Aporowicz M, Domosławski P, Czopnik P, et al. Perioperative complications of adrenalectomy–12 years of experience from a single center/teaching hospital and literature review. Archives of medical science: AMS. 2018;14:1010.
18. Lodin M, Privitera A and Giannone G. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA): keys to success: correct surgical indications, adequate preoperative preparation, surgical team experience. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2007;17:392-5. DOI:10.1097/ SLE.0b013e3180f6174b
19. Chan JE, Meneghetti AT, Meloche RM, et al. Prospective comparison of early and late experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Am. J. Surg. 2006;191:682-6. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.042
20. Haveran LA, Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a 10-year single institution experience. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2006;16:217- 21. DOI:10.1097/00129689-200608000-00004

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Erratum

Authors

Onur Dulgeroglu ^*
Türkiye

Emine Özlem Gür
Türkiye

Evren Durak
Türkiye

Fatma Tatar
Türkiye

Özgün Akgül
Türkiye

İlker Kızıloğlu
Türkiye

Tayfun Bilgiç
Türkiye

Yusuf Kumkumoğlu
Türkiye

Mehmet Hacıyanlı
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 2022

Submission Date

January 23, 2021

Acceptance Date

April 14, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 13 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1049054

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA64CL64WR

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Dulgeroglu O, Gür EÖ, Durak E, Tatar F, Akgül Ö, Kızıloğlu İ, Bilgiç T, Kumkumoğlu Y, Hacıyanlı M (January 1, 2022) Erratum: Comparison of Laparascopic and Open Adrenalectomy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 1 197–202.