Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Assessment of the Relationship Between University Students' Food Consumption and Anthropometric Measurements and Phase Angle

Year 2022, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 400 - 406, 01.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1058998

Abstract

Purpose: This study was carried out to assess the relationship between university students' food consumption and anthropometric measurements, and phase angle (PA).
Methods: The study was conducted with a total of 240 students between the ages of 18-25 studying at the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at XXX University Health School. Research data were collected using a questionnaire that included about demographic information and questions about physical activity levels and three-day food consumption record was taken. Lastly, anthropometric measurements of the students were performed by the researcher in person.
Results: The study's findings revealed that the students' energy intake was lower than their energy expenditures. The body mass indexes (BMI), and waist circumferences of female and male students were calculated as 21.8 ± 3.2 kg/m2 and 23 ± 3.4 kg/m2, and 75.2 ± 8.1 cm and 85 ± 10 cm, respectively. The PA was 5.7 ± 0.5º in female students and 6.7 ± 0.5º in male students (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The study's findings revealed that male students had significantly higher PA values. The PA values of female students were found to have increased with BMI, waist circumference, and body muscle mass values. There was also no significant relationship between students' PA values and and food consumption levels regardless of gender.

References

  • 1. Murtaugh MA, Herrick JS, Sweeney C, et al. Diet Composition and Risk of Overweight and Obesity in Women Living in the Southwestern United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1311–1321. DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.008.
  • 2. Howarth NC, Huang TT-K, Roberts SB, et al. Dietary Fiber and Fat Are Associated with Excess Weight in Young and Middle-Aged US Adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1365–1372. DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2005.06.001.
  • 3. Schulz M, Nöthlings U, Hoffmann K, et al. Identification of a Food Pattern Characterized by High-Fiber and Low-Fat Food Choices Associated with Low Prospective Weight Change in the EPIC-Potsdam Cohort. J Nutr. 2005;135:1183–1189. DOI:10.1093/jn/135.5.1183.
  • 4. Şanlıer N. Gençlerde biyokimyasal bulgular, antropometrik ölçümler, vücut bileşimi, beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2005;25:47–73.
  • 5. Barbosa-Silva MCG, Barros AJ. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:311–317. DOI:10.1097/01.mco.0000165011.69943.39.
  • 6. Kumar S, Dutt A, Hemraj S, et al. Phase angle measurement in healthy human subjects through bio-impedance analysis. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15:1180–1184.
  • 7. Smith S, Madden AM. Body composition and functional assessment of nutritional status in adults: a narrative review of imaging, impedance, strength and functional techniques. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29:714–732. DOI:10.1111/jhn.12372.
  • 8. Yentür E. Beslenme Durumunun Değerlendirilmesi. Klin Gelişim. 2011;24:1–4.
  • 9. Norman K, Stobäus N, Pirlich M, et al. Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:854–861. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008.
  • 10. Baysal A. Beslenme. 13. baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Hatiboğlu Yayınevi, 2011.
  • 11. Rakıcıoğlu N, Acar Tek N, Ayaz A, et al. Yemek ve Besin Fotoğraf Kataloğu. 5. baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2015.
  • 12. Mazıcıoğlu MM. The anthropometric measuring methods for monitoring growth and development: the methodology of growth follow-up. Turkiye Aile Hekim Derg. 2011;15:101–108.
  • 13. Akram DS, Astrup A V., Atinmo T, et al. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series. 2000;894.
  • 14. Pekcan G. Beslenme durumunun saptanması. In: Baysal A., Aksoy M., Besler H. T., Bozkurt N., Keçecioğlu S., Mercanlıgil S. M., Merdol T. K., Pekcan G., Yıldız E., eds. Diyet El Kitabı. Ankara, Turkey: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, 2013. p. 67–142.
  • 15. Diyetisyenler için hasta izleme rehberi/Ağırlık yönetimi el kitabı. Yayın No:1081. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü, 2017.
  • 16. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Beslenme Rehberi. 2. baskı. Ankara, Turkey, 2019.
  • 17. Cobo-Cuenca AI, Garrido-Miguel M, Soriano-Cano A, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Its Association with Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Spanish University Students. Nutrients. 2019;11:2830. DOI:10.3390/nu11112830.
  • 18. Zaccagni L, Barbieri D, Gualdi-Russo E. Body composition and physical activity in Italian university students. J Transl Med. 2014;12:120. DOI:10.1186/1479-5876-12-120.
  • 19. Arabacı R, Erden S, Haşıl Korkmaz N, et al. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktiviteleri, Beslenme Alışkanlıkları Ve Vücut Kompozisyonları Arasındaki Ilişkinin Araştırılması. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Derg. 2012;6:234–243.
  • 20. Selberg O, Selberg D. Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;86:509–516. DOI:10.1007/s00421-001-0570-4.
  • 21. Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, et al. The relationship between bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in advanced colorectal cancer. Nutr J. 2008;7:19. DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-7-19.
  • 22. Doğrusoy M. 20-65 yaş arası kadınların biyoelektrik impedans yöntemiyle faz açısı ölçümlerinin ve besin tüketimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Haliç Üniversity, İstanbul, 2018.
  • 23. Bosy-Westphal A, Danielzik S, Dörhöfer R-P, et al. Phase Angle From Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: Population Reference Values by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2006;30:309–316. DOI:10.1177/0148607106030004309.
  • 24. Gonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, et al. Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:712–716. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.115.116772.
  • 25. Kyle UG, Soundar EP, Genton L, et al. Can phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis assess nutritional risk? A comparison between healthy and hospitalized subjects. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:875–881. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.04.002.
Year 2022, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 400 - 406, 01.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1058998

Abstract

References

  • 1. Murtaugh MA, Herrick JS, Sweeney C, et al. Diet Composition and Risk of Overweight and Obesity in Women Living in the Southwestern United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1311–1321. DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.008.
  • 2. Howarth NC, Huang TT-K, Roberts SB, et al. Dietary Fiber and Fat Are Associated with Excess Weight in Young and Middle-Aged US Adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1365–1372. DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2005.06.001.
  • 3. Schulz M, Nöthlings U, Hoffmann K, et al. Identification of a Food Pattern Characterized by High-Fiber and Low-Fat Food Choices Associated with Low Prospective Weight Change in the EPIC-Potsdam Cohort. J Nutr. 2005;135:1183–1189. DOI:10.1093/jn/135.5.1183.
  • 4. Şanlıer N. Gençlerde biyokimyasal bulgular, antropometrik ölçümler, vücut bileşimi, beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2005;25:47–73.
  • 5. Barbosa-Silva MCG, Barros AJ. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:311–317. DOI:10.1097/01.mco.0000165011.69943.39.
  • 6. Kumar S, Dutt A, Hemraj S, et al. Phase angle measurement in healthy human subjects through bio-impedance analysis. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15:1180–1184.
  • 7. Smith S, Madden AM. Body composition and functional assessment of nutritional status in adults: a narrative review of imaging, impedance, strength and functional techniques. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29:714–732. DOI:10.1111/jhn.12372.
  • 8. Yentür E. Beslenme Durumunun Değerlendirilmesi. Klin Gelişim. 2011;24:1–4.
  • 9. Norman K, Stobäus N, Pirlich M, et al. Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:854–861. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008.
  • 10. Baysal A. Beslenme. 13. baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Hatiboğlu Yayınevi, 2011.
  • 11. Rakıcıoğlu N, Acar Tek N, Ayaz A, et al. Yemek ve Besin Fotoğraf Kataloğu. 5. baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2015.
  • 12. Mazıcıoğlu MM. The anthropometric measuring methods for monitoring growth and development: the methodology of growth follow-up. Turkiye Aile Hekim Derg. 2011;15:101–108.
  • 13. Akram DS, Astrup A V., Atinmo T, et al. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series. 2000;894.
  • 14. Pekcan G. Beslenme durumunun saptanması. In: Baysal A., Aksoy M., Besler H. T., Bozkurt N., Keçecioğlu S., Mercanlıgil S. M., Merdol T. K., Pekcan G., Yıldız E., eds. Diyet El Kitabı. Ankara, Turkey: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, 2013. p. 67–142.
  • 15. Diyetisyenler için hasta izleme rehberi/Ağırlık yönetimi el kitabı. Yayın No:1081. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü, 2017.
  • 16. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Beslenme Rehberi. 2. baskı. Ankara, Turkey, 2019.
  • 17. Cobo-Cuenca AI, Garrido-Miguel M, Soriano-Cano A, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Its Association with Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Spanish University Students. Nutrients. 2019;11:2830. DOI:10.3390/nu11112830.
  • 18. Zaccagni L, Barbieri D, Gualdi-Russo E. Body composition and physical activity in Italian university students. J Transl Med. 2014;12:120. DOI:10.1186/1479-5876-12-120.
  • 19. Arabacı R, Erden S, Haşıl Korkmaz N, et al. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktiviteleri, Beslenme Alışkanlıkları Ve Vücut Kompozisyonları Arasındaki Ilişkinin Araştırılması. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Derg. 2012;6:234–243.
  • 20. Selberg O, Selberg D. Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;86:509–516. DOI:10.1007/s00421-001-0570-4.
  • 21. Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, et al. The relationship between bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in advanced colorectal cancer. Nutr J. 2008;7:19. DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-7-19.
  • 22. Doğrusoy M. 20-65 yaş arası kadınların biyoelektrik impedans yöntemiyle faz açısı ölçümlerinin ve besin tüketimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Haliç Üniversity, İstanbul, 2018.
  • 23. Bosy-Westphal A, Danielzik S, Dörhöfer R-P, et al. Phase Angle From Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: Population Reference Values by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2006;30:309–316. DOI:10.1177/0148607106030004309.
  • 24. Gonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, et al. Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:712–716. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.115.116772.
  • 25. Kyle UG, Soundar EP, Genton L, et al. Can phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis assess nutritional risk? A comparison between healthy and hospitalized subjects. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:875–881. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.04.002.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Nutrition and Dietetics
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Merve Ekici 0000-0002-0613-5972

Gözde Arıtıcı Çolak 0000-0002-7982-180X

Publication Date July 1, 2022
Submission Date January 17, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Ekici M, Arıtıcı Çolak G (July 1, 2022) Assessment of the Relationship Between University Students’ Food Consumption and Anthropometric Measurements and Phase Angle. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 3 400–406.