Abstract
References
- Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, et al. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 116–21.
- Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, et al. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1995; 54: 30–1.
- Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8: 296–9.
- Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Cordasco FA, et al. Differential patterns of muscle activation in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 165–71.
- Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clinics in Sports Medicine 2012; 31: 589-604.
- YouTube statistics. https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html (accessed on 03.11.2020).
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;b21: 173-94.
- Goyal R, Mercado AE, Ring D, Crijns TJ. Most YouTube videos about carpal tunnel syndrome have the potential to reinforce misconceptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479: 2296-302.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, et al. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82469.
- Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 1-5.
- Hungerford DS. Internet access produces misinformed patients: managing the confusion. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 9.
- Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2566–71.
- Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, et al. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J 2010; 10: 350–4.
- Celik H, Polat O, Ozcan C, Camur S, Kilinc BE, Uzun M. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on rotator cuff repair on YouTube. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106: 31-4.
- Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 840–5.
- Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19: 373–6.
- Mert A, Bozgeyik B. Quality and content analysis of carpal tunnel videos on YouTube. Indian J Orthop 2021; 1-6.
- Ozdemir O, Diren F, Boyali O, et al. Metric evaluation of reliability and transparency of the videos about carpal tunnel syndrome surgery in the online platforms: assessment of YouTube Videos' content. Neurospine 2021; 18: 363-8.
- Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears. Cureus 2020; 12: e6852.
Are YouTube videos a sufficient resource for informing patients in the treatment of rotator cuff tears?
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the information quality of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tear treatment.
Material and Method: A YouTube search was performed using the keyword ‘rotator cuff tear’ to determine the first 100 most watched videos related to rotator cuff tears. A total of 57 videos met our inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Videos were evaluated for information quality by using DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and rotator cuff informational assessment (RCIA) scores. Number of views, time since upload, view rate, number of likes, number of dislikes used to calculate the video power index (VPI) and these criteria were used to determine video popularity. Video length (sec), video source and video content were also evaluated and used for correlation evaluations.
Results: The mean DISCERN score was 33.81 (21-56), the mean JAMA score was 3.05 (1-4), and the mean RCIA score was 3.63 (0.5-7.5). Statistical analysis revealed that, independent of the video source and popularity, the videos were informationally poor and inadequate. The only significant correlation was between video length and data source.
Conclusion: This present study demonstrated that the quality of information provided by YouTube videos about rotator cuff tear treatment was poor. The generation of survey systems for informational videos and the provision of accurate and thorough informational videos by professional health organizations will be the best ways to inform patients.
References
- Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, et al. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 116–21.
- Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, et al. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1995; 54: 30–1.
- Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8: 296–9.
- Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Cordasco FA, et al. Differential patterns of muscle activation in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 165–71.
- Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clinics in Sports Medicine 2012; 31: 589-604.
- YouTube statistics. https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html (accessed on 03.11.2020).
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;b21: 173-94.
- Goyal R, Mercado AE, Ring D, Crijns TJ. Most YouTube videos about carpal tunnel syndrome have the potential to reinforce misconceptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479: 2296-302.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, et al. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82469.
- Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 1-5.
- Hungerford DS. Internet access produces misinformed patients: managing the confusion. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 9.
- Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2566–71.
- Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, et al. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J 2010; 10: 350–4.
- Celik H, Polat O, Ozcan C, Camur S, Kilinc BE, Uzun M. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on rotator cuff repair on YouTube. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106: 31-4.
- Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 840–5.
- Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19: 373–6.
- Mert A, Bozgeyik B. Quality and content analysis of carpal tunnel videos on YouTube. Indian J Orthop 2021; 1-6.
- Ozdemir O, Diren F, Boyali O, et al. Metric evaluation of reliability and transparency of the videos about carpal tunnel syndrome surgery in the online platforms: assessment of YouTube Videos' content. Neurospine 2021; 18: 363-8.
- Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears. Cureus 2020; 12: e6852.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 17, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 1 |
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].
The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;
Ulakbim TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR, EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC), DOAJ, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index
Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review".
Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user. https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535
Journal charge policy https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912
Editor List for 2022
Assoc. Prof. Alpaslan TANOĞLU (MD)
Prof. Aydın ÇİFCİ (MD)
Prof. İbrahim Celalaettin HAZNEDAROĞLU (MD)
Prof. Murat KEKİLLİ (MD)
Prof. Yavuz BEYAZIT (MD)
Prof. Ekrem ÜNAL (MD)
Prof. Ahmet EKEN (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Ercan YUVANÇ (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Bekir UÇAN (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Sinan DAL (MD)
Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.
Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.
Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.