Abstract
Daniel Bell’in Sanayi Sonrası Toplumun Gelişi adlı eseri, 21. Yüzyıl küresel toplumlarının sosyo-ekonomik tablosunu ortaya koymak açısından önemli veriler sunmaktadır. Temelde “bilgi” olgusu ve süreçleri özelinde şekillenen sanayi sonrası toplum, önceki toplumsal formasyonlardan farklı olarak bireyi ve onun toplum içindeki konumunu daha aktif bir pozisyona taşır. Bu aktif olma hali, teknolojide, bilimde ve entelektüel alanda yeni türden toplumsal ilişkileri de beraberinde getirir. Mevcut çalışma, sanayi sonrası toplum özelinde Türkiye’de son 10-15 yıllık süre içerisinde bilimde, teknolojide ve entelektüel alanda ortaya çıkan gelişmeleri ve yeni türden ilişkileri analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu sebeple, çalışma, ilgili kavramın teorik yansımalarına ışık tuttuktan sonra, sa-nayi sonrası toplumun Türkiye’de TÜBİTAK, üniversiteler, düşünce enstitüleri, teknoloji yatırımları vb. alanlardaki uygulamalarını ele alacaktır. Çalışmanın son bölümündeyse sanayi sonrası toplum kavramının Türkiye toplumuna uygulanabilirliğine dair bazı tartışalara ve eleştirel okumalara yer verilecektir.
References
- Alkin, R. C. (2014). Introduction to the Relationship between Sociology and Modernity in Specific to Emile Durkheim and Max Weber’s Studies, European Scientific Journal, 10 (5), 1-11.
- Bell, D. (1960). The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Glencoe IL: Free Press.
- Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Reissue Edition, New York: Basic Books.
- Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Vol: 1: The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Dalton, R. J. (2006). Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7 (1), 1-22.
- Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society, Edited with an Introduction by Lewis Cosen, trans by: W. D. Halls, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
- Domondon, A. (2014). Assessing Bell’s Forecast: Big Science and the Post-Industrial Society. The International Journal of Science in Society, 4, 117-128.
- Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
- Franzosi, R. (1995). The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Post-war Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kumar, K. (1978). Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
- Kumar, K. (2005). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press
- Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2007). The Communist Manifesto. Radford VA: Wilder Publications.
- Piore, M. J. & Charles F. S. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books
- Ross, G. (1974). The Second Coming of Daniel Bell. Socialist Register, 11, 331-348.
- Watsons, M. (1996). Key Sociologists: Daniel Bell. London: Routledge.
- Weber, M. (2001). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons, New York: Routledge.
Introduction to Development of Academic and Scientific Knowledge in Turkey in Specific to Post-Industrial Society
Abstract
Daniel Bell’s study, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, keeps
many important aspects in terms of illustrating the major socio-economic parameters of 21st Century’s
global societies. Post industrial society, which is basically shaped on the concept of
“knowledge” and processes regarding knowledge, brings individual and his status in society to a
more active position unlike previous social formations’ attempts on individual. This activation brings
original social relationships in technology, science, and intellectual areas. Current study proposes to
analyse the 10-15 year-period developments and new type of relationships in science, technology, and
intellectual area in Turkey in specific to post industrial society. Within this purpose in mind, after
highlighting the conceptual background, the application areas of post industrial society in Turkey
such as TUBİTAK (official academic council), universities, thinking institutes, technology investments,
etc. will be explored. At the last part of the study, on the other hand, some of the discussions
and critical readings on the applicability of the concept of post industrial society to Turkish society
will be issued
References
- Alkin, R. C. (2014). Introduction to the Relationship between Sociology and Modernity in Specific to Emile Durkheim and Max Weber’s Studies, European Scientific Journal, 10 (5), 1-11.
- Bell, D. (1960). The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Glencoe IL: Free Press.
- Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Reissue Edition, New York: Basic Books.
- Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Vol: 1: The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Dalton, R. J. (2006). Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7 (1), 1-22.
- Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society, Edited with an Introduction by Lewis Cosen, trans by: W. D. Halls, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
- Domondon, A. (2014). Assessing Bell’s Forecast: Big Science and the Post-Industrial Society. The International Journal of Science in Society, 4, 117-128.
- Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
- Franzosi, R. (1995). The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Post-war Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kumar, K. (1978). Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
- Kumar, K. (2005). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press
- Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2007). The Communist Manifesto. Radford VA: Wilder Publications.
- Piore, M. J. & Charles F. S. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books
- Ross, G. (1974). The Second Coming of Daniel Bell. Socialist Register, 11, 331-348.
- Watsons, M. (1996). Key Sociologists: Daniel Bell. London: Routledge.
- Weber, M. (2001). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons, New York: Routledge.
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2016 |
| Acceptance Date | December 14, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 6 Issue: 11 |
