Research Article
Year 2022,
, 689 - 695, 01.10.2022
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The speech information obtained from the acoustic cue alone is not sufficient. The visual component of speech is crucial for speech perception. This study aims to show that individual hearing sensitivity awareness has increased due to the blocking of visual components of speech as a result of the use of personal face masks with the Covid 19 pandemic.
Subjects and Methods: A scale was prepared with questions that measured individuals' ability to use auditory stimuli in various conditions before and after the pandemic. The scale prepared consists of two sections and a total of 15 items. The questions in the first section are about pre-pandemic hearing loss awareness, and the second section is about post-pandemic hearing loss awareness. The age average of 1046 people included in the study was 49.47 ± 11.06.
Results: Those who do not feel the need to repeat what was spoken in face-to-face meetings before the pandemic need to repeat what was spoken significantly after the pandemic (p<0.001). The findings show the increased need to repeat spoken words in individuals who wear face masks. Also, people have trouble recognizing speech in noisy environments is due to the absence of visual speech cues, compared to the absence of such trouble before the pandemic.
Conclusion: The use of personal face masks in the post-pandemic period has changed the awareness of individual hearing sensitivity due to the disappearance of the visual element of speech.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
none
Project Number
none
Thanks
We express our sincere gratitude to Aysegul Yabaci from the Biostatistics Department of the Bezmi-alem University for the technical support.
References
- Referans 1. Summerfield Q. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992; 335:71-8.
- Referans 2. [In-text-citation: (Worldometers)]. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/countries- where-coronavirus- has-spread/
- Referans 3. Turkiyenin koronavirusle mucadelesinde son 24 saatte yasananlar [In-text-citation: 2020 Aug 8]. Retrieved from: https://web.arhive.org/web/20200406090250/https:/www.aa.com.tr/tr/koronavirus/turkiyenin-koronavirusle-mucadelesinde-son-24-saatte-yasananlar/1791816
- Referans 4. Hardy CJD, Marshall CR, Golden HL, Clark CN, Mummery CJ, et al. Hearing and dementia. J Neurol. 2016; 263:2339-54.
- Referans 5. Peracino A. Hearing loss and dementia in the aging population. Audiol Neu-rootol. 2014;19 Suppl 1:6-9. Referans 6. Heidari A, Moossavi A, Yadegari F, Bakhshi E, Ahadi M. Effect of Vowel Au-ditory Training on the Speech-In-Noise Perception among Older Adults with Normal Hearing. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 32:229-36.
- Referans 7. Chandrasekaran C, Trubanova A, Stillittano S, Caplier A, Ghazanfar AA. The nat-ural statistics of audio-visual speech. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 ;5: e1000436.
- Referans 8. Girin L, Schwartz JL, Feng G. Audio–visual enhancement of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109:3007-20.
- Referans 9. Rosenblum LD. Speech Perception as a Multimodal Phenomenon. Curr Dir Psy-chol Sci. 2008; 17:405-9. Referans 10. Yehia H, Rubin P, Vatikiotis-Bateson E. Quantitative association of vocal-tract and facial behavior. Speech Communication. 1998; 26:23–43.
- Referans 11. Mcgurk H, Macdonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976; 264:746-8.
- Referans 12. Stacey JE, Howard CJ, Mitra S, Stacey PC. Audio-visual integration in noise: In-fluence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 82:3544-57.
- Referans 13. Grant KW, Seitz PF. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory de-tection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108:1197-208.
- Referans 14. Grant KW, Walden BE. Spectral distribution of prosodic information. J Speech Hear Res. 1996; 39:228-38. Referans 15. Macleod A, Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech per-ception in noise. Br J Audiol. 1987; 21:131-41.
- Referans 16. Robert-Ribes J, Schwartz, JL, Lallouache T, Escudier P. Complementarity and synergy in bimodal speech: auditory, visual, and audio–visual identification of French oral vowels in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103:3677-89.
- Referans 17. Ross LA, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt VM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 17:1147-53.
- Referans 18. Jaekl P, Pesquita A, Alsius A, Munhall K, Soto-Faraco S. The contribution of dy-namic visual cues to audio-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 75:402-10.
- Referans 19. Trecca EMC, Gelardi M, Cassano M. COVID-19 and hearing difficulties. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41:102496.
- Referans 20. Ertugrul S, Soylemez E. Explosion in hearing aid demands after Covid-19 out-break curfew. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 278:843-4.
Year 2022,
, 689 - 695, 01.10.2022
Abstract
Project Number
none
References
- Referans 1. Summerfield Q. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992; 335:71-8.
- Referans 2. [In-text-citation: (Worldometers)]. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/countries- where-coronavirus- has-spread/
- Referans 3. Turkiyenin koronavirusle mucadelesinde son 24 saatte yasananlar [In-text-citation: 2020 Aug 8]. Retrieved from: https://web.arhive.org/web/20200406090250/https:/www.aa.com.tr/tr/koronavirus/turkiyenin-koronavirusle-mucadelesinde-son-24-saatte-yasananlar/1791816
- Referans 4. Hardy CJD, Marshall CR, Golden HL, Clark CN, Mummery CJ, et al. Hearing and dementia. J Neurol. 2016; 263:2339-54.
- Referans 5. Peracino A. Hearing loss and dementia in the aging population. Audiol Neu-rootol. 2014;19 Suppl 1:6-9. Referans 6. Heidari A, Moossavi A, Yadegari F, Bakhshi E, Ahadi M. Effect of Vowel Au-ditory Training on the Speech-In-Noise Perception among Older Adults with Normal Hearing. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 32:229-36.
- Referans 7. Chandrasekaran C, Trubanova A, Stillittano S, Caplier A, Ghazanfar AA. The nat-ural statistics of audio-visual speech. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 ;5: e1000436.
- Referans 8. Girin L, Schwartz JL, Feng G. Audio–visual enhancement of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109:3007-20.
- Referans 9. Rosenblum LD. Speech Perception as a Multimodal Phenomenon. Curr Dir Psy-chol Sci. 2008; 17:405-9. Referans 10. Yehia H, Rubin P, Vatikiotis-Bateson E. Quantitative association of vocal-tract and facial behavior. Speech Communication. 1998; 26:23–43.
- Referans 11. Mcgurk H, Macdonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976; 264:746-8.
- Referans 12. Stacey JE, Howard CJ, Mitra S, Stacey PC. Audio-visual integration in noise: In-fluence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 82:3544-57.
- Referans 13. Grant KW, Seitz PF. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory de-tection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108:1197-208.
- Referans 14. Grant KW, Walden BE. Spectral distribution of prosodic information. J Speech Hear Res. 1996; 39:228-38. Referans 15. Macleod A, Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech per-ception in noise. Br J Audiol. 1987; 21:131-41.
- Referans 16. Robert-Ribes J, Schwartz, JL, Lallouache T, Escudier P. Complementarity and synergy in bimodal speech: auditory, visual, and audio–visual identification of French oral vowels in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103:3677-89.
- Referans 17. Ross LA, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt VM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 17:1147-53.
- Referans 18. Jaekl P, Pesquita A, Alsius A, Munhall K, Soto-Faraco S. The contribution of dy-namic visual cues to audio-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 75:402-10.
- Referans 19. Trecca EMC, Gelardi M, Cassano M. COVID-19 and hearing difficulties. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41:102496.
- Referans 20. Ertugrul S, Soylemez E. Explosion in hearing aid demands after Covid-19 out-break curfew. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 278:843-4.
There are 17 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Audiology |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | none |
| Publication Date | October 1, 2022 |
| Submission Date | January 18, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 |