Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, , 197 - 207, 17.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1176800

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1 Fareed M and Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Annals of human biology. 2017;44:99-107.
  • 2 Bİnbay T, Arik Bİnbay D, Ulaş H, et al. Şizofrenide anne-baba akraba evliliğinin klinik özelliklere etkisi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2017;18.
  • 3 Durduran Y, Bodur S, Çakıl E, et al. Konya il merkezinde sağlıkta dönüşüm öncesi ve sonrası gebe ve bebek izlemleri. Dicle Medical Journal/Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2012;39.
  • 4 Nar MŞ. Tıbbi Antropoloji: Akraba Evliliklerinin Patolojik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;52:223-41.
  • 5 Şahİn İA and Selma Ş. AKRABA EVLİLİĞİ TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ: BİR METODOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences. 2020;6:168-91.
  • 6 Chen X, Hay JL, Waters EA, et al. Health literacy and use and trust in health information. Journal of health communication. 2018;23:724-34.
  • 7 Kutlu G and Akbulut Y. Türkiye’de sağlık okuryazarlığı politikalarının hastaneler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2019;11:132-43.
  • 8 Bakanlığı TS and Müdürlüğü TSHG. Sağlığın teşviki ve geliştirilmesi sözlüğü. Bakanlık yayın. 2011;814.
  • 9 Yilmazel G. 8c Çetinkaya, F.(2016). Sağlık okuryazarlığının toplum sağlığı açısından önemi [The importance of health literacy for community health]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin.15:69-74.
  • 10 Squiers L, Peinado S, Berkman N, et al. The health literacy skills framework. Journal of health communication. 2012;17:30-54.
  • 11 Bobov G and Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language. Journal of religion and health. 2020;59:1080-95.
  • 12 Ersin F, Capik C, Kissal A, et al. Breast cancer fatalism scale: A validity and reliability study in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2018;11:783.
  • 13 Dayapoglu N, Ayyıldız Nİ and Şeker D. Determination of health fatalism and the factors affecting health fatalism in patients with epilepsy in the North of Turkey. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2021;115:107641.
  • 14 Alp Şahin İ. Akraba evliliği tutum ölçeği: Metodolojik bir çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
  • 15 Temel AB and Zühal A. Evaluation of validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Health Literacy Scale. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2017;25:85-94.
  • 16 Kaya A and Bozkur B. Kadercilik Eğilimi Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015;11.
  • 17 Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn Boston. Ma: Pearson. 2013.
  • 18 Jaber L, Romano O, Halpern GJ, et al. Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: survey among Israeli Arab adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.
  • 19 Sandridge AL, Takeddin J, Al-Kaabi E, et al. Consanguinity in Qatar: knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of biosocial science. 2010;42:59-82.
  • 20 Sedehi M, Keshtkar A and Golalipour MJ. The knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the North of Iran. Journal of clinical and diagnostic Research. 2012;6:1233-6.
  • 21 Middle I, Al-Salloum A, Al-Herbish A, et al. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1881-4.
  • 22 Al Salloum A, El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish A, et al. Prevalence of selected congenital anomalies in Saudi children: a community-based study. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2015;35:107-10.
  • 23 Anwar S, Taslem Mourosi J, Arafat Y, et al. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2020;15:e0241610.
  • 24 Hussain R and Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1998;30:261-75.
  • 25 Hussain R. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1999;31:449-61.
  • 26 Şen ŞR. Aydın il merkezinde akraba evliliği sıklığı ve gebelik sonuçları ile ilişkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2010.
  • 27 Samli H, Toprak D and Solak M. Afyonkarahisar ilinde Akraba Evlilikleri ve I Bunun Dogumsal Anomaliler ile Iliskisi. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2006;7.
  • 28 Al-Gazali L, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq Y, et al. consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of biosocial science. 1997;29:491-7.
  • 29 Alharbi OA, Al-Shaia WA, Al-Hamam AA, et al. Attitude of Saudi Arabian adults towards consanguineous marriage. Qatar Medical Journal. 2015;2015:12.
  • 30 Teeuw ME, Loukili G, Bartels EA, et al. Consanguineous marriage and reproductive risk: attitudes and understanding of ethnic groups practising consanguinity in Western society. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;22:452-7.
  • 31 Bener A and Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18:315–20-–20.
  • 32 Cho YI, Lee S-YD, Arozullah AM, et al. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Social science & medicine. 2008;66:1809-16.
  • 33 Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, De Vries E, et al. Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;167:14-21.
  • 34 Morris NS, Maclean CD and Littenberg B. Change in health literacy over 2 years in older adults with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2013;39:638-46.
  • 35 Biçer EB and Malatyali İ. Sağlık okuryazarlık düzeyinin belirlenmesi: Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi örneği. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2018;17:1-15.
  • 36 Temel AB and Çİmen Z. KRONİK HASTALIĞI OLAN YAŞLI BİREYLERDE SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIĞI, SAĞLIK ALGISI VE İLİŞKİLİ FAKTÖRLER. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;33:105-25.
  • 37 Acar GA, Baltaci K, Acimiş NM, et al. Bir Tekstil Fabrikasında Çalışanlarda Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Etmenler. 3. International 21. National Public Health Congress; 2019.
  • 38 Selvi A. Yakınında meme kanseri olan kadınların öğrenim gereksinimleri ile kadercilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa; 2019.
  • 39 Serİn M, Taştan A and Ayten A. Trafikte Sürücü Davranışı ve Dindarlık İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği. Erciyes Akademi.36:186-212.
  • 40 Orhan K. Validity and Reliability Study of Fatality Tendency Scale. Uluslararası Medeniyet Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2017;2:83-102.
  • 41 Charkazi A, Samimi A, Razzaghi K, et al. Adherence to recommended breast cancer screening in Iranian Turkmen women: the role of knowledge and beliefs. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013;2013.
  • 42 Denewer A, Farouk O, Mostafa WA, et al. Social support and hope among Egyptian women with breast cancer after mastectomy. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2011;5:BCBCR. S6655.
  • 43 Hwang JJ, Donnelly TT, Ewashen C, et al. Sociocultural influences on Arab women’s participation in breast cancer screening in Qatar. Qualitative health research. 2017;27:714-26.
  • 44 Powe BD, Hamilton J and Brooks P. Perceptions of cancer fatalism and cancer knowledge: a comparison of older and younger African American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2006;24:1-13.
  • 45 Kiraç R and Öztürk YE. HALKIN SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYİ İLE SAĞLIK KAYGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;23:214-43.

Consanguineous Marriage, Health Literacy and Fatalism Levels of Different Generations: A Descriptive-Correlational Study in A Sample from Turkey

Yıl 2023, , 197 - 207, 17.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1176800

Öz

Objective: This research was conducted to determine consanguineous marriage, health literacy, and fatalism levels of different generations and examine their relationship.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted with 463 individuals living in XXX between September 2021-March 2022.
Results: Significant differences were found between the individuals' Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale, Health Literacy Scale, and Fatalism Tendency Scale total score means and their generation (p<0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between the total score mean of the Individual's Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale and the total and all sub-dimensions of the Health Literacy Scale (p<0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between the total score mean of the Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale and the total score mean of the Fatalism Tendency Scale and age (p<0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between the Health Literacy Scale Total Score Mean and age (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In our study, it was found that the attitude of the baby boom generation towards consanguineous marriage was higher, the health literacy level of the Z generation was higher, and the fatalism tendency of the X generation was found to be higher.

Kaynakça

  • 1 Fareed M and Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Annals of human biology. 2017;44:99-107.
  • 2 Bİnbay T, Arik Bİnbay D, Ulaş H, et al. Şizofrenide anne-baba akraba evliliğinin klinik özelliklere etkisi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2017;18.
  • 3 Durduran Y, Bodur S, Çakıl E, et al. Konya il merkezinde sağlıkta dönüşüm öncesi ve sonrası gebe ve bebek izlemleri. Dicle Medical Journal/Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2012;39.
  • 4 Nar MŞ. Tıbbi Antropoloji: Akraba Evliliklerinin Patolojik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;52:223-41.
  • 5 Şahİn İA and Selma Ş. AKRABA EVLİLİĞİ TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ: BİR METODOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences. 2020;6:168-91.
  • 6 Chen X, Hay JL, Waters EA, et al. Health literacy and use and trust in health information. Journal of health communication. 2018;23:724-34.
  • 7 Kutlu G and Akbulut Y. Türkiye’de sağlık okuryazarlığı politikalarının hastaneler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2019;11:132-43.
  • 8 Bakanlığı TS and Müdürlüğü TSHG. Sağlığın teşviki ve geliştirilmesi sözlüğü. Bakanlık yayın. 2011;814.
  • 9 Yilmazel G. 8c Çetinkaya, F.(2016). Sağlık okuryazarlığının toplum sağlığı açısından önemi [The importance of health literacy for community health]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin.15:69-74.
  • 10 Squiers L, Peinado S, Berkman N, et al. The health literacy skills framework. Journal of health communication. 2012;17:30-54.
  • 11 Bobov G and Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language. Journal of religion and health. 2020;59:1080-95.
  • 12 Ersin F, Capik C, Kissal A, et al. Breast cancer fatalism scale: A validity and reliability study in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2018;11:783.
  • 13 Dayapoglu N, Ayyıldız Nİ and Şeker D. Determination of health fatalism and the factors affecting health fatalism in patients with epilepsy in the North of Turkey. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2021;115:107641.
  • 14 Alp Şahin İ. Akraba evliliği tutum ölçeği: Metodolojik bir çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
  • 15 Temel AB and Zühal A. Evaluation of validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Health Literacy Scale. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2017;25:85-94.
  • 16 Kaya A and Bozkur B. Kadercilik Eğilimi Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015;11.
  • 17 Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn Boston. Ma: Pearson. 2013.
  • 18 Jaber L, Romano O, Halpern GJ, et al. Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: survey among Israeli Arab adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.
  • 19 Sandridge AL, Takeddin J, Al-Kaabi E, et al. Consanguinity in Qatar: knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of biosocial science. 2010;42:59-82.
  • 20 Sedehi M, Keshtkar A and Golalipour MJ. The knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the North of Iran. Journal of clinical and diagnostic Research. 2012;6:1233-6.
  • 21 Middle I, Al-Salloum A, Al-Herbish A, et al. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1881-4.
  • 22 Al Salloum A, El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish A, et al. Prevalence of selected congenital anomalies in Saudi children: a community-based study. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2015;35:107-10.
  • 23 Anwar S, Taslem Mourosi J, Arafat Y, et al. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2020;15:e0241610.
  • 24 Hussain R and Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1998;30:261-75.
  • 25 Hussain R. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1999;31:449-61.
  • 26 Şen ŞR. Aydın il merkezinde akraba evliliği sıklığı ve gebelik sonuçları ile ilişkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2010.
  • 27 Samli H, Toprak D and Solak M. Afyonkarahisar ilinde Akraba Evlilikleri ve I Bunun Dogumsal Anomaliler ile Iliskisi. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2006;7.
  • 28 Al-Gazali L, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq Y, et al. consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of biosocial science. 1997;29:491-7.
  • 29 Alharbi OA, Al-Shaia WA, Al-Hamam AA, et al. Attitude of Saudi Arabian adults towards consanguineous marriage. Qatar Medical Journal. 2015;2015:12.
  • 30 Teeuw ME, Loukili G, Bartels EA, et al. Consanguineous marriage and reproductive risk: attitudes and understanding of ethnic groups practising consanguinity in Western society. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;22:452-7.
  • 31 Bener A and Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18:315–20-–20.
  • 32 Cho YI, Lee S-YD, Arozullah AM, et al. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Social science & medicine. 2008;66:1809-16.
  • 33 Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, De Vries E, et al. Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;167:14-21.
  • 34 Morris NS, Maclean CD and Littenberg B. Change in health literacy over 2 years in older adults with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2013;39:638-46.
  • 35 Biçer EB and Malatyali İ. Sağlık okuryazarlık düzeyinin belirlenmesi: Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi örneği. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2018;17:1-15.
  • 36 Temel AB and Çİmen Z. KRONİK HASTALIĞI OLAN YAŞLI BİREYLERDE SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIĞI, SAĞLIK ALGISI VE İLİŞKİLİ FAKTÖRLER. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;33:105-25.
  • 37 Acar GA, Baltaci K, Acimiş NM, et al. Bir Tekstil Fabrikasında Çalışanlarda Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Etmenler. 3. International 21. National Public Health Congress; 2019.
  • 38 Selvi A. Yakınında meme kanseri olan kadınların öğrenim gereksinimleri ile kadercilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa; 2019.
  • 39 Serİn M, Taştan A and Ayten A. Trafikte Sürücü Davranışı ve Dindarlık İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği. Erciyes Akademi.36:186-212.
  • 40 Orhan K. Validity and Reliability Study of Fatality Tendency Scale. Uluslararası Medeniyet Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2017;2:83-102.
  • 41 Charkazi A, Samimi A, Razzaghi K, et al. Adherence to recommended breast cancer screening in Iranian Turkmen women: the role of knowledge and beliefs. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013;2013.
  • 42 Denewer A, Farouk O, Mostafa WA, et al. Social support and hope among Egyptian women with breast cancer after mastectomy. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2011;5:BCBCR. S6655.
  • 43 Hwang JJ, Donnelly TT, Ewashen C, et al. Sociocultural influences on Arab women’s participation in breast cancer screening in Qatar. Qualitative health research. 2017;27:714-26.
  • 44 Powe BD, Hamilton J and Brooks P. Perceptions of cancer fatalism and cancer knowledge: a comparison of older and younger African American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2006;24:1-13.
  • 45 Kiraç R and Öztürk YE. HALKIN SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYİ İLE SAĞLIK KAYGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;23:214-43.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Halk Sağlığı, Çevre Sağlığı, Hemşirelik
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Metin Yıldız 0000-0003-0122-5677

Mehmet Salih Yıldırım 0000-0003-2632-4583

Ayse Elkoca 0000-0002-3936-4122

Yakup Sarpdağı 0000-0002-1608-649X

Muhammet Ali Aydın 0000-0002-2137-5114

Tuğçe Kabak 0000-0001-6621-5344

Gökhan Dege 0000-0001-9237-770X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Mart 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Yıldız M, Yıldırım MS, Elkoca A, Sarpdağı Y, Aydın MA, Kabak T, Dege G (01 Mart 2023) Consanguineous Marriage, Health Literacy and Fatalism Levels of Different Generations: A Descriptive-Correlational Study in A Sample from Turkey. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 2 197–207.