BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Pterygium After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis

Yıl 2012, Sayı: 2, 142 - 145, 01.06.2012

Öz

To prevent pterygium progression, no certain medical or surgical methods are known however sun glasses with an ultraviolet filter and hats are recommended. In our case, pterygium which developed 7 years after laser in situ keratomileusis LASIK did not progress for a follow-up period of 2.5 years as the flap edge acted as a barrier against progression. The course of pterygia after LASIK are not reported in the literature. Our case is important in two aspects that it both documents the course of pterygia after LASIK and the possible preventive effect of a corneal cut on the progression of early pterygia

Kaynakça

  • Marcovich AL, Bahar I, Srinivasan S, Slomovic AR. Surgical management of pterygium. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010; 50(3): 47-61.
  • Hirst LW. The treatment of pterygium. Survey Ophthalmol 2003; 48(2): 145-80.
  • Jaros PA, DeLuise VP. Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol 1988; 33(1):41–9.
  • Tan DT, Chee SP, Dear KBG, Lim AS. Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115(10): 1235–40.
  • Riordan-Eva P, Kielhorn I, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Kirkness CM. Conjunctival autografting in the surgical treatment of pterygium. Eye 1993; 7(5): 634–8.
  • Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G, Tseng SC. Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 1997; 104 (6): 974–85.
  • Akura J, Kaneda S, Matsuura K, Setogawa A, Takeda K, Honda S. Measures for preventing recurrence after pterygium surgery. Cornea 2001; 20(7): 703-7.
  • Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 1985; 92(11): 1461-70.
  • Allan BD, Short P, Crawford GJ, Barrett GD, Constable IJ. Pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting: an effective and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77(11): 698-701.
  • Massaoutis P, Khemka S, Ayliffe W. Clinical outcome of a modified surgical technique for pterygium excision. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006; 41(6): 704–8.
  • Syam PP, Eleftheriadis H, Liu CSC. Inferior conjunctival autograft for primary pterygia. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(4): 806-10.
  • Al Fayez MF. Limbal versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 2002; 109(9): 1752-5.
  • Young AL, Leung GY, Wong AK, Cheng LL, Lam DS. A randomized trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(8): 995-7.
  • Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82(3): 235–40.
  • Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakorn T, Suwan-Apichon O, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90(12): 1476–80.
  • Ku cukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea. 2007; 26(4): 407–13.
  • Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(4): 667-71.
  • Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(7): 911-4.
  • Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(9): 1206-10.
  • 20. Srin ivasan S, Dollin M, McAllum P, Berger Y, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR. Fibrin glue versus sutures for attaching the conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a prospective observer masked clinicial trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93(2): 215-8.
  • Dougherty PJ, Hardten DR, Lindstrom RL. Corneascleral melt after pterygium surgery using a single intraoperative application of mitomycin-C. Cornea 1996; 15(5): 537-40.
  • Safianik B, Ben-Zion I, Garzozi HJ. Serious corneoscleral complications after pterygium excision with mitomycin C. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86(3): 357-8.
  • Tsai Y Y, Lin JM, Shy JD. Acute scleral thinning after pterygium excision with intraoperative mitomycin C. Cornea 2002; 21(2): 227-9.
  • Avisar R, Avisar I, Bahar I, Weinberger D. Effect of mitomycin C in pterygium surgery on corneal endothelium. Cornea 2008; 27(5):559–61.
  • Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Lange AP, Slomovic A, Levinger E, Sansanayudh W, et al. The effect of mitomycin C on corneal endothelium in pterygium surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147(3): 447–52.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis Sonrası Pterjiyum

Yıl 2012, Sayı: 2, 142 - 145, 01.06.2012

Öz

Pterjiyumun ilerlemesini önlemek amacıyla ultraviyole filtreli güneş gözlüğü ve şapka kullanımı önerilmekte ancak ilerlemeyi kesin önleyici tıbbi veya cerrahi bir teknik bulunmamaktadır. Sunduğumuz olguda; laser in situ keratomileusis LASIK tedavisinden 7 yıl sonra gelişen pterjiyuma karşı flep kenarının bir bariyer görevi gördüğü ve pterjiyumun takip edildiği 2,5 yıl boyunca ilerlemediği izlenmiştir. Literatürde, LASIK sonrası gelişen pterjiyumların seyrine dair veri mevcut değildir. Olgumuz, hem LASIK sonrası bu seyri dökümante etmek, hem de erken evrede korneaya yapılacak bir kesinin pterjiyumu durdurucu etkisini sorgulamak açısından önem taşımaktadır

Kaynakça

  • Marcovich AL, Bahar I, Srinivasan S, Slomovic AR. Surgical management of pterygium. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010; 50(3): 47-61.
  • Hirst LW. The treatment of pterygium. Survey Ophthalmol 2003; 48(2): 145-80.
  • Jaros PA, DeLuise VP. Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol 1988; 33(1):41–9.
  • Tan DT, Chee SP, Dear KBG, Lim AS. Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115(10): 1235–40.
  • Riordan-Eva P, Kielhorn I, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Kirkness CM. Conjunctival autografting in the surgical treatment of pterygium. Eye 1993; 7(5): 634–8.
  • Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G, Tseng SC. Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 1997; 104 (6): 974–85.
  • Akura J, Kaneda S, Matsuura K, Setogawa A, Takeda K, Honda S. Measures for preventing recurrence after pterygium surgery. Cornea 2001; 20(7): 703-7.
  • Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 1985; 92(11): 1461-70.
  • Allan BD, Short P, Crawford GJ, Barrett GD, Constable IJ. Pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting: an effective and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77(11): 698-701.
  • Massaoutis P, Khemka S, Ayliffe W. Clinical outcome of a modified surgical technique for pterygium excision. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006; 41(6): 704–8.
  • Syam PP, Eleftheriadis H, Liu CSC. Inferior conjunctival autograft for primary pterygia. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(4): 806-10.
  • Al Fayez MF. Limbal versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 2002; 109(9): 1752-5.
  • Young AL, Leung GY, Wong AK, Cheng LL, Lam DS. A randomized trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(8): 995-7.
  • Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82(3): 235–40.
  • Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakorn T, Suwan-Apichon O, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90(12): 1476–80.
  • Ku cukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea. 2007; 26(4): 407–13.
  • Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(4): 667-71.
  • Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(7): 911-4.
  • Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(9): 1206-10.
  • 20. Srin ivasan S, Dollin M, McAllum P, Berger Y, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR. Fibrin glue versus sutures for attaching the conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a prospective observer masked clinicial trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93(2): 215-8.
  • Dougherty PJ, Hardten DR, Lindstrom RL. Corneascleral melt after pterygium surgery using a single intraoperative application of mitomycin-C. Cornea 1996; 15(5): 537-40.
  • Safianik B, Ben-Zion I, Garzozi HJ. Serious corneoscleral complications after pterygium excision with mitomycin C. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86(3): 357-8.
  • Tsai Y Y, Lin JM, Shy JD. Acute scleral thinning after pterygium excision with intraoperative mitomycin C. Cornea 2002; 21(2): 227-9.
  • Avisar R, Avisar I, Bahar I, Weinberger D. Effect of mitomycin C in pterygium surgery on corneal endothelium. Cornea 2008; 27(5):559–61.
  • Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Lange AP, Slomovic A, Levinger E, Sansanayudh W, et al. The effect of mitomycin C on corneal endothelium in pterygium surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147(3): 447–52.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Case Report
Yazarlar

C. Banu Coşar

A. Bozkurt Şener

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Coşar CB, Şener AB (01 Haziran 2012) Laser in situ Keratomileusis Sonrası Pterjiyum. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2 142–145.