BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Married Adult's Attitude Towards Domestic Violence: Turkish Experience

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 4, 265 - 270, 01.12.2014

Öz

Introduction: Domestic violence DV is a global problem with drastic effects on social life, representing a public health problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate the attitudes of married women and men towards DV in Turkey. Method: Attitude questions were directed to a group of male and female married individuals as a part of the Turkish Demographic and Health Survey TDHS in 1998. Participants were asked to express their opinions and attitudes about certain pre-determined scenarios, in an effort to ascertain whether violence against married women is justified or not by these individuals. Results: The TDHS 1998 included 5893 married women and 1971 married men. DV was approved by 50.7% and 56.9% of the married women and men, respectively. Approval rates of DV for any reason were highest among the youngest group of married individuals male and female and among the oldest married men. In addition, there was higher rate of approval for DV among married women from central and eastern Turkey, and from married men from eastern and southern Turkey. Higher level of education was associated with less approval for married men and women. Certain expressed views on social norms were associated with a significantly higher rate of approval for DV among married men and women. Conclusion: This study underscores the need for adequately identifying and assessing DV in Turkey. The victim blaming attitudes were common. Determining an individual’s disposition to commit DV by health care professionals would allow proactive preventive measures to be taken and to assess the risk level. This also will help sensitize the concerned agencies to implement and impose the necessary laws related to DV.

Kaynakça

  • Semahegn A, Belachew T, Abdulahi M. Domestic violence and its predictors among married women in reproductive age in Fagitalekoma Woreda, Awi zone, Amhara regional state, North Western Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2013;10:63.
  • Craparo G, Gori A, Petruccelli I, Cannella V, Simonelli C. Intimate Partner Violence: Relationships Between Alexithymia, Depression, Attachment Styles, and Coping Strategies of Battered Women. J Sex Med 2014;11:1484-1494.
  • Savas N, Agridag G. The relationship between women’s mental health and domestic violence in semirural areas: a study in Turkey. Asia Pac J Public Health 2011;23:399-407.
  • Mayda AS, Akkus D. Domestic violence against 116 Turkish housewives: a field study. Women Health 2004;40:95-108.
  • Kocacik F, Dogan O. Domestic violence against women in Sivas, Turkey: survey study. Croat Med J 2006;47:742-749.
  • Ergin N, Bayram N, Alper Z, Selimoglu K, Bilgel N. Domestic violence: a tragedy behind the doors. Women Health 2005;42:35-51.
  • Rani M, Bonu S. Attitudes toward wife beating: a cross-country study in Asia. J Interpers Violence 2009;24:1371-1397.
  • Uthman OA, Lawoko S, Moradi T. Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2009;9:14.
  • Hıdıroglu S, Topuzoglu A, Ay P, Karavus M. The assessment of the factors influencing physical violence against women and children: a primary health care center based study in Istanbul. Yeni Symposium 2006;44:196-202.
  • Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet 2002;359:1423-1429.
  • Rani M, Bonu S, Diop-Sidibe N. An empirical investigation of attitudes towards wife-beating among men and women in seven sub-Saharan African countries. Afr J Reprod Health 2004;8:116-136.
  • Babu BV, Kar SK. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: a population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health 2009;9:129.
  • Hamzeh B, Farshi MG, Laflamme L. Opinions of married women about potential causes and triggers of intimate partner violence against women. A cross-sectional investigation in an Iranian city. BMC Public Health 2008;8:209.
  • Hamzeh B, Garousi Farshi M, Laflamme L. Opinions about potential causes and triggers of intimate partner violence against women: a population-based study among married men from Kermanshah city, Iran. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2008;15:253-263.
  • Aksan HA, Aksu F. The training needs of Turkish emergency department personnel regarding intimate partner violence. BMC Public Health 2007;7:350.
  • Douki S, Nacef F, Belhadj A, Bouasker A, Ghachem R. Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Arch Womens Ment Health 2003;6:165-171.

EVLİ YETİŞKİNLERİN AİLE İÇİ ŞİDDETE YÖNELİK TUTUMU: TÜRKİYE DENEYİMİ

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 4, 265 - 270, 01.12.2014

Öz

Giriş: Aile içi şiddet AİŞ , sosyal hayat üzerinde ciddi etkileri olan küresel bir halk sağlığı sorunudur. Çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de evli kadın ve erkeklerin AİŞ’ye yönelik tutumlarını değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Tutum soruları, 1998’de yapılan Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması TNSA kapsamında evli erkek ve kadınlara yöneltildi. Katılımcılara önceden belirlenmiş senaryolar üzerinden evli kadına yönelik şiddeti onaylayıp onaylamadıkları soruldu. Bulgular: TNSA 1998, 5893 evli kadın ve 1971 evli erkeğin verilerini içeriyordu. AİŞ, evli kadınların % 50.7’si, evli erkeklerin% 56.9’u tarafından onaylandı. AİŞ senaryolarından herhangi birini en yüksek oranda onaylayanlar, evli bireylerin erkek ve kadın en genç grubunda olanlar ve evli erkeklerin en yaşlı grubunda olanlardı. Türkiye’nin orta ve doğusundan evli kadınlar, doğu ve güneyinden evli erkekler AİŞ’yi daha yüksek oranda onayladılar. Daha yüksek eğitim düzeyindeki evli erkek ve kadınlar, AİŞ’yi daha az oranda onayladılar. Sosyal normları benimsediğini ifade eden evli erkek ve kadınlar AİŞ’yi anlamlı olarak daha yüksek oranda onayladılar. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de AİŞ’nin belirlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi gereğinin altını çizmektedir. Kurbanı suçlayan tutum yaygındı. AİŞ ele alınırken sağlık profesyonellerinin bireysel duruşunun netleşmesi, proaktif önlemler alınmasına ve risk düzeyi değerlendirmesine olanak sağlayabilir. Çalışma aynı zamanda AİŞ ile ilgili gerekli yas

Kaynakça

  • Semahegn A, Belachew T, Abdulahi M. Domestic violence and its predictors among married women in reproductive age in Fagitalekoma Woreda, Awi zone, Amhara regional state, North Western Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2013;10:63.
  • Craparo G, Gori A, Petruccelli I, Cannella V, Simonelli C. Intimate Partner Violence: Relationships Between Alexithymia, Depression, Attachment Styles, and Coping Strategies of Battered Women. J Sex Med 2014;11:1484-1494.
  • Savas N, Agridag G. The relationship between women’s mental health and domestic violence in semirural areas: a study in Turkey. Asia Pac J Public Health 2011;23:399-407.
  • Mayda AS, Akkus D. Domestic violence against 116 Turkish housewives: a field study. Women Health 2004;40:95-108.
  • Kocacik F, Dogan O. Domestic violence against women in Sivas, Turkey: survey study. Croat Med J 2006;47:742-749.
  • Ergin N, Bayram N, Alper Z, Selimoglu K, Bilgel N. Domestic violence: a tragedy behind the doors. Women Health 2005;42:35-51.
  • Rani M, Bonu S. Attitudes toward wife beating: a cross-country study in Asia. J Interpers Violence 2009;24:1371-1397.
  • Uthman OA, Lawoko S, Moradi T. Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2009;9:14.
  • Hıdıroglu S, Topuzoglu A, Ay P, Karavus M. The assessment of the factors influencing physical violence against women and children: a primary health care center based study in Istanbul. Yeni Symposium 2006;44:196-202.
  • Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet 2002;359:1423-1429.
  • Rani M, Bonu S, Diop-Sidibe N. An empirical investigation of attitudes towards wife-beating among men and women in seven sub-Saharan African countries. Afr J Reprod Health 2004;8:116-136.
  • Babu BV, Kar SK. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: a population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health 2009;9:129.
  • Hamzeh B, Farshi MG, Laflamme L. Opinions of married women about potential causes and triggers of intimate partner violence against women. A cross-sectional investigation in an Iranian city. BMC Public Health 2008;8:209.
  • Hamzeh B, Garousi Farshi M, Laflamme L. Opinions about potential causes and triggers of intimate partner violence against women: a population-based study among married men from Kermanshah city, Iran. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2008;15:253-263.
  • Aksan HA, Aksu F. The training needs of Turkish emergency department personnel regarding intimate partner violence. BMC Public Health 2007;7:350.
  • Douki S, Nacef F, Belhadj A, Bouasker A, Ghachem R. Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Arch Womens Ment Health 2003;6:165-171.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Serpil Yaylacı

Tuba Cimilli Öztürk

Bedia Gülen

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Yaylacı S, Öztürk TC, Gülen B (01 Aralık 2014) EVLİ YETİŞKİNLERİN AİLE İÇİ ŞİDDETE YÖNELİK TUTUMU: TÜRKİYE DENEYİMİ. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 4 265–270.