BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

An Evaluation of The Doctoral Theses In The Field of Family Nursing In Turkey

Yıl 2020, Sayı: 2, 337 - 341, 01.06.2020

Öz

Objective: This study was performed to determine the features of doctoral theses in the field of family nursing in Turkey, and the distribution of the doctoral theses by their subjects. Study Design: Based on scanning of the concepts and departments, the data of this descriptive study were retrospectively obtained from the National Thesis Database Center of the Higher Education Council. Its search concept used the words, “family and home care”, and its search department used the word, “nursing”. The data were analyzed using a questionnaire consisted of 10 items developed by the researchers. The items included the date when the thesis was completed, study design, study subject, location of the research, study sample, sample size, interventions, model use and department. Results: This study obtained the complete texts of 46 doctoral theses. The evaluation found that 65.2% of the theses in the field of family nursing were made between the years of 2004 and 2016. In 54.3% of the theses, the sample group consists of relatives of the patients and near the half of the studies were half-experimental and 52.2% of them were done in clinics. Models were used by only 10.9% of the theses. Conclusion: Doctoral theses related to family nursing and home care increased in the 2000 s. They focused on caregivers due to increasing chronic diseases. The few family-based studies on protecting and developing health, one of the basic functions of the nurses, show that much more attention should be devoted to this field.

Kaynakça

  • Hanson SMH. Family heath care nursing: an introduction. In: Hanson SMH, Gedaly-Duff V, Kaakinen R, editors. Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice & Research, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2005. pp.3–35.
  • Özkan Ö, Çatiker A. Family health nursing: appearance in nursing occupation of health care privatization. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2007;10:91–104.
  • WHO. Health 21: the health for all policy frame work for the who european region. Denmark, World Health Organization 1999. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/98398/ wa540ga199heeng.pdf
  • Hennessy D, Gladin L. Report on the evaluation of the who multi-country family health nurse pilot study. Denmark, WHO Regional Office for Europe 2006. Available at: https:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107761/E88841. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Balci AS, Erol S. Being a nurse instead of personnel in a family health center. J Educ Res Nurs 2016;3:244–9. [CrossRef]
  • Official Gazette. Regulation on the amendment of the nursing regulation. Official Gazette Issue 2011;April 19:27910.
  • Tingen MS, Burnett AH, Murchison RB, Zhu H. The importance of nursing research. J Nurs Educ 2009;48:167–70. [CrossRef] need to be conducted in clinics and the field. Conducting further studies will enable researchers to address families as a whole in line with the principles of nursing care. In addition, using higher-evidence studies will contribute to the literature and nursing care practices. The use of mod- els in theses is recommended since it can standardize and guide nursing practices.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2006. pp.3–11.
  • Swanson JM. Health care delivery in Cuba: nursing’s role in achievement of the goal of ‘healthforall’. Int J Nurs Stud 1998;25:11– 21. [CrossRef]
  • Kaakinen JR, Coehlo DP, Steele R, Tabacco A, Hanson SMH. Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice, and Research, 5th ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2015. pp.8–31.
  • Arslan F, Uzun Ş, Oflaz F. Characteristics experienced difficulties and usage of doctoral dissertations in nursing in Turkey. Türkiye Klinikleri Hem Bil Derg 2010;2:110–2.
  • Lee JH, Choe MA, Hah YS, Kim K, Kim O, Suh YO, et al. Analysis of trends and contents of nursing doctoral dissertations in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012;42:302–9. [CrossRef]
  • Shin H, Sung KM, Jeong SH, Kim DR. Trends of doctoral dissertations in nursing science: focused on studies submitted since 2000. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi Jl 2000;38:74–82. [CrossRef]
  • Pietila AM. Analysis of doctoral theses in nursing science produced in Finland in the years 1982–1987. Hoitotiede 1990;2:158–64.
  • Şengün F, Üstün B, Bademli K. Exploration of theory/model based nursing research in Turkey. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2013;16:132–9.
  • McKenna H. Theory and Research: The Relationship Nursing Theories and Models. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. pp.190–221.

TÜRKİYE’DE AİLE HEMŞİRELİĞİ ALANINDA YAPILAN DOKTORA TEZLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2020, Sayı: 2, 337 - 341, 01.06.2020

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de aile hemşireliği konusunda yapılmış doktora tezlerinin özelliklerini ve konularına göre dağılımını belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma Planı: Tanımlayıcı tipte olan bu çalışmanın verileri geriye dönük olarak Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanından kavram ve anabilim dalı düzeyinde tarama yapılarak elde edilmiştir. Kavram taramasında, “aile, evde bakım”; anabilim dalı taramasında ise, “hemşirelik” kelimeleri kullanılmıştır. Tezler araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen 10 maddelik soru formu değerlendirilmiştir. Bunlar tezin tamamlanma yılı ve hangi anabilim dalında yapıldığı, örneklem grubu, araştırma tipi, araştırmanın yapıldığı yer, araştırma konusu, model kullanılma durumudur. Verilerin analizinde sayı ve yüzdelikler kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada tam metnine ulaşılan 46 doktora tezi incelenmiştir. Değerlendirme sonucunda aile hemşireliği alanında yapılan tezlerin %65,2’sinin 2004–2016 yılları arasında yapıldığı saptanmıştır. Tezlerin %54,3’ünün örneklem grubunu hasta yakınları oluşturmakta olup, çalışmaların yarısına yakını yarı deneyseldir ve %52,2’si klinikte yapılmıştır. Tezlerin sadece %10,9’unda model kullanılmıştır. Sonuç: Aile, aile hemşireliği ve evde bakıma yönelik yapılan doktora tezlerinin özellikle 2000’li yıllarda artış gösterdiği ve genellikle artan kronik hastalıklara bağlı olarak bakım vericilere yönelik yapıldığı görülmektedir. Hemşirelerin temel fonksiyonlarında birisi olan sağlığın korunması ve geliştirilmesinde aile temelli yapılan çalışmaların az olması bu alana daha fazla önem verilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Hanson SMH. Family heath care nursing: an introduction. In: Hanson SMH, Gedaly-Duff V, Kaakinen R, editors. Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice & Research, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2005. pp.3–35.
  • Özkan Ö, Çatiker A. Family health nursing: appearance in nursing occupation of health care privatization. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2007;10:91–104.
  • WHO. Health 21: the health for all policy frame work for the who european region. Denmark, World Health Organization 1999. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/98398/ wa540ga199heeng.pdf
  • Hennessy D, Gladin L. Report on the evaluation of the who multi-country family health nurse pilot study. Denmark, WHO Regional Office for Europe 2006. Available at: https:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107761/E88841. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Balci AS, Erol S. Being a nurse instead of personnel in a family health center. J Educ Res Nurs 2016;3:244–9. [CrossRef]
  • Official Gazette. Regulation on the amendment of the nursing regulation. Official Gazette Issue 2011;April 19:27910.
  • Tingen MS, Burnett AH, Murchison RB, Zhu H. The importance of nursing research. J Nurs Educ 2009;48:167–70. [CrossRef] need to be conducted in clinics and the field. Conducting further studies will enable researchers to address families as a whole in line with the principles of nursing care. In addition, using higher-evidence studies will contribute to the literature and nursing care practices. The use of mod- els in theses is recommended since it can standardize and guide nursing practices.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2006. pp.3–11.
  • Swanson JM. Health care delivery in Cuba: nursing’s role in achievement of the goal of ‘healthforall’. Int J Nurs Stud 1998;25:11– 21. [CrossRef]
  • Kaakinen JR, Coehlo DP, Steele R, Tabacco A, Hanson SMH. Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice, and Research, 5th ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2015. pp.8–31.
  • Arslan F, Uzun Ş, Oflaz F. Characteristics experienced difficulties and usage of doctoral dissertations in nursing in Turkey. Türkiye Klinikleri Hem Bil Derg 2010;2:110–2.
  • Lee JH, Choe MA, Hah YS, Kim K, Kim O, Suh YO, et al. Analysis of trends and contents of nursing doctoral dissertations in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012;42:302–9. [CrossRef]
  • Shin H, Sung KM, Jeong SH, Kim DR. Trends of doctoral dissertations in nursing science: focused on studies submitted since 2000. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi Jl 2000;38:74–82. [CrossRef]
  • Pietila AM. Analysis of doctoral theses in nursing science produced in Finland in the years 1982–1987. Hoitotiede 1990;2:158–64.
  • Şengün F, Üstün B, Bademli K. Exploration of theory/model based nursing research in Turkey. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2013;16:132–9.
  • McKenna H. Theory and Research: The Relationship Nursing Theories and Models. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. pp.190–221.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Zuhal Bahar

Kübra Pınar Gürkan

Nihal Gördes Aydoğdu

Deniz Aslı Dokuzcan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Bahar Z, Gürkan KP, Aydoğdu NG, Dokuzcan DA (01 Haziran 2020) TÜRKİYE’DE AİLE HEMŞİRELİĞİ ALANINDA YAPILAN DOKTORA TEZLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2 337–341.