Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2022, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 112 - 118, 01.01.2022

Gökçenur Gökçe , Mehmet Ali Yavan

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.973532

Abstract

References

  • 1. Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(2):e175-e181.
  • 2. Motwani MB, Biranjan R, Dhole A, Choudhary AB, Mohite A. A study to evaluate the shape and size of sella turcica and its correlation with the type of malocclusion on lateral cephalometric radiographs. IOSR-JDMS. 2017;16:126-32.
  • 3. Pisaneschi M, Kapoor G. Imaging the sella and parasellar region. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15(1):203-19.
  • 4. Bonneville JF, Dietemann JL. Radiology of the sella turcica. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
  • 5. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice: Elsevier Limited; 2016.
  • 6. Leonardi R, Farella M, Cobourne MT. An association between sella turcica bridging and dental transposition. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:461-5.
  • 7. Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:437-41.
  • 8. Gulsun A, Ilkay E, Ozge K, Kahraman G. Three‑dimensional assessment of the sella turcica: comparison between cleft lip and palate patients and skeletal malocclusion classes. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:977-83.
  • 9. Sathyanarayana HP, Kailasam V, Chitharanjan AB. Sella turcica-Its importance in orthodontics and craniofacial morphology. Dent Res J. 2013;10:571-5.
  • 10. Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:457-63.
  • 11. Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, Azimi F, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an iranian group. Iran J Radiol 2015;12(3): e16059.
  • 12. Kucia A, Jankowski T, Siewniak M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K, Szych Z, Wilk G. Sella turcica anomalies on lateral cephalometric radiographs of Polish children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43(8):20140165.
  • 13. Yasa Y, Ocak A, Bayrakdar IS, Duman SB, Gumussoy I. Morphometric Analysis of Sella Turcica Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28(1):e70-e74.
  • 14. Ugurlu M, Bayrakdar IS, Kahraman F, Oksayan R, Dagsuyu IM. Evaluation of the relationship between impacted canines and three-dimensional sella morphology. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42(1):23-9.
  • 15. Gordon MB, Bell AL. A roentgenographic study of the sella turcica in normal children. Endocrinology 1922;22:54-9.
  • 16. Davidoff LM, Epstein BS. The Abnormal Pneumoencephalogram. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Fibiger; 1950.
  • 17. Fournier AM, Denizet D. Omega shaped sella turcica. Mars Med 1965;102(6):503–9.
  • 18. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(6):597–604.
  • 19. Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(2):148-53.
  • 20. Celik-Karatas RM, Kahraman FB, Akin M. The shape and size of the sella turcica in Turkish subjects with different skeletal patterns. Eur J Med Sci 2015;2:65-71.
  • 21. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529-35.
  • 22. Shrestha GK, Pokharel PR, Gyawali R, Bhattarai B, Giri J. The morphology and bridging of the sella turcica in adult orthodontic patients. BMC oral health 2018;18:1-8.
  • 23. Silverman FN. Roentgen standards for size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol 1957;78:451–60.
  • 24. Kisling E. Cranial morphology in Down’s syndrome. A comparative roentgencephalo-metric study in adult males Thesis, Munksgaard, Copenhage; 1966.
  • 25. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, NY; 1940.
  • 26. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997;67:111-20.
  • 27. Meyer-Marcotty P, Weisschuh N, Dressler P, Hartmann J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Morphology of the sella turcica in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome with PITX2 mutation. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37(8):504-10.
  • 28. Cordero DR, Brugmann S, Chu Y, Bajpai R, Jame M, Helms JA. Cranial neural crest cells on the move: their roles in craniofacial development. Am J Medical Genet 2011;155:270–9.
  • 29. Björk A. Cranial base development: a follow-up x-ray study of the individual variation in growth occurring between the ages of 12 and 20 years and its relation to brain case and face development. Am J Orthod 1955;41:198-225.
  • 30. Melsen B. The cranial base: the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 1974;32:41-71.
  • 31. Shah A, Bashir U, Ilyas T. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal class I, II & III in patients presenting at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad. Pak Oral Dent J 2011;31:104-10.
  • 32. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod 2000;22(1):69–74.
  • 33. Camp JD. Normal and pathological anatomy of the sella turcica as revealed by roent-genograms. Am J Roentgenol 1924;12:143-56.
  • 34. Obayis KA, Al-Bustani AI. Clinical significance of Sella turcica morphologies and dimensions in relation to different skeletal patterns and skeletal maturity assessment. J Bagh College Dent 2012;24(2):120-6.
  • 35. Silveira BT, Fernandes KS, Trivino T, dos Santos LY, de Freitas CF. Assessment of the relationship between size, shape and volume of the sella turcica in class II and III patients prior to orthognathic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:577-588.
  • 36. Tejavathi Nagaraj R, James L, Keerthi I, Balraj L, Goswami RD. The size and morphology of sella turcica: a lateral cephalometric study. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg 2015;1:3–7.
  • 37. Turamanlar O, Öztürk K, Horata E, Acay MB. Morphometric assessment of sella turcica using CT scan. Int J Exp Clin Anat 2017;11(1):6–11.
  • 38. Preston CB. Pituitary fossa size and facial type. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979;75(3):259-63.
  • 39. Tepedino M, Laurenziello M, Guida L, Montaruli G, Troiano G, Chimenti C, Ciavarella D. Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in growing patients: an observational study on shape and dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):1-11.

Morphometric Assessment of the Sella Turcica in Different Morphologic Types of Class II Malocclusion: a Retrospective Study

Year 2022, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 112 - 118, 01.01.2022

Gökçenur Gökçe , Mehmet Ali Yavan

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.973532

Abstract

Objectives: Sella turcica is a substantial anatomic reference structure used to assess craniofacial growth and treatment changes in orthodontics. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the size and morphology of sella turcica in different subdivisions of Class II malocclusion and to compare it Class I craniofacial development.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted with 150 patient’s pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs. Good-quality lateral cephalometric radiographs with a prominent appearance of sella turcica were grouped into Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class I (control group). On lateral cephalograms, the length, diameter and depth of the sella turcica were gauged and morphological types of the sella turcica was detected. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis analysis with Dunn-Bonferroni test and Chi-square test were used (p <0.05).
Results: A significant difference was found in the length of the sella turcica in the Class II div 2 group (p <0.05) compared to the other groups. The differences in depth and diameter of the sella turcica among three groups were non-significant (p > 0.05). The appearance of the sella turcica was normal shaped in most of the subjects (60.6%). Conclusion: No significant difference was found among skeletal Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class I groups in terms of diameter and depth of the sella turcica. A smaller length of sella turcica was found in patients with Class II division 2 anomaly.

Keywords

sella turcica morphology size skeletal type

References

  • 1. Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(2):e175-e181.
  • 2. Motwani MB, Biranjan R, Dhole A, Choudhary AB, Mohite A. A study to evaluate the shape and size of sella turcica and its correlation with the type of malocclusion on lateral cephalometric radiographs. IOSR-JDMS. 2017;16:126-32.
  • 3. Pisaneschi M, Kapoor G. Imaging the sella and parasellar region. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15(1):203-19.
  • 4. Bonneville JF, Dietemann JL. Radiology of the sella turcica. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
  • 5. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice: Elsevier Limited; 2016.
  • 6. Leonardi R, Farella M, Cobourne MT. An association between sella turcica bridging and dental transposition. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:461-5.
  • 7. Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:437-41.
  • 8. Gulsun A, Ilkay E, Ozge K, Kahraman G. Three‑dimensional assessment of the sella turcica: comparison between cleft lip and palate patients and skeletal malocclusion classes. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:977-83.
  • 9. Sathyanarayana HP, Kailasam V, Chitharanjan AB. Sella turcica-Its importance in orthodontics and craniofacial morphology. Dent Res J. 2013;10:571-5.
  • 10. Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:457-63.
  • 11. Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, Azimi F, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an iranian group. Iran J Radiol 2015;12(3): e16059.
  • 12. Kucia A, Jankowski T, Siewniak M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K, Szych Z, Wilk G. Sella turcica anomalies on lateral cephalometric radiographs of Polish children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43(8):20140165.
  • 13. Yasa Y, Ocak A, Bayrakdar IS, Duman SB, Gumussoy I. Morphometric Analysis of Sella Turcica Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28(1):e70-e74.
  • 14. Ugurlu M, Bayrakdar IS, Kahraman F, Oksayan R, Dagsuyu IM. Evaluation of the relationship between impacted canines and three-dimensional sella morphology. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42(1):23-9.
  • 15. Gordon MB, Bell AL. A roentgenographic study of the sella turcica in normal children. Endocrinology 1922;22:54-9.
  • 16. Davidoff LM, Epstein BS. The Abnormal Pneumoencephalogram. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Fibiger; 1950.
  • 17. Fournier AM, Denizet D. Omega shaped sella turcica. Mars Med 1965;102(6):503–9.
  • 18. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(6):597–604.
  • 19. Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(2):148-53.
  • 20. Celik-Karatas RM, Kahraman FB, Akin M. The shape and size of the sella turcica in Turkish subjects with different skeletal patterns. Eur J Med Sci 2015;2:65-71.
  • 21. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529-35.
  • 22. Shrestha GK, Pokharel PR, Gyawali R, Bhattarai B, Giri J. The morphology and bridging of the sella turcica in adult orthodontic patients. BMC oral health 2018;18:1-8.
  • 23. Silverman FN. Roentgen standards for size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol 1957;78:451–60.
  • 24. Kisling E. Cranial morphology in Down’s syndrome. A comparative roentgencephalo-metric study in adult males Thesis, Munksgaard, Copenhage; 1966.
  • 25. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, NY; 1940.
  • 26. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997;67:111-20.
  • 27. Meyer-Marcotty P, Weisschuh N, Dressler P, Hartmann J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Morphology of the sella turcica in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome with PITX2 mutation. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37(8):504-10.
  • 28. Cordero DR, Brugmann S, Chu Y, Bajpai R, Jame M, Helms JA. Cranial neural crest cells on the move: their roles in craniofacial development. Am J Medical Genet 2011;155:270–9.
  • 29. Björk A. Cranial base development: a follow-up x-ray study of the individual variation in growth occurring between the ages of 12 and 20 years and its relation to brain case and face development. Am J Orthod 1955;41:198-225.
  • 30. Melsen B. The cranial base: the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 1974;32:41-71.
  • 31. Shah A, Bashir U, Ilyas T. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal class I, II & III in patients presenting at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad. Pak Oral Dent J 2011;31:104-10.
  • 32. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod 2000;22(1):69–74.
  • 33. Camp JD. Normal and pathological anatomy of the sella turcica as revealed by roent-genograms. Am J Roentgenol 1924;12:143-56.
  • 34. Obayis KA, Al-Bustani AI. Clinical significance of Sella turcica morphologies and dimensions in relation to different skeletal patterns and skeletal maturity assessment. J Bagh College Dent 2012;24(2):120-6.
  • 35. Silveira BT, Fernandes KS, Trivino T, dos Santos LY, de Freitas CF. Assessment of the relationship between size, shape and volume of the sella turcica in class II and III patients prior to orthognathic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:577-588.
  • 36. Tejavathi Nagaraj R, James L, Keerthi I, Balraj L, Goswami RD. The size and morphology of sella turcica: a lateral cephalometric study. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg 2015;1:3–7.
  • 37. Turamanlar O, Öztürk K, Horata E, Acay MB. Morphometric assessment of sella turcica using CT scan. Int J Exp Clin Anat 2017;11(1):6–11.
  • 38. Preston CB. Pituitary fossa size and facial type. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979;75(3):259-63.
  • 39. Tepedino M, Laurenziello M, Guida L, Montaruli G, Troiano G, Chimenti C, Ciavarella D. Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in growing patients: an observational study on shape and dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):1-11.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Gökçenur Gökçe 0000-0003-2121-0552

Mehmet Ali Yavan 0000-0002-2162-060X

Early Pub Date October 14, 2021
Publication Date January 1, 2022
Submission Date July 20, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Gökçe G, Yavan MA (January 1, 2022) Morphometric Assessment of the Sella Turcica in Different Morphologic Types of Class II Malocclusion: a Retrospective Study. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 1 112–118.
 Download Cover Image