Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2022,
Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 157 - 166, 01.01.2022
Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Donelan K, DesRoches CM, Dittus RS, Buerhaus P. Perspectives of physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1898–906.
- 2. Cafiero M. Nurse practitioners’ knowledge, experience, and intention to use health literacy strategies in clinical practice. J Health Commun. 2013;18(sup1):70–81.
- 3. Jefferies H, Chan KK. Multidisciplinary team working: is it both holistic and effective? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(2).
- 4. Rajeswaran L. Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of health sciences in Botswana. Heal Sci J. 2016;10(6):1.
- 5. Gemuhay HM, Kalolo A, Mirisho R, Chipwaza B, Nyangena E. Factors affecting performance in clinical practice among preservice diploma nursing students in Northern Tanzania. Nurs Res Pract. 2019;2019.
- 6. Koushali AN, Hajiamini Z, Ebadi A. Comparison of nursing students’ and clinical nurses’ attitude toward the nursing profession. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(5):375.
- 7. Aragaw Y, Sinishaw W, Daba W, Mekie M. Attitude of Nursing and Midwifery students towards clinical practice and its associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):205.
- 8. Organization WH. Global strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery 2016-2020.
- 9. Haugan G, Sørensen A-H, Hanssen I. The importance of dialogue in student nurses’ clinical education. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):438–42.
- 10. Jonsén E, Melender H-L, Hilli Y. Finnish and Swedish nursing students’ experiences of their first clinical practice placement—A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(3):297–302.
- 11. Bisholt B, Ohlsson U, Engström AK, Johansson AS, Gustafsson M. Nursing students’ assessment of the learning environment in different clinical settings. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(3):304–10.
- 12. McKenna L, Gilmour C, Biro MA, McIntyre M, Bailey C, Jones J, et al. Undergraduate midwifery students’ sense of belongingness in clinical practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(8):880–3.
- 13. Sharif F, Masoumi S. A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice. BMC Nurs. 2005;4(1):1–7.
- 14. Lim JY, Kim MA, Kim SY, Kim EJ, Lee JE, Ko YK. The effects of a cognitive-behavioral therapy on career attitude maturity, decision making style, and self-esteem of nursing students in Korea. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(8):731–6.
- 15. Ha E-H. Attitudes toward clinical practice in undergraduate nursing students: AQ methodology study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):733–9.
- 16. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları. Introd Sect master theses Total 189 citations, Introd Sect. 2011.
- 17. Turan İ, Şimşek Ü, Aslan H. Eğitim araştırmalarında likert ölçeği ve likert-tipi soruların kullanımı ve analizi. Sak Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2015;30(1):186–203.
- 18. DeVellis RF. Ölçek geliştirme. Kuram ve Uygulamalar (Çev Ed T Totan) Ankara Nobel Akad Yayıncılık. 2014.
- 19. Erkuş A. Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-I: Temel kavramlar ve işlemler (2. Baskı). Ankara Pegem Akad. 2014.
- 20. Şeker H, Gençdoğan B. Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme [Development of measurement tool in psychology and education]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. 2006.
- 21. Şencan H. Sosyal ve davranışsal bilimlerde bilimsel araştırma. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. 2007.
- 22. Pallant J. SPSS Kullanma Kılavuzu, Çev: Sibel Balcı ve Berat Ahi, 2. Baskı, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara. 2017.
- 23. Ho R. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. CRC press; 2006.
- 24. Tavsancıl E. Tutumlarin olcülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayin Dagitim. 2002.
- 25. Sönmez V, Alacapınar G. Sosyal bilimlerde ölçme aracı hazırlama. Anı Yayıncılık; 2016. 26. Can A. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS. Ankara Pegem Akad. 2017.
- 27. Buyukozturk S. Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara Pegem Akad. 2010.
- 28. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
- 29. Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar JL. OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. Int J Test. 2006;6(4):311–60.
- 30. Tezbaşaran AA. Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu (3. Sürüm). Mersin: e-kitap. 2008.
Yıl 2022,
Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 157 - 166, 01.01.2022
Öz
Purpose: In this study, it was aimed to develop the "Korzul clinical practice attitude scale" in order to determine the attitudes of students in health branch, who perform clinical practices such as nursing, midwifery and elderly care program, etc., towards clinical practice.
Methods and Materials: An experiment form consisting of 44 expressions validated in terms of language and psychometry was applied to a sample of 1203 participants, of which 68% were female and whose age range was 18-34 years. In order to test the reliability of the scale, the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient and test-retest consistency were calculated.
Results: The developed "Korzul clinical practice attitude scale" consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 25 items, and it can explain 52.9 of the total variance for clinical practice attitudes. The total score of the scale ranges from 25 to 125, and the increase in score means a positive attitude towards clinical practice. The general Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as .90, which indicates high reliability.
Conclusions: According to the results, it is observed that the "Korzul clinical practice attitude scale,"of which validity and reliability study was performed for the purpose of measuring attitudes towards clinical practice, can perform measurements in a valid and reliable way.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Donelan K, DesRoches CM, Dittus RS, Buerhaus P. Perspectives of physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1898–906.
- 2. Cafiero M. Nurse practitioners’ knowledge, experience, and intention to use health literacy strategies in clinical practice. J Health Commun. 2013;18(sup1):70–81.
- 3. Jefferies H, Chan KK. Multidisciplinary team working: is it both holistic and effective? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(2).
- 4. Rajeswaran L. Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of health sciences in Botswana. Heal Sci J. 2016;10(6):1.
- 5. Gemuhay HM, Kalolo A, Mirisho R, Chipwaza B, Nyangena E. Factors affecting performance in clinical practice among preservice diploma nursing students in Northern Tanzania. Nurs Res Pract. 2019;2019.
- 6. Koushali AN, Hajiamini Z, Ebadi A. Comparison of nursing students’ and clinical nurses’ attitude toward the nursing profession. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(5):375.
- 7. Aragaw Y, Sinishaw W, Daba W, Mekie M. Attitude of Nursing and Midwifery students towards clinical practice and its associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):205.
- 8. Organization WH. Global strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery 2016-2020.
- 9. Haugan G, Sørensen A-H, Hanssen I. The importance of dialogue in student nurses’ clinical education. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):438–42.
- 10. Jonsén E, Melender H-L, Hilli Y. Finnish and Swedish nursing students’ experiences of their first clinical practice placement—A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(3):297–302.
- 11. Bisholt B, Ohlsson U, Engström AK, Johansson AS, Gustafsson M. Nursing students’ assessment of the learning environment in different clinical settings. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(3):304–10.
- 12. McKenna L, Gilmour C, Biro MA, McIntyre M, Bailey C, Jones J, et al. Undergraduate midwifery students’ sense of belongingness in clinical practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(8):880–3.
- 13. Sharif F, Masoumi S. A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice. BMC Nurs. 2005;4(1):1–7.
- 14. Lim JY, Kim MA, Kim SY, Kim EJ, Lee JE, Ko YK. The effects of a cognitive-behavioral therapy on career attitude maturity, decision making style, and self-esteem of nursing students in Korea. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(8):731–6.
- 15. Ha E-H. Attitudes toward clinical practice in undergraduate nursing students: AQ methodology study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):733–9.
- 16. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları. Introd Sect master theses Total 189 citations, Introd Sect. 2011.
- 17. Turan İ, Şimşek Ü, Aslan H. Eğitim araştırmalarında likert ölçeği ve likert-tipi soruların kullanımı ve analizi. Sak Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2015;30(1):186–203.
- 18. DeVellis RF. Ölçek geliştirme. Kuram ve Uygulamalar (Çev Ed T Totan) Ankara Nobel Akad Yayıncılık. 2014.
- 19. Erkuş A. Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-I: Temel kavramlar ve işlemler (2. Baskı). Ankara Pegem Akad. 2014.
- 20. Şeker H, Gençdoğan B. Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme [Development of measurement tool in psychology and education]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. 2006.
- 21. Şencan H. Sosyal ve davranışsal bilimlerde bilimsel araştırma. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. 2007.
- 22. Pallant J. SPSS Kullanma Kılavuzu, Çev: Sibel Balcı ve Berat Ahi, 2. Baskı, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara. 2017.
- 23. Ho R. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. CRC press; 2006.
- 24. Tavsancıl E. Tutumlarin olcülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayin Dagitim. 2002.
- 25. Sönmez V, Alacapınar G. Sosyal bilimlerde ölçme aracı hazırlama. Anı Yayıncılık; 2016. 26. Can A. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS. Ankara Pegem Akad. 2017.
- 27. Buyukozturk S. Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara Pegem Akad. 2010.
- 28. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
- 29. Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar JL. OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. Int J Test. 2006;6(4):311–60.
- 30. Tezbaşaran AA. Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu (3. Sürüm). Mersin: e-kitap. 2008.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Research Article |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 14 Ekim 2021 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ocak 2022 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 25 Temmuz 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 |
