Research Article

The Effect of Trust in Politicians and Perceptions of Macro Control on Attitudes towards Vaccines During the Covid-19 Pandemic Process

Volume: 13 Number: 3 July 1, 2022
EN

The Effect of Trust in Politicians and Perceptions of Macro Control on Attitudes towards Vaccines During the Covid-19 Pandemic Process

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of trust in politicians and perceptions of macro control on positive and negative attitudes towards vaccines during the Covid-19 pandemic process. Method: This is a cross-sectional field study. 1198 Turkish citizens at the age of 18 and over filled out an online questionnaire between May 6 and June 6, 2021. The questionnaire form consists of the scales of Trust in Politicians, Perception of Pandemic Macro Control, Attitudes towards Vaccines in addition to the demographic variables. In the analysis of the data, frequency, reliability, correlation, and regression analyzes were performed using the SPSS V.26 program, respectively. Results: Trust in politicians during the pandemic process has a statistically significant and positive effect on the perception of pandemic macro control. While trust in politicians and perception of pandemic macro control have a statistically significant and positive effect on positive attitude towards vaccines, they have a negative effect on a negative attitude towards vaccines. Conclusion: It was concluded that the trust in politicians and the perception of the adequacy of macro control measures taken by governments play an important role in people's adopting a positive attitude towards the developed vaccines to fight against the Covid-19, which has turned into a global pandemic.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. CDC. Social Distancing: Keep a Safe Distance to Slow the Spread. Cenders for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. (Accesed: 01.09.2021). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/social-distancing.html.
  2. 2. Desai AN, Aronoff DM. Masks and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Patient Page. 2020; 323(20): 2103. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6437.
  3. 3. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboni E, Phan T, Eikenberry K, Kuang Y, . . . Gumel AB. To Mask or Not to Mask: Modeling the Potential for Face Mask Use by the General Public to Curtail the COVID-19 Pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling. 2020; 5: 293-308. doi:10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001.
  4. 4. Regalado A. What is Herd Immunity and can it Stop the Coronavirus? MIT Technology Review. 2020. (Accesed: 01.09.2021). Available from: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/03/17/905244/what-is-herd-immunity-and-can-it-stop-the-coronavirus/.
  5. 5. Tirupathi R, Bharathidasan K, Palabindala V, Salim SA, Al-Tawfiq JA. Comprehensive Review of Mask Utility and Challenges during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Le Infezioni in Medicina. 2020; 28(suppl 1): 57-63.
  6. 6. Wnuk A, Oleksy T, Maison D. The Acceptance of Covid-19 Tracking Technologies: The Role of Perceived Threat, Lack of Control, and Ideological Beliefs. Plos One. 2020; 15(9): e0238973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238973.
  7. 7. Van der Weerd W, Timmermans DR, Beaujean DJ, Oudhoff J, Van Steenbergen JE. Monitoring the Level of Government Trust, Risk Perception and Intention of the General Public to Adopt Protective Measures during the Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic in the Netherlands. BMC public health. 2011; 11(1): 575. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-575.
  8. 8. Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and Attitudinal Determinants of Protective Behaviours during a Pandemic: A Review. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2010; 15(4): 797–824. doi:10.1348/135910710X485826.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Policy

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 1, 2022

Submission Date

January 26, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 19, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 13 Number: 3

EndNote
Türkmen İ, Kaya RR, Ersan H (July 1, 2022) The Effect of Trust in Politicians and Perceptions of Macro Control on Attitudes towards Vaccines During the Covid-19 Pandemic Process. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 3 450–456.

Cited By