Öz
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the most watched YouTube videos regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Methods The first fifty most watched videos for search term “Carpal Tunnel Syndrome” on YouTube, meeting inclusion criteria are included and evaluated by two researchers with DISCERN, JAMA and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Informational Assessment (CTSIA) scores, under the groups of physicians, health channels and other sources. Results There were statistically significant positive correlation between scoring systems, including CTSIA. No statistically significant correlation was found between video source and number of views, and between video source and view rate. There was no correlation between video source and number of views, and between video source and view rate. There was a relation between video source and DISCERN, JAMA, and CTSIA scores which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The videos uploaded by doctors and health channels had higher DISCERN scores than other sources (p=0.025 and 0.024, respectively), the videos uploaded by health channels had higher JAMA scores than other sources (p=0.013), and the videos uploaded by doctors had higher CTSIA scores than other sources. Conclusion Informational quality of videos about CTS is insufficient, even for physician videos although these are better than other sources. There is a clear need for guidelines and scoring systems for online medical information videos since internet is accepted and used as the ultimate information source.
Anahtar Kelimeler
carpal tunnel syndrome YouTube patient education medical informational video
Kaynakça
- Shi Q, Bobos P, Lalone EA, Warren L, MacDermid JC. Comparison of the Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Surgery and Nonsurgical Intervention in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hand (N Y). 2020;15(1):13-22.
- https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/ accessed in 11 October 2021
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.
- Mert, A., Bozgeyik, B. Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube. JOIO (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00430-5
- Ozdemir O, Diren F, Boyali O, Civelek E, Kabatas S. Metric Evaluation of Reliability and Transparency of the Videos About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery in the Online Platforms: Assessment of YouTube Videos' Content. Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):363-368.
- Goyal R, Mercado AE, Ring D, Crijns TJ. Most YouTube Videos About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Have the Potential to Reinforce Misconceptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(10):2296-2302.
- MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):136-42.
- Aydin MA, Akyol H. Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35(3):599-605.
- Baker JD, Baig Y, Siyaji ZK, Hornung AL, Zavras AG, Mallow GM, Zbeidi S, Shepard NA, Sayari AJ. Assessing the Quality and Credibility of Publicly Available Videos on Cervical Fusion: Is YouTube a Reliable Educational Tool? Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(4):669-675.
- Radonjic, A., Evans, E.L. & Malic, C. YouTube as a source of patient information for carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Plast Surg 2020;43:675–677.
- Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Abousayed M, Hush-Mendy SF, DiPreta JA. Evaluating the quality, accuracy, and readability of online resources pertaining to hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9:17-23. 25.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king?: an objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82469.
- Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002.
- Hungerford DS. Internet access produces misinformed patients: managing the confusion. Orthopedics. 2009; 32:9.
- Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2566–71.
- Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, Baker JF. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):840–5
Öz
Kaynakça
- Shi Q, Bobos P, Lalone EA, Warren L, MacDermid JC. Comparison of the Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Surgery and Nonsurgical Intervention in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hand (N Y). 2020;15(1):13-22.
- https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/ accessed in 11 October 2021
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.
- Mert, A., Bozgeyik, B. Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube. JOIO (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00430-5
- Ozdemir O, Diren F, Boyali O, Civelek E, Kabatas S. Metric Evaluation of Reliability and Transparency of the Videos About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery in the Online Platforms: Assessment of YouTube Videos' Content. Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):363-368.
- Goyal R, Mercado AE, Ring D, Crijns TJ. Most YouTube Videos About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Have the Potential to Reinforce Misconceptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(10):2296-2302.
- MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):136-42.
- Aydin MA, Akyol H. Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35(3):599-605.
- Baker JD, Baig Y, Siyaji ZK, Hornung AL, Zavras AG, Mallow GM, Zbeidi S, Shepard NA, Sayari AJ. Assessing the Quality and Credibility of Publicly Available Videos on Cervical Fusion: Is YouTube a Reliable Educational Tool? Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(4):669-675.
- Radonjic, A., Evans, E.L. & Malic, C. YouTube as a source of patient information for carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Plast Surg 2020;43:675–677.
- Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Abousayed M, Hush-Mendy SF, DiPreta JA. Evaluating the quality, accuracy, and readability of online resources pertaining to hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9:17-23. 25.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king?: an objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82469.
- Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002.
- Hungerford DS. Internet access produces misinformed patients: managing the confusion. Orthopedics. 2009; 32:9.
- Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2566–71.
- Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, Baker JF. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):840–5
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Klinik Tıp Bilimleri |
| Bölüm | Research Article |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ekim 2022 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 16 Kasım 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4 |
