Research Article

Long-term outcomes and complications of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Review of 48 Patients

Volume: 13 Number: 4 October 1, 2022
EN

Long-term outcomes and complications of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Review of 48 Patients

Abstract

Objectives: Periprosthetic fractures, especially periprosthetic proximal femur fractures, are an increasingly important orthopaedic problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term results, mortality and complications of periprosthetic fractures. Methods: Patients who had proximal femur periprosthetic fracture were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with Vancouver type B1 and C were treated with plate-screw osteosynthesis and patients with Vancouver type B2 were operated using revision femoral systems. Follow-up was evaluated by clinical and radiographic, and functional results were assessed by Gos scoring. Results: Totally 48 patients were evaluated retrospectively. 16 patients (33.3%) were type B1, 18 patients (37.5%) were type B2 and 14 patients (29.2%) were type C. 30 patients (62.5%) with type B1 and C were treated with plate screw osteosynthesis and 18 patients (37.5%) with type B2 treated with revision femoral systems. There was a significant correlation between the surgical method applied and both mortality and preop/postop GOS scoring systems (p <0.05). Complications and/or the need for intensive care were seen in 28 patients (58.3%) only 1(2.1%) of these was due to iatrogenic. In total, 20 patients (41.7%) from 48 patients could complete the procedure without any problems. Conclusion: As a result of our study, 58% of patients with periprosthetic femur fractures had complications and need intensive care during the treatment process. Periprosthetic proximal femur fractures, which are generally seen in the elderly population, are injuries with very high complication, mortality and morbidity rates. Therefore, it is recommended that surgeons pay maximum attention during the treatment process.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around total hip arthroplasty. Injury 2007; 38: 651–654.
  2. 2. Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, et al. Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1215.
  3. 3. Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, et al. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2658.
  4. 4. Pavlou G, Pantaliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, et al. A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures, stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int 2011; 21: 21–29.
  5. 5. Park, J. S., Hong, S., Nho, J. H., Kang, D., Choi, H. S., & Suh, Y. S. (2019). Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 53(1), 24-29.
  6. 6. Gülşen, M., Karatosun, V., & Uyulgan, B. (2011). The biomechanical assessment of fixation methods in periprosthetic femur fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 45(4), 266-269.
  7. 7. Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Di Cesare PE. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15: 177–180
  8. 8. Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, DiCesare PE. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 523–528.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 1, 2022

Submission Date

April 8, 2022

Acceptance Date

July 6, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 13 Number: 4

EndNote
Yavuz İA, Koçak C, İnci F, Ceyhan E, Yildirim AÖ, Öken F (October 1, 2022) Long-term outcomes and complications of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Review of 48 Patients. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 4 514–519.