Long-term outcomes and complications of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Review of 48 Patients
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1. Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around total hip arthroplasty. Injury 2007; 38: 651–654.
- 2. Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, et al. Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1215.
- 3. Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, et al. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2658.
- 4. Pavlou G, Pantaliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, et al. A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures, stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int 2011; 21: 21–29.
- 5. Park, J. S., Hong, S., Nho, J. H., Kang, D., Choi, H. S., & Suh, Y. S. (2019). Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 53(1), 24-29.
- 6. Gülşen, M., Karatosun, V., & Uyulgan, B. (2011). The biomechanical assessment of fixation methods in periprosthetic femur fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 45(4), 266-269.
- 7. Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Di Cesare PE. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15: 177–180
- 8. Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, DiCesare PE. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 523–528.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Orthopaedics
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Cahit Koçak
0000-0002-6735-6031
Türkiye
Fatih İnci
0000-0002-7960-4880
Türkiye
Erman Ceyhan
0000-0002-8095-6058
Türkiye
Fuad Öken
0000-0002-3091-9697
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 1, 2022
Submission Date
April 8, 2022
Acceptance Date
July 6, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 13 Number: 4