Öz
Kaynakça
- 1 Smith C. By the numbers: 180þ interesting Instagram statistics. Digital Company Stats; 2016. http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/important- instagram-stats/ [accessed 01.10.21].
- 2 Statista. Global Digital Population as of October 2020. 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digitalpopulationworldwide/#::text=Almost%204.57%20billion%20people%20were,percent%20of% 20total%20internet%20users. Accessed june 2021.
- 3 Ahmed S, Haines-Saah RJ, Afzal AR, et al. User-driven conversations about dialysis through Facebook: a qualitative thematic analysis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2017;22:301–307.
- 4 PWC Health Research Institute. Social Media “Likes” Healthcare: From Marketing to Social Business. 2012. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/ en/industries/health-industries/library/health-care-social-media.html. Accessed june 2021
- 5 Mayo Clinic. Health care social media list. 2013. Available at: http:// network.socialmedia.mayoclinic.org/hcsml-grid/. Accessed 2021.
- 6 Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Cornaghie MM, et al. Social Media in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery: An Analysis of Twitter and Instagram. Int J Sports Med. 2018;39:564-570.
- 7 Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Haeberle HS, et al. Social Media and Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Patient Utilization on Instagram. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2694-2700.
- 8 Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, Brown BT. Management of rotator cuff tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):399-408.
- 9 Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD (2015) Patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a social media analysis. Aesthet Surg J 36(1):NP1– NP5
- 10 Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Mistry JB, et al. Time Burden of Standardized Hip Questionnaires. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:280-4.
- 11 Mistry JB, Jauregui JJ, Lerner AL,et al. An Assessment of the Comprehensiveness of Various Hip Outcome Scores. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:267-74. Review.
- 12 Jenkins EL, Ilicic J, Barklamb AM, McCaffrey TA. Assessing the Credibility and Authenticity of Social Media Content for Applications in Health Communication: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 23;22(7):e17296. doi: 10.2196/17296. PMID: 32706675; PMCID: PMC7413282.
- 13 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1560e72.
- 14 Ramkumar PN, La T, Fisch E, Jones KJ, Taylor SA. Integrating Social Media and ACL Surgery: An analysis of patient, surgeon, and hospital utilization. Arthroscopy 2017;33:579e85.
- 15 Pappou IP, Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, et al. AAOS appropriate use criteria: optimizing the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:772e775.
- 16 Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, et al. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:116–121
- 17 Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, et al. Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:965e971.
- 18 Kjær BH, Magnusson SP, Warming S, et al. Progressive early passive and active exercise therapy after surgical rotator cuff repair - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the CUT-N-MOVE trial). Trials. 2018;19:470.
- 19 Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, et al. The Ethical and Professional Use of Social Media in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:388e-398e.
- 20 Hughes H, Hughes A, Murphy C. The Use of Twitter by the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity, Impact Factor, and Alternative Metrics. Cureus. 2017;9:e1931.
- 21 Hussain A, Muzzammil M, Butt F, et al. Effectiveness Of Plain Shoulder Radiograph In Detecting Degenerate Rotator Cuff Tears. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30:8-11.
- 22 Saranto K, Kivekäs E, Kinnunen UM, Palojoki S. Lack of Patient Data Privacy Challenges Patient Safety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:163-166
Öz
Purpose: The purpose of this observational study is to investigate the content of social media posts shared with the hashtags [#rotatorcuffsurgery], [#rotatorcuff repair] and [#rotatorcuff]. In particular, we analyzed the contents of posts for timing and perspective, tone, patient’s satisfaction and content.
Methods: Posts shared in the Instagram database with the [#rotatorcuffsurgery], [#rotatorcuff repair], and [#rotatorcuff] hashtags from September 1, 2019, to September 1, 2020, were analyzed and categorized by three separate reviewers. Of all 1785 posts, 142 were excluded since they were not related to orthopedic surgery and 12 were excluded due to inter-reviewer disagreements. Finally, 1631 posts shared by patients and surgeons were identified for final analysis in terms of perspective, timing, tone and the content of the posts.
Results: Of the 1631 posts included in the study, 1140 were shared by patients and their acquaintances, whereas 491 posts were shared by orthopedic surgeons. Posts shared by patients and their acquaintances mainly focused on rehabilitation (66%), daily activities (12%) and surgical site (10%), whereas, posts shared by surgeons mainly focused on intraoperative images (52%) and postoperative patient images (29%).
Conlusions: Patients were found to share their surgical experiences in a positive tone and they particularly focused on the rehabilitation process. Whereas orthopedic surgeons commonly shared intraoperative images, probably to better market themselves. Our findings show that the social media posts of patients who undergo rotator cuff surgery may provide important data in the understanding of patients' expectations from rotator cuff surgery.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Social media Instagram Rotator Cuff Surgery Shoulder Rehabilitation
Kaynakça
- 1 Smith C. By the numbers: 180þ interesting Instagram statistics. Digital Company Stats; 2016. http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/important- instagram-stats/ [accessed 01.10.21].
- 2 Statista. Global Digital Population as of October 2020. 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digitalpopulationworldwide/#::text=Almost%204.57%20billion%20people%20were,percent%20of% 20total%20internet%20users. Accessed june 2021.
- 3 Ahmed S, Haines-Saah RJ, Afzal AR, et al. User-driven conversations about dialysis through Facebook: a qualitative thematic analysis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2017;22:301–307.
- 4 PWC Health Research Institute. Social Media “Likes” Healthcare: From Marketing to Social Business. 2012. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/ en/industries/health-industries/library/health-care-social-media.html. Accessed june 2021
- 5 Mayo Clinic. Health care social media list. 2013. Available at: http:// network.socialmedia.mayoclinic.org/hcsml-grid/. Accessed 2021.
- 6 Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Cornaghie MM, et al. Social Media in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery: An Analysis of Twitter and Instagram. Int J Sports Med. 2018;39:564-570.
- 7 Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Haeberle HS, et al. Social Media and Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Patient Utilization on Instagram. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2694-2700.
- 8 Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, Brown BT. Management of rotator cuff tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):399-408.
- 9 Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD (2015) Patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a social media analysis. Aesthet Surg J 36(1):NP1– NP5
- 10 Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Mistry JB, et al. Time Burden of Standardized Hip Questionnaires. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:280-4.
- 11 Mistry JB, Jauregui JJ, Lerner AL,et al. An Assessment of the Comprehensiveness of Various Hip Outcome Scores. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:267-74. Review.
- 12 Jenkins EL, Ilicic J, Barklamb AM, McCaffrey TA. Assessing the Credibility and Authenticity of Social Media Content for Applications in Health Communication: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 23;22(7):e17296. doi: 10.2196/17296. PMID: 32706675; PMCID: PMC7413282.
- 13 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1560e72.
- 14 Ramkumar PN, La T, Fisch E, Jones KJ, Taylor SA. Integrating Social Media and ACL Surgery: An analysis of patient, surgeon, and hospital utilization. Arthroscopy 2017;33:579e85.
- 15 Pappou IP, Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, et al. AAOS appropriate use criteria: optimizing the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:772e775.
- 16 Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, et al. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:116–121
- 17 Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, et al. Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:965e971.
- 18 Kjær BH, Magnusson SP, Warming S, et al. Progressive early passive and active exercise therapy after surgical rotator cuff repair - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the CUT-N-MOVE trial). Trials. 2018;19:470.
- 19 Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, et al. The Ethical and Professional Use of Social Media in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:388e-398e.
- 20 Hughes H, Hughes A, Murphy C. The Use of Twitter by the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity, Impact Factor, and Alternative Metrics. Cureus. 2017;9:e1931.
- 21 Hussain A, Muzzammil M, Butt F, et al. Effectiveness Of Plain Shoulder Radiograph In Detecting Degenerate Rotator Cuff Tears. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30:8-11.
- 22 Saranto K, Kivekäs E, Kinnunen UM, Palojoki S. Lack of Patient Data Privacy Challenges Patient Safety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:163-166
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Ortopedi |
| Bölüm | Research Article |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 15 Kasım 2022 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ocak 2023 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 27 Ağustos 2022 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1 |
