Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 - Cumhuriyet'in 100. Yılına Armağan Sayısı, 523 - 527, 01.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1342369

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(1):11-v.
  • Frey E, Bonfiglioli C, Brunner M, Frawley J. Parents' Use of Social Media as a Health Information Source for Their Children: A Scoping Review. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):526-539. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.006
  • Bai G, Fu K, Fu W, Liu G. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:924748.
  • Freeman B, Chapman S. Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco control. 2007;16:207-10
  • Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. 2014;8:481-90.
  • Ergul A. Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Surgical Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas. Cureus. 2021;13:e20044.
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–111
  • Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten SV. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–2077
  • van der Bend DLM, Jakstas T, van Kleef E, Shrewsbury VA, Bucher T. Adolescents' exposure to and evaluation of food promotions on social media: a multi-method approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):74.
  • Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube: Pregnancy and COVID-19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(2):189-193.
  • Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obesity surgery, 2019; 29, 1477-84.
  • Kılınç DD; Sayar G. Assessment of reliability of YouTube videos on orthodontics. Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2019, 32: 145-150.
  • Sevgili E, Baytaroglu C. The role of Youtube as an information source about coronary artery disease during COVID-19 pandemic. Med Bull Haseki. 2021;1:1-6.
  • Kanber EM, Koseoglu M. Evaluation of YouTube Videos Quality of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Anesthesia. Istanbul Medical Journal. 2023;24.2.
  • Cetin HK, Koramaz I, Zengin M, Demir T. The Evaluation of YouTube™ English Videos’ Quality About Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital. 2023;57(1), 130.

The Evaluation of YouTube Videos’ Quality About Pediatric Urological Diseases

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 - Cumhuriyet'in 100. Yılına Armağan Sayısı, 523 - 527, 01.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1342369

Öz

Purpose: To evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on pediatric urological diseases (PUD).
Methods: This study was performed between 1 August - 7 August 2023. Turkish YouTube videos related to 'paediatric urology', 'circumcision', 'undescended testis', 'phimosis', 'hypospadias', 'vesicoureteral reflux', 'nocturnal enuresis' and 'testicular torsion' were evaluated. The videos were divided into professional (doctor, nurse, hospital, etc.) and non-professional (patient, patient relatives, news, etc.) according to the uploading source. Video characteristics (number of views, video length, likes, dislikes and comments) were compared between the groups. Video quality was assessed with DISCERN and Global Quality Score (GQS).
Results: A total of 498 videos, 312 professional videos and 186 non-professional videos, were included in the study. The number of views and likes were statistically significantly higher in the professional video group than in the non-professional video group (p=0.001 for both parameters). Mean DISCERN score and GQS score were significantly higher in the professional group than in the non-professional group (p=0.001, and p=0.001; respectively).
Conclusion: Professional videos about PUD had significantly higher quality and reliability according to DISCERN score and GQS. Moreover, YouTube videos uploaded by professional health care providers had significantly higher ‘view’ number, and ‘like’ number.

Kaynakça

  • Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(1):11-v.
  • Frey E, Bonfiglioli C, Brunner M, Frawley J. Parents' Use of Social Media as a Health Information Source for Their Children: A Scoping Review. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):526-539. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.006
  • Bai G, Fu K, Fu W, Liu G. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:924748.
  • Freeman B, Chapman S. Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco control. 2007;16:207-10
  • Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. 2014;8:481-90.
  • Ergul A. Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Surgical Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas. Cureus. 2021;13:e20044.
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–111
  • Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten SV. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–2077
  • van der Bend DLM, Jakstas T, van Kleef E, Shrewsbury VA, Bucher T. Adolescents' exposure to and evaluation of food promotions on social media: a multi-method approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):74.
  • Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube: Pregnancy and COVID-19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(2):189-193.
  • Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obesity surgery, 2019; 29, 1477-84.
  • Kılınç DD; Sayar G. Assessment of reliability of YouTube videos on orthodontics. Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2019, 32: 145-150.
  • Sevgili E, Baytaroglu C. The role of Youtube as an information source about coronary artery disease during COVID-19 pandemic. Med Bull Haseki. 2021;1:1-6.
  • Kanber EM, Koseoglu M. Evaluation of YouTube Videos Quality of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Anesthesia. Istanbul Medical Journal. 2023;24.2.
  • Cetin HK, Koramaz I, Zengin M, Demir T. The Evaluation of YouTube™ English Videos’ Quality About Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital. 2023;57(1), 130.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Üroloji
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Hakan Cakir 0009-0003-7341-8360

Ufuk Çağlar 0000-0002-4832-9396

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 4 Eylül 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ekim 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Ağustos 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 - Cumhuriyet'in 100. Yılına Armağan Sayısı

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Cakir H, Çağlar U (01 Ekim 2023) The Evaluation of YouTube Videos’ Quality About Pediatric Urological Diseases. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 4 523–527.