Araştırma Makalesi
The Relationship Between Social Support and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Primiparous Pregnant Women
Öz
Background/Purpose: Study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between social support and breastfeeding efficacy in primiparous pregnant women.
Methods: The study, which was carried out as a descriptive and relational screening, was completed with the participation of 350 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria. In the collection of the study data, a questionnaire form, Prenatal Breastfeeding Self Efficacy Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support were employed.
Results: In the present study, a positive relationship was determined between the pregnant women’s breastfeeding self-efficacy and perceived social support.
Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was concluded that as the social support provided to pregnant women in the prenatal period increased, their breastfeeding self efficacy also increased.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Perceived social support breastfeeding self-efficacy prenatal
Proje Numarası
yok
Kaynakça
- 1. Corby K, Kane D, Dayus D. Investigating predictors of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy. CJNR. 2021:53(1);56-63. DOI: 10.1177/0844562119888363
- 2. Erkal Aksoy YE, Bay H, Yilmaz SD. Factors affecting primiparous women’s breastfeeding self-efficacy levels. Clinical Lactation. 2022:13(2);100-111. DOI: 10.1891/CL-2021-0016
- 3. Denoual H, Dargentas M, Roudaut S, et al. Father’s role in supporting breastfeeding of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016:6(6);104-70. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010470
- 4. Gumusdas M and Ejder Apay S. The relationship between the marital adjustment and social support in pregnancy. Journal of Health Scıence and Professıons. 2016:3(1);1-8. DOI: 10.17681/hsp.16572
- 5. Bazzano AN, Kaji A, Felker-Kantor,E, et al. Qualitative studies of infant and young child feeding in lower-income countries: a systematic review and synthesis of dietary patterns. Nutrients. 2017:9(10);1140. DOI: 10.3390/nu9101140
- 6. Wells KJ, Thompson NJ, Kloeblen-Tarver AS. Development and psychometric testing of the prenatal breast-feeding self-efficacy scale. Am J Health Behav. 2006:30(2);177-187. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.30.2.7
- 7. Aydin A and Pasinlioglu T. Reliability and validity of a turkish version of the prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy scale. Midwifery. 2018:64;11-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007
- 8. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1990:55(3-4);610-617. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095
- 9. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Çok Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychology. 2001:12(1);17-25.
- 10. Nazari M, Ghasemi S, Vafaei H, et al. The perceived social support and its relationship with some of the demographic characteristics in Primigravida pregnant women. Int J Nurs and Midwifery. 2015;7(9):141-45. DOI: 10.5897/IJNM2015.0186
- 11. Toptaş B, Aksu H, Özsoy S, et al. Social support status and the affecting factors in pregnant women. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2019:16(3);736-745. DOI:10.14687/jhs.v16i3.5618
- 12. Izadirad H, Niknami S, Zareban I, et al. Effects of social support and self-efficacy on maternal prenatal cares among the first-time pregnant women, Iranshahr, Iran. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 2017:11(2);67–73.
- 13. Hamid SBA and Zaidi NM. Predictors of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy in Malaysian women: a cross-sectional study. Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan. 2020:15(1);53-62. DOI:10.25182/jgp.2020.15.1.53-62
- 14. Khresheh RM and Ahmed NM. Breastfeeding self efficacy among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2018:39(11);1116-1122. DOI:10.15537/smj.2018.11.23437
- 15. Alp Ylmaz F and Uzunçakmak T. Relationship between perceived social support and complaints during pregnancy and their effects on quality of life. Gevher Nesıbe Journal of Medıcal & Health Scıences, 2020:5(9);21-26. DOI: 10.46648/gnj.126
- 16. Harrison V, Moulds ML, Jones K. Perceived social support and prenatal wellbeing; The mediating effects of loneliness and repetitive negative thinking on anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women and Birth. 2022:35(3);232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.014
- 17. Zhang L, Fu B, Xu Y, et al. Association between social support and perceived stress: a cross-sectional study on staffs of the epidemic prevention during the COVID-19 epidemic in china. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022:1-10. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.844139
- 18. Matvienko-Sikar K, Pope J, Cremin A, et al. Differences in levels of stress, social support, health behaviours, and stress-reduction strategies for women pregnant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and based on phases of pandemic restrictions, in Ireland. Women and Birth, 2023:4(5);447-454. DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.010
- 19. Mirghafourvand M, Malakouti J, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, et al. Predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in iranian women: A cross-sectional study. Int J Women's Health Reprod Sci. 2018:6(3);380-85. DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.62
Yıl 2024,
Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 274 - 279, 01.07.2024
Öz
Giriş/Amaç: Çalışma, primipar gebelerde algılanan sosyal desteğin prenatal emzirme öz yeterliliği ile ilişkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve ilişki arayıcı tipte yapılan çalışma, araştırmaya alınma kriterlerini taşıyan 350 gebe ile tamamlanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında; anket formu, Prenatal Emzirme Öz Yeterliliği Ölçeği ve Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışma sonucunda, prenatal emzirme öz yeterliliği ve algılanan sosyal destek arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Gebelere prenatal dönemde sağlanan sosyal destek arttıkça emzirme öz yeterliklerininde arttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
yok
Proje Numarası
yok
Teşekkür
yok
Kaynakça
- 1. Corby K, Kane D, Dayus D. Investigating predictors of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy. CJNR. 2021:53(1);56-63. DOI: 10.1177/0844562119888363
- 2. Erkal Aksoy YE, Bay H, Yilmaz SD. Factors affecting primiparous women’s breastfeeding self-efficacy levels. Clinical Lactation. 2022:13(2);100-111. DOI: 10.1891/CL-2021-0016
- 3. Denoual H, Dargentas M, Roudaut S, et al. Father’s role in supporting breastfeeding of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016:6(6);104-70. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010470
- 4. Gumusdas M and Ejder Apay S. The relationship between the marital adjustment and social support in pregnancy. Journal of Health Scıence and Professıons. 2016:3(1);1-8. DOI: 10.17681/hsp.16572
- 5. Bazzano AN, Kaji A, Felker-Kantor,E, et al. Qualitative studies of infant and young child feeding in lower-income countries: a systematic review and synthesis of dietary patterns. Nutrients. 2017:9(10);1140. DOI: 10.3390/nu9101140
- 6. Wells KJ, Thompson NJ, Kloeblen-Tarver AS. Development and psychometric testing of the prenatal breast-feeding self-efficacy scale. Am J Health Behav. 2006:30(2);177-187. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.30.2.7
- 7. Aydin A and Pasinlioglu T. Reliability and validity of a turkish version of the prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy scale. Midwifery. 2018:64;11-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007
- 8. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1990:55(3-4);610-617. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095
- 9. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Çok Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychology. 2001:12(1);17-25.
- 10. Nazari M, Ghasemi S, Vafaei H, et al. The perceived social support and its relationship with some of the demographic characteristics in Primigravida pregnant women. Int J Nurs and Midwifery. 2015;7(9):141-45. DOI: 10.5897/IJNM2015.0186
- 11. Toptaş B, Aksu H, Özsoy S, et al. Social support status and the affecting factors in pregnant women. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2019:16(3);736-745. DOI:10.14687/jhs.v16i3.5618
- 12. Izadirad H, Niknami S, Zareban I, et al. Effects of social support and self-efficacy on maternal prenatal cares among the first-time pregnant women, Iranshahr, Iran. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 2017:11(2);67–73.
- 13. Hamid SBA and Zaidi NM. Predictors of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy in Malaysian women: a cross-sectional study. Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan. 2020:15(1);53-62. DOI:10.25182/jgp.2020.15.1.53-62
- 14. Khresheh RM and Ahmed NM. Breastfeeding self efficacy among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2018:39(11);1116-1122. DOI:10.15537/smj.2018.11.23437
- 15. Alp Ylmaz F and Uzunçakmak T. Relationship between perceived social support and complaints during pregnancy and their effects on quality of life. Gevher Nesıbe Journal of Medıcal & Health Scıences, 2020:5(9);21-26. DOI: 10.46648/gnj.126
- 16. Harrison V, Moulds ML, Jones K. Perceived social support and prenatal wellbeing; The mediating effects of loneliness and repetitive negative thinking on anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women and Birth. 2022:35(3);232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.014
- 17. Zhang L, Fu B, Xu Y, et al. Association between social support and perceived stress: a cross-sectional study on staffs of the epidemic prevention during the COVID-19 epidemic in china. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022:1-10. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.844139
- 18. Matvienko-Sikar K, Pope J, Cremin A, et al. Differences in levels of stress, social support, health behaviours, and stress-reduction strategies for women pregnant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and based on phases of pandemic restrictions, in Ireland. Women and Birth, 2023:4(5);447-454. DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.010
- 19. Mirghafourvand M, Malakouti J, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, et al. Predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in iranian women: A cross-sectional study. Int J Women's Health Reprod Sci. 2018:6(3);380-85. DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.62
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Hemşirelik |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | yok |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Temmuz 2024 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 5 Mayıs 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 |
