Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS ON PHYSICAL FITNESS: A PILOT STUDY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 9 - 14, 30.08.2020

Öz

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the third-year students' of the physiotherapy and rehabilitation department who took sportsman health and rehabilitation courses, physical fitness test results, and the perspectives on physical fitness tests.
Material and methods: 64 volunteer students participated in the study. The students' views on the concept of physical fitness were examined with the help of questions prepared by the researchers. The physical fitness performances of the students were evaluated using the flamingo balance test, standing long jump test, touch the disc test, sit-reach test, bent arm grip test, shuttle test, and 10x5 shuttle run test.
Results: 43 female (67.2%) and 21 male (32.8%) students participated in the study. The average age of the students was 20.95 ± 0.97 years. There was a statistically significant difference in all tests except for the sit-and-reach test, by gender (p <0.05). Female students performed better in the Flamingo balance test and touch the disc test, while male students were better in other tests. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between body mass index values of female students and bent arm grip test and standing long jump scores (r1: -0.497, r2: -0.463; p<0.01).
Conclusion: The results of our study showed that students did not connect with physical fitness levels and their ability to meet professional practices physically, and their physical fitness test scores were similar to age groups.

Teşekkür

None

Kaynakça

  • 1. https://www.who.int/health-topics/physical-activity#tab=tab_1.
  • 2. D Guseman EH, Whipps J, Howe CA, et al. First-year osteopathic medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward physical activity. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018;118:389-395.
  • 3. NK Multani, Bhawna, Amandeep Singh. Level of Physical Fitness among Physiotherapy Students a Study of Punjab and Haryana. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;21:1136-1140.
  • 4. Ussher MH OC, Cook DG, Whincup PH. The relationship between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2007;42:851-856.
  • 5. Kumar R. The Benefits of Physical Activity and Exercise for Health. Research review International Journal of Multidisciplinary. 2017;2:1-3.
  • 6. JunLi W. The association between physical fitness and physical activity among Chinese college students, Journal of American College Health. 2019;67:602-609.
  • 7. Nelson MC N-SD, Hannan PJ, Sirard JR, Story M. Longitudinal and secular trends in physical activity and sedentary behavior during adolescence. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1627-1634.
  • 8. Ölçücü B, Vatansever Ş, Özcan G ve ark. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi İle Depresyon ve Anksiyete İlişkisi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;4:294-303.
  • 9. Rai R, Chugh P, Negi MPS. A Study on Cardiovascular Fitness of Sedentary College Students. Int J of Sci Res.2015;4:109-112.
  • 11. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–131.
  • 12. Abramson S, Stein J, Schaufele M, et al. Personal exercise habits and counseling practices of primary care physicians: a national survey. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:40-48.
  • 13. Reeves B, Barwick E, Maghrabi P. Physical fitness level of first-year exercise science students. Journal of Exercise and Nutrition. 2018;5:1-5.
  • 14. Stephens MB, Cochran C, Hall JM, et al. Physical fitness during medical school: a 4-year study at the uniformed services university. Fam Med. 2012;44:694-697.
  • 15. Günay AR, Ceylan HI, Çolakoğolu FF, et al. Comparison of Coinciding Anticipation Timing and Reaction Time Performances of Adolescent Female Volleyball Players in Different Playing Positions. The Sport Journal. 2019;36:1–12.
  • 16. Adam C, Klissouras V, Ravassolo M, et al. Handbook for the Eurofit test of physical fitness. Rome: Edigraf Editoriale Gráfica. 1988.
  • 17. Tsigilis N, Douda H, Tokmakidis SP. Test-retest reliability of the Eurofit test battery administered to university students. Percept Motor Skill. 2002;95:1295-300.
  • 18. Lipošek S PJ, Leskošek B, Pajtler A. Physical activity of university students and its relation to physical fitness and academic success. Annales Kinesiologiae. 2018;9:89-104.
  • 19. Arslan T. Müzisyenlerde üst ekstremite fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2017
  • 20. Lorger M, Marijana H, Željko H. The effects of motor learning on results of standing long jump performed by female students. Sport Science. 2012:5; 27-31.
  • 21. Will FW W, Porter JM, Brown LE. Effect of attentional focus strategies on peak force and performance in the standing long jump. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012;26:1226-1231.
  • 22. Adegoke BO, Akpan GA, Mbada CE. Normative values of lower back and hamstring flexibility for Nigerians using the modified sit-and-reach test. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2012;15:1250015.
  • 23. Mier CM, Shapiro BS. Sex differences in pelvic and hip flexibility in men and women matched for sit-and-reach score. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27:1031-1035.
  • 24. Garcia SC. Validity of the sit-and-reach test for male and female adolescents. 1994.
  • 25. Pate RR, Slentz CA, Katz DP. Relationships between skinfold thickness and performance of health related fitness test items. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1989;60:183-189.
  • 26. Kaj M, Tékus É, Juhász I, et al. Changes in physical fitness of Hungarian college students in the last fifteen years. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 2015;66:270-281.
  • 27. Bell NS MT, Hemenway D, Amoroso PJ, et al. High injury rates among female army trainees: a function of gender?. American journal of preventive medicine. 2000;18:141-146.
  • 28. Štefan L PP, Sporiš G. Sex and age correlations of reported and estimated physical fitness in adolescents. PloS One. 2019;14:e0219217.
  • 29. Ryman Augustsson S BE, Magnusson Thomas E, Sahlberg M, et al. Gender differences and reliability of selected physical performance tests in young women and men. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2009;11:64-70.
  • 30. Milanović Z PS, Trajković N, Sporiš G, et al. Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2014, 9: 979-980.
  • 31. Keane A SM, Dugdill L, Reilly T. Fitness test profiles as determined by the Eurofit Test Battery in elite female Gaelic football players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24:1502-1506.
  • 32. Kociuba M KS, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. Sports preference and digit ratio (2D: 4D) among female students in Wrocław, Poland. Journal of biosocial science. 2017;49:623-633. ropologicum. 2017 Mar 7;41(1):31-7.

FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİZİKSEL UYGUNLUĞA İLİŞKİN TEST SONUÇLARI VE BAKIŞ AÇILARI: BİR PİLOT ÇALIŞMA

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 9 - 14, 30.08.2020

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı sporcu sağlığı ve rehabilitasyon dersini alan fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon bölümü üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin fiziksel uygunluk test sonuçlarını ve fiziksel uygunluk testlerine bakış açılarını incelemekti.
Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya 64 gönüllü öğrenci katıldı. Araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan sorular yardımıyla öğrencilerin fiziksel uygunluk kavramına ilişkin görüşleri incelendi. Öğrencilerin fiziksel uygunluk performansları flamingo denge testi, durarak uzun atlama testi, disklere dokunma testi, otur-uzan testi, bükülü kolla tutunma testi, mekik testi ve 10x5 mekik koşu testi kullanılarak değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya 43 kız (%67.2) ve 21 erkek (%32.8) öğrenci katıldı. Öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 20,95±0,97 yıldı. Öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine göre test skorları karşılaştırıldığında otur-uzan testi dışındaki tüm testlerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Flamingo denge testi ve disklere dokunma testinde kız öğrenciler daha iyi performans gösterirken diğer testlerde erkek öğrenciler daha iyiydi. Kız öğrencilerin vücut kütle indeksi değerleri ile bükülü kolla tutunma ve durarak uzun atlama skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı negatif yönlü ilişki saptandı (r1:-0.497, r2: -0.463; p<0.01).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçları öğrencilerin fiziksel uygunluk düzeyleri ile mesleki uygulamaları fiziksel olarak karşılayabilme yeterliliği arasında bağ kurmadıklarını ve fiziksel uygunluk test skorlarının kendi yaş gruplarına benzer olduğunu gösterdi.

Kaynakça

  • 1. https://www.who.int/health-topics/physical-activity#tab=tab_1.
  • 2. D Guseman EH, Whipps J, Howe CA, et al. First-year osteopathic medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward physical activity. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018;118:389-395.
  • 3. NK Multani, Bhawna, Amandeep Singh. Level of Physical Fitness among Physiotherapy Students a Study of Punjab and Haryana. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;21:1136-1140.
  • 4. Ussher MH OC, Cook DG, Whincup PH. The relationship between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2007;42:851-856.
  • 5. Kumar R. The Benefits of Physical Activity and Exercise for Health. Research review International Journal of Multidisciplinary. 2017;2:1-3.
  • 6. JunLi W. The association between physical fitness and physical activity among Chinese college students, Journal of American College Health. 2019;67:602-609.
  • 7. Nelson MC N-SD, Hannan PJ, Sirard JR, Story M. Longitudinal and secular trends in physical activity and sedentary behavior during adolescence. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1627-1634.
  • 8. Ölçücü B, Vatansever Ş, Özcan G ve ark. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi İle Depresyon ve Anksiyete İlişkisi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;4:294-303.
  • 9. Rai R, Chugh P, Negi MPS. A Study on Cardiovascular Fitness of Sedentary College Students. Int J of Sci Res.2015;4:109-112.
  • 11. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–131.
  • 12. Abramson S, Stein J, Schaufele M, et al. Personal exercise habits and counseling practices of primary care physicians: a national survey. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:40-48.
  • 13. Reeves B, Barwick E, Maghrabi P. Physical fitness level of first-year exercise science students. Journal of Exercise and Nutrition. 2018;5:1-5.
  • 14. Stephens MB, Cochran C, Hall JM, et al. Physical fitness during medical school: a 4-year study at the uniformed services university. Fam Med. 2012;44:694-697.
  • 15. Günay AR, Ceylan HI, Çolakoğolu FF, et al. Comparison of Coinciding Anticipation Timing and Reaction Time Performances of Adolescent Female Volleyball Players in Different Playing Positions. The Sport Journal. 2019;36:1–12.
  • 16. Adam C, Klissouras V, Ravassolo M, et al. Handbook for the Eurofit test of physical fitness. Rome: Edigraf Editoriale Gráfica. 1988.
  • 17. Tsigilis N, Douda H, Tokmakidis SP. Test-retest reliability of the Eurofit test battery administered to university students. Percept Motor Skill. 2002;95:1295-300.
  • 18. Lipošek S PJ, Leskošek B, Pajtler A. Physical activity of university students and its relation to physical fitness and academic success. Annales Kinesiologiae. 2018;9:89-104.
  • 19. Arslan T. Müzisyenlerde üst ekstremite fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2017
  • 20. Lorger M, Marijana H, Željko H. The effects of motor learning on results of standing long jump performed by female students. Sport Science. 2012:5; 27-31.
  • 21. Will FW W, Porter JM, Brown LE. Effect of attentional focus strategies on peak force and performance in the standing long jump. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012;26:1226-1231.
  • 22. Adegoke BO, Akpan GA, Mbada CE. Normative values of lower back and hamstring flexibility for Nigerians using the modified sit-and-reach test. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2012;15:1250015.
  • 23. Mier CM, Shapiro BS. Sex differences in pelvic and hip flexibility in men and women matched for sit-and-reach score. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27:1031-1035.
  • 24. Garcia SC. Validity of the sit-and-reach test for male and female adolescents. 1994.
  • 25. Pate RR, Slentz CA, Katz DP. Relationships between skinfold thickness and performance of health related fitness test items. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1989;60:183-189.
  • 26. Kaj M, Tékus É, Juhász I, et al. Changes in physical fitness of Hungarian college students in the last fifteen years. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 2015;66:270-281.
  • 27. Bell NS MT, Hemenway D, Amoroso PJ, et al. High injury rates among female army trainees: a function of gender?. American journal of preventive medicine. 2000;18:141-146.
  • 28. Štefan L PP, Sporiš G. Sex and age correlations of reported and estimated physical fitness in adolescents. PloS One. 2019;14:e0219217.
  • 29. Ryman Augustsson S BE, Magnusson Thomas E, Sahlberg M, et al. Gender differences and reliability of selected physical performance tests in young women and men. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2009;11:64-70.
  • 30. Milanović Z PS, Trajković N, Sporiš G, et al. Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2014, 9: 979-980.
  • 31. Keane A SM, Dugdill L, Reilly T. Fitness test profiles as determined by the Eurofit Test Battery in elite female Gaelic football players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24:1502-1506.
  • 32. Kociuba M KS, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. Sports preference and digit ratio (2D: 4D) among female students in Wrocław, Poland. Journal of biosocial science. 2017;49:623-633. ropologicum. 2017 Mar 7;41(1):31-7.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Özge İpek Dongaz 0000-0001-9984-7460

Dilara Özen Oruk 0000-0001-8180-2328

Asalet Aybüke Güp 0000-0001-6508-010X

Banu Bayar

Kılıçhan Bayar 0000-0002-8090-5859

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Temmuz 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver İpek Dongaz Ö, Özen Oruk D, Güp AA, Bayar B, Bayar K. FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİZİKSEL UYGUNLUĞA İLİŞKİN TEST SONUÇLARI VE BAKIŞ AÇILARI: BİR PİLOT ÇALIŞMA. Karya J Health Sci. 2020;1(1):9-14.