Editorial
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, , 325 - 333, 10.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1434929

Abstract

References

  • 1. Bavaria JE, Szeto WY, Roche LA, et al. The progression of a transcatheter aortic valve program: a decision analysis of more than 680 patient referrals. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2011;92(6):2072-7. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.060
  • 2. Bakaeen FG, Kar B, Chu D, et al. Establishment of a transcatheter aortic valve program and heart valve team at a veterans affairs facility. The American Journal of Surgery. 2012;204(5):643-8. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.017
  • 3. Hawkey MC, Lauck SB, Perpetua EM, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement program development: recommendations for best practice. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;84(6):859-67. DOI:10.1002/ccd.25529
  • 4. Johnson K. The evolution of the program coordinator: from one valve to the whole Heart. Structural Heart. 2019;3(1):18-9. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2018.1554928
  • 5. Lauck S, Achtem L, Boone RH, et al. Implementation of processes of care to support transcatheter aortic valve replacement programs. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2013;12(1):33-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.005
  • 6. Bennetts J, Sinhal A, Walters D, et al. 2021 CSANZ and ANZSCTS position statement on the operator and institutional requirements for a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) program in Australia. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2021;30(12):1811-8. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2021.07.017
  • 7. Bohmann K, Burgdorf C, Zeus T, et al. The COORDINATE pilot study: impact of a transcatheter aortic valve coordinator program on hospital and patient outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(5). DOI:10.3390/jcm11051205
  • 8. De Ronde-Tillmans MJAG, Goudzwaard JA, El Faquir N, et al. TAVI Care and Cure, the Rotterdam multidisciplinary program for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Design and rationale. International Journal of Cardiology. 2020;302:36-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.005
  • 9. Lortz J, Lortz TP, Johannsen L, et al. Clinical process optimization of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Future Cardiology. 2021;17(2):321-7. DOI:10.2217/fca-2020-0010
  • 10. Van Wiechen MP, Ooms JF, Hokken TW, et al. Pathways towards lean TAVR. Structural Heart. 2020;4(4):284-7. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2020.1765056
  • 11. Lauck SB, McCalmont G, Smith A, et al. Setting a benchmark for quality of care: Update on best practices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement programs. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 2022;34(2):215-31. DOI:10.1016/j.cnc.2022.02.009
  • 12. Lauck SB, Smith A. The Heart Team: A gold standard of care. In: Hawkey MC, Lauck SB, editors. Valvular Heart Disease: A guide for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 59-72.
  • 13. Batchelor WB, Anwaruddin S, Wang DD, et al. The multidisciplinary heart team in cardiovascular medicine: Current role and future challenges. JACC: Advances. 2023;2(1):100160. DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100160
  • 14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021;372:n71. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71
  • 15. Lauck S., Sathananthan J., Achtem L., et al. Nurse-led post-procedure protocol to facilitate safe next-day discharge home: Findings of the 3M TAVR study. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;35(10):204.
  • 16. Adhami N, Rozor M, Percy C, et al. The road to a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: patient experiences leading up to the procedure and in the early recovery period. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2023;22(5):463-71. DOI:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac066
  • 17. Lauck SB, Wood DA, Baumbusch J, et al. Vancouver transcatheter aortic valve replacement clinical pathway: Minimalist approach, standardized care, and discharge criteria to reduce length of stay. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2016;9(3):312-21. DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002541
  • 18. Perpetua EM, Russo MJ. Never let a crisis go to waste: What have we learned about clinical pathways for transcatheter structural heart interventions? Structural Heart. 2021;5(6):605-7. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2021.2006384
  • 19. Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, et al. The Vancouver 3M (multidisciplinary, multimodality, but minimalist) clinical pathway facilitates safe next-day discharge home at low-, medium-, and high-volume transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers: The 3M TAVR study. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12(5):459-69. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020
  • 20. Clarke SE. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of acquired heart valve disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:89-121.
  • 21. Tchetche D, de Biase C, Brochado B, et al. How to make the TAVI pathway more efficient. Interventional Cardiology Review. 2019;14(1):31. DOI:10.15420/icr.2018.28.2
  • 22. Perpetua EM, Clarke SE, Guibone KA, et al. Surveying the landscape of structural heart disease coordination: An exploratory study of the coordinator role. Structural Heart-the Journal of the Heart Team. 2019;3(3):201-10. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2019.1581962
  • 23. Neuburger PJ, Luria BJ, Rong LQ, et al. Operational and institutional recommendations and requirements for TAVR: A review of expert consensus and the impact on health care policy. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2019;33(6):1731-41. DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.062
  • 24. Hawkey MC, Lauck SB. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals: Springer; 2022.
  • 25. Frantzen AT, Lauck SB, Norekvål TM. Measuring function, frailty and quality of life in people with heart valve disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:123-33.
  • 26. Lauck S, Forman J, Borregaard B, et al. Facilitating transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era of COVID-19: Recommendations for programmes. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2020;19(6):537-44. DOI:10.1177/1474515120934057
  • 27. Almanfi A. The Key Elements That are Fundamental for Initiating a Structural Heart Program. Structural Heart. 2018;2(3):197-8. DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2018.1446110
  • 28. Speight MK. Transcatheter treatment options for acquired valvular heart disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:167-89.
  • 29. Straiton N, Johnston R, Martin L. 826 examining structural heart disease care management: an exploratory study of the coordinator role. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2020;29:S409. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.833
  • 30. Perpetua EM, Guibone KA, Keegan PA, et al. Best practice recommendations for optimizing care in structural heart programs: planning efficient and resource leveraging systems (PEARLS). Structural Heart. 2021;5(2):168-79. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2021.1877858

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE RESULTS OF THE COORDINATOR APPROACH IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION

Year 2025, , 325 - 333, 10.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1434929

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Communication and coordination between the patient, family, and heart team members remain a managerial challenge, although the heart team approach considers the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) management multidimensional. The managerial difficulties of the TAVI have been overcome by a coordinator, usually a nurse, who is called the TAVI coordinator. This systematic review aims to holistically reveal the results of the coordination approach in TAVI management.
Methods: With the search designed based on study purpose in databases, 445 studies were identified [Science Direct (n=259), Scopus (n=62), Google Scholar (n=43), Medline+TR Index (n=13), PubMed (n=12), Web of Science (n=10), Emerald (n=4), Citations (n=42)]. Twenty-eight (28) studies were synthesized after systematic screening based on study criteria. The systematic review process used a systematic search and review typology. The research process was implemented based on the "PRISMA" checklist.
Results: Results indicated that TAVI or valve structural heart coordination accelerates the pathway, increases patient satisfaction, optimizes resource use, and reduces costs, helping to prevent medical error.
Conclusion: This study reveals the positive results of the coordination approach on the team, patient and hospital. It brings the approach to the agenda of clinic and hospital managers as a managerial tool.

References

  • 1. Bavaria JE, Szeto WY, Roche LA, et al. The progression of a transcatheter aortic valve program: a decision analysis of more than 680 patient referrals. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2011;92(6):2072-7. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.060
  • 2. Bakaeen FG, Kar B, Chu D, et al. Establishment of a transcatheter aortic valve program and heart valve team at a veterans affairs facility. The American Journal of Surgery. 2012;204(5):643-8. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.017
  • 3. Hawkey MC, Lauck SB, Perpetua EM, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement program development: recommendations for best practice. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;84(6):859-67. DOI:10.1002/ccd.25529
  • 4. Johnson K. The evolution of the program coordinator: from one valve to the whole Heart. Structural Heart. 2019;3(1):18-9. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2018.1554928
  • 5. Lauck S, Achtem L, Boone RH, et al. Implementation of processes of care to support transcatheter aortic valve replacement programs. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2013;12(1):33-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.005
  • 6. Bennetts J, Sinhal A, Walters D, et al. 2021 CSANZ and ANZSCTS position statement on the operator and institutional requirements for a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) program in Australia. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2021;30(12):1811-8. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2021.07.017
  • 7. Bohmann K, Burgdorf C, Zeus T, et al. The COORDINATE pilot study: impact of a transcatheter aortic valve coordinator program on hospital and patient outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(5). DOI:10.3390/jcm11051205
  • 8. De Ronde-Tillmans MJAG, Goudzwaard JA, El Faquir N, et al. TAVI Care and Cure, the Rotterdam multidisciplinary program for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Design and rationale. International Journal of Cardiology. 2020;302:36-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.005
  • 9. Lortz J, Lortz TP, Johannsen L, et al. Clinical process optimization of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Future Cardiology. 2021;17(2):321-7. DOI:10.2217/fca-2020-0010
  • 10. Van Wiechen MP, Ooms JF, Hokken TW, et al. Pathways towards lean TAVR. Structural Heart. 2020;4(4):284-7. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2020.1765056
  • 11. Lauck SB, McCalmont G, Smith A, et al. Setting a benchmark for quality of care: Update on best practices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement programs. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 2022;34(2):215-31. DOI:10.1016/j.cnc.2022.02.009
  • 12. Lauck SB, Smith A. The Heart Team: A gold standard of care. In: Hawkey MC, Lauck SB, editors. Valvular Heart Disease: A guide for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 59-72.
  • 13. Batchelor WB, Anwaruddin S, Wang DD, et al. The multidisciplinary heart team in cardiovascular medicine: Current role and future challenges. JACC: Advances. 2023;2(1):100160. DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100160
  • 14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021;372:n71. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71
  • 15. Lauck S., Sathananthan J., Achtem L., et al. Nurse-led post-procedure protocol to facilitate safe next-day discharge home: Findings of the 3M TAVR study. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;35(10):204.
  • 16. Adhami N, Rozor M, Percy C, et al. The road to a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: patient experiences leading up to the procedure and in the early recovery period. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2023;22(5):463-71. DOI:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac066
  • 17. Lauck SB, Wood DA, Baumbusch J, et al. Vancouver transcatheter aortic valve replacement clinical pathway: Minimalist approach, standardized care, and discharge criteria to reduce length of stay. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2016;9(3):312-21. DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002541
  • 18. Perpetua EM, Russo MJ. Never let a crisis go to waste: What have we learned about clinical pathways for transcatheter structural heart interventions? Structural Heart. 2021;5(6):605-7. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2021.2006384
  • 19. Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, et al. The Vancouver 3M (multidisciplinary, multimodality, but minimalist) clinical pathway facilitates safe next-day discharge home at low-, medium-, and high-volume transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers: The 3M TAVR study. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12(5):459-69. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020
  • 20. Clarke SE. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of acquired heart valve disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:89-121.
  • 21. Tchetche D, de Biase C, Brochado B, et al. How to make the TAVI pathway more efficient. Interventional Cardiology Review. 2019;14(1):31. DOI:10.15420/icr.2018.28.2
  • 22. Perpetua EM, Clarke SE, Guibone KA, et al. Surveying the landscape of structural heart disease coordination: An exploratory study of the coordinator role. Structural Heart-the Journal of the Heart Team. 2019;3(3):201-10. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2019.1581962
  • 23. Neuburger PJ, Luria BJ, Rong LQ, et al. Operational and institutional recommendations and requirements for TAVR: A review of expert consensus and the impact on health care policy. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2019;33(6):1731-41. DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.062
  • 24. Hawkey MC, Lauck SB. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals: Springer; 2022.
  • 25. Frantzen AT, Lauck SB, Norekvål TM. Measuring function, frailty and quality of life in people with heart valve disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:123-33.
  • 26. Lauck S, Forman J, Borregaard B, et al. Facilitating transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era of COVID-19: Recommendations for programmes. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2020;19(6):537-44. DOI:10.1177/1474515120934057
  • 27. Almanfi A. The Key Elements That are Fundamental for Initiating a Structural Heart Program. Structural Heart. 2018;2(3):197-8. DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2018.1446110
  • 28. Speight MK. Transcatheter treatment options for acquired valvular heart disease. Valvular Heart Disease: A Guide for Cardiovascular Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. 2022:167-89.
  • 29. Straiton N, Johnston R, Martin L. 826 examining structural heart disease care management: an exploratory study of the coordinator role. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2020;29:S409. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.833
  • 30. Perpetua EM, Guibone KA, Keegan PA, et al. Best practice recommendations for optimizing care in structural heart programs: planning efficient and resource leveraging systems (PEARLS). Structural Heart. 2021;5(2):168-79. DOI:10.1080/24748706.2021.1877858
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Review
Authors

Ugur Ugrak 0000-0002-6043-835X

Yasemin Akbulut 0000-0002-6261-8290

Early Pub Date March 21, 2025
Publication Date April 10, 2025
Submission Date February 10, 2024
Acceptance Date January 13, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025

Cite

EndNote Ugrak U, Akbulut Y (April 1, 2025) A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE RESULTS OF THE COORDINATOR APPROACH IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 2 325–333.