Research Article

The Evaluation of YouTube Videos’ Quality About Pediatric Urological Diseases

Volume: 14 Number: 4 October 1, 2023
EN

The Evaluation of YouTube Videos’ Quality About Pediatric Urological Diseases

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on pediatric urological diseases (PUD). Methods: This study was performed between 1 August - 7 August 2023. Turkish YouTube videos related to 'paediatric urology', 'circumcision', 'undescended testis', 'phimosis', 'hypospadias', 'vesicoureteral reflux', 'nocturnal enuresis' and 'testicular torsion' were evaluated. The videos were divided into professional (doctor, nurse, hospital, etc.) and non-professional (patient, patient relatives, news, etc.) according to the uploading source. Video characteristics (number of views, video length, likes, dislikes and comments) were compared between the groups. Video quality was assessed with DISCERN and Global Quality Score (GQS). Results: A total of 498 videos, 312 professional videos and 186 non-professional videos, were included in the study. The number of views and likes were statistically significantly higher in the professional video group than in the non-professional video group (p=0.001 for both parameters). Mean DISCERN score and GQS score were significantly higher in the professional group than in the non-professional group (p=0.001, and p=0.001; respectively). Conclusion: Professional videos about PUD had significantly higher quality and reliability according to DISCERN score and GQS. Moreover, YouTube videos uploaded by professional health care providers had significantly higher ‘view’ number, and ‘like’ number.

Keywords

References

  1. Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(1):11-v.
  2. Frey E, Bonfiglioli C, Brunner M, Frawley J. Parents' Use of Social Media as a Health Information Source for Their Children: A Scoping Review. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):526-539. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.006
  3. Bai G, Fu K, Fu W, Liu G. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:924748.
  4. Freeman B, Chapman S. Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco control. 2007;16:207-10
  5. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. 2014;8:481-90.
  6. Ergul A. Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Surgical Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas. Cureus. 2021;13:e20044.
  7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–111
  8. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten SV. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–2077

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Urology

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

September 4, 2023

Publication Date

October 1, 2023

Submission Date

August 13, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 25, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 14 Number: 4

EndNote
Cakir H, Çağlar U (October 1, 2023) The Evaluation of YouTube Videos’ Quality About Pediatric Urological Diseases. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 4 523–527.