Research Article

Validity and Reliability of 360 Degree Healthcare Leadership Model

Volume: 15 Number: 3 July 1, 2024
EN

Validity and Reliability of 360 Degree Healthcare Leadership Model

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Leadership assessments in the literature based on only self-reports but this is not enough anymore. It could be evaluated by all stakeholders. The objective of this study was to investigate the goodness of fit of 360 degree healthcare leadership scale developed by National Health System Leadership Academy in Turkish population and carry out reliability and validity of the 360 degree healthcare leadership model. Methods: This is a questionnaire validation study. It was conducted in 10 public hospitals with 750 healthcare professionals. Healthcare managers assessed their own leadership skills (171 participants). Later, healthcare professionals were assessed by peers, managers and direct reports, and a 360-degree assessment was completed. Validity, internal consistency and CFA was conducted in this study via SPSS and SPSS AMOS software. Results: Item-total correlation was above 0.30. The Cronbach’s α values were between 0.72 and 0.86 in sub dimensions. Construct validity scores are as follows: CMIN/DF: 2.32; CFI: 0.89; GFI: 0.77; NFI: 0.83; IFI: 0.90. Conclusion: Turkish version of 360 degree healthcare leadership model which included 9 dimensions was approved its applicability in Turkish healthcare organizations and it could be a valuable measurement tool for effective leadership.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul onayı İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Kurulu'ndan alınmıştır.

References

  1. 1 Mandrou E, Tsounis A and Sarafis P. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS). BMC psychology. 2020;8:1-7.
  2. 2 Leach L, Hastings B, Schwarz G, et al. Distributed leadership in healthcare: leadership dyads and the promise of improved hospital outcomes. Leadership in Health Services. 2021;34:353-74.
  3. 3 Chan S. Burnout, engagement & leadership. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2021;67:1217-20.
  4. 4 Belrhiti Z, Giralt AN and Marchal B. Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Int J Health Policy. 2018;7:1073-84. DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.75
  5. 5 Parker G, Smith T, Shea C, et al. Key Healthcare Leadership Competencies: Perspectives from Current Healthcare Leaders. Healthcare Quarterly (Toronto, Ont.). 2022;25:49-56.
  6. 6 Wikström E and Dellve L. Contemporary leadership in healthcare organizations. J Health Organ Manag. 2009;17:931-41.
  7. 7 Cleary S, Du Toit A, Scott V, et al. Enabling relational leadership in primary healthcare settings: lessons from the DIALHS collaboration. Health Policy Plann. 2018;33:65-74. DOI:10.1093/heapol/czx135
  8. 8 Crain MA, Bush AL, Hayanga H, et al. Healthcare leadership in the COVID-19 pandemic: from innovative preparation to evolutionary transformation. Journal of Healthcare Leadership. 2021;13:199.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Policy and Administration (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 1, 2024

Submission Date

October 24, 2023

Acceptance Date

February 15, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 15 Number: 3

EndNote
Gün İ, Söyük S (July 1, 2024) Validity and Reliability of 360 Degree Healthcare Leadership Model. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 15 3 289–296.