Research Article

Examination of Healthcare Quality Indicators with a Two-Stage Panel Data Analysis: The Case of Cancer Care

Volume: 16 Number: 1 January 1, 2025
EN

Examination of Healthcare Quality Indicators with a Two-Stage Panel Data Analysis: The Case of Cancer Care

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the quality of care for cancer patients using survival rates for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and stomach cancers. Methods: The study population comprised OECD countries. Survival rates from breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and stomach cancers, alcohol use, smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity rates, age, and income were selected as research data. A two-stage panel data analysis was performed. In the first stage, efficiency scores were found to be an indicator of the quality of cancer care through data envelopment analysis. In the second stage, the factors affecting efficiency were determined by panel tobit regression analysis. Results: In the first stage, Australia, Canada, Finland, Iceland, Israel, Israel, Korea, the Slovak Republic and Turkey were found to be efficient in all years. In the second stage, it was found that alcohol consumption, smoking, and inactivity statistically decreased cancer activity (p<0,05). Conclusion: To reduce the negative impact of smoking, alcohol consumption, and inactivity on the quality of cancer care, it is important to integrate smoking cessation programs into cancer treatment plans, to offer counseling and support to help patients reduce or stop drinking, and to encourage and facilitate regular physical activity for cancer patients.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. OECD. Health at a glance 2021: Cancer incidence and mortality. OECD Publications, Paris, 2021.
  2. 2. Hess LM, Pohl G. Perspectives of quality care in cancer treatment: A review of the literature. American Health & Drug Benefits, 2013; 6(6): 321.
  3. 3. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, ... Pate M. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health, 2018; 6(11): e1196-e1252.
  4. 4. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Delivering high-quality cancer care: Charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.
  5. 5. Erdal GŞ, Balcıoğlu SSK, Namlı MN. Distress tolerance in patients with metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer: A single-center experience. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2023; 14(3): 409-414.
  6. 6. Wild C, Patera N. Measuring quality in cancer care: Overview of initiatives in selected countries. European Journal of Cancer Care, 2013; 22(6): 773-781.
  7. 7. Das S, Dey MK, Devireddy R, Gartia MR. Biomarkers in cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Sensors, 2023; 24(1): 37.
  8. 8. Curry, SJ, Byers T, Hewitt M. Lifestyle behaviors contributing to the burden of cancer. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, 2003.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Policy , Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

December 10, 2024

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Submission Date

May 23, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 7, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 16 Number: 1

EndNote
Aras Y (January 1, 2025) Examination of Healthcare Quality Indicators with a Two-Stage Panel Data Analysis: The Case of Cancer Care. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 1 142–152.