Research Article

Focused Attention, Reaction Time, and Reactive Agility in Football Referees: A Cognitive and Physical-Based Comparison

Volume: 16 Number: 4 October 1, 2025

Focused Attention, Reaction Time, and Reactive Agility in Football Referees: A Cognitive and Physical-Based Comparison

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the focused attention, reaction time and reactive agility performances of the referees. Method: 76 male referees (38 referees, 38 assistant referees) participated in the study. In the study, Stroop Focused attention test was used to determine the attention performance of the referees, computerized reaction test was used to determine their response performance, and reactive agility test was used to determine the reactive agility performance. The data were analyzed with SPSS, and after the descriptive statistics, the normal distribution was checked, and the Mann-Whitney U test was applied. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, height, weight, BMI, general scores of the attention test, and response time (p>0.05). However, significant differences were observed in the error and correction scores in Card 1 and Card 3 and the reactive agility time (p<0.05). Conclusion: While the focused attention spans and reaction time of the referees and assistant referees were found to be similar, significant differences were found between the groups in terms of some attention sub-dimensions and reactive agility performance. These results show that specific cognitive and physical skill requirements differ according to job descriptions.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Fadde PJ, Zaichkowsky L. Training perceptual-cognitive skills in sports using technology. J Sport Psychol Action. 2018;9(4):239–48.
  2. 2. Baydemir B, Yurdakul HO, Aksoy S. The effect of different training strategies applied to football referees on Maxvo2 and running performance. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(10):2933–7.
  3. 3. Baydemir B, Yurdakul HÖ. Components of speed, quickness, and agility performance in amateur football players. Mediterr J Sport Sci. 2020;3(1):63–71. doi:10.38021/asbid.733904
  4. 4. Helsen WF, Spitz J, Ziv G. The acquisition of perceptual-cognitive expertise in officiating in association football–state of the art. Asian J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2023;3(1):39–46.
  5. 5. Scarpina F, Tagini S. The Stroop color and word test. Front Psychol. 2017;8:557.
  6. 6. Borysiuk Z, Waskiewicz Z. Information processes, stimulation and perceptual training in fencing. J Hum Kinet. 2008;19:63–82.
  7. 7. Samuel RD, Tenenbaum G, Galily Y. The 21st century sports referee: A review of the evolution of the referee’s role and challenges. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2018;13(4):452–9.
  8. 8. Helsen WF, Bultynck JB. Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(2):179–89.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sport and Exercise Nutrition , Sports Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 1, 2025

Submission Date

August 1, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 16 Number: 4

EndNote
Baydemir B (October 1, 2025) Focused Attention, Reaction Time, and Reactive Agility in Football Referees: A Cognitive and Physical-Based Comparison. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 4 658–664.