Breast Reconstruction with Free DIEP Flap: Analysis of the First 14 Cases at an Oncology Branch Hospital
Abstract
Background/Purpose
The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes and complications of the first 14 DIEP flap reconstructions performed at an oncology hospital.
Methods
Twelve patients (14 reconstructions) who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2023 and 2024 were included. Preoperative CT angiography was used to map perforator vessels. Patient demographics, operative details (ischemia time, perforator count, and operative duration), and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Patients were followed for at least six months.
Results
The mean patient age was 47.17 years. Operative times averaged 5 hours 23 minutes for unilateral and 7 hours 28 minutes for bilateral reconstructions. Two patients experienced venous congestion, successfully managed with superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) anastomosis. Partial flap necrosis occurred in one patient, and fat necrosis was observed in two. Donor site dehiscence occurred in two smokers, one with diabetes mellitus. No total flap loss or vascular re-exploration was required. Four patients underwent corrective surgeries for aesthetic purposes. The complication rates were consistent with the literature.
Conclusion
The DIEP flap is a safe and effective option for breast reconstruction with favorable aesthetic and functional outcomes. While technical expertise is essential, this study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing DIEP flap procedures in oncology centers. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to validate these findings and optimize complication management.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
None
Ethical Statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of SBÜ Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital (Approval No. 2024).
Thanks
None
References
- 1. Chen W, Lv X, Xu X, Gao X, Wang B (2018) Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 25(4):464–469.
- 2. Ochoa O, Garza R 3rd, Pisano S, Chrysopoulo M, Ledoux P, Arishita G, Ketchum N, Michalek JE, Nastala C (2019) Prospec- tive longitudinal patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following diep flap breast reconstruction: relation- ship with body mass index. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(6):1589– 1600.
- 3. Panchal, H., & Matros, E. (2017). Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction), 7S–13S.
- 4. Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, Buchel E, Gordillo GM, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Albornoz C, Klassen AF, Wilkins EG (2017) Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast recon- struction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. J Clin Oncol 35(22):2499–2506.
- 5. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, Nyame TT, Gautam S, Morris DJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT (2010) Patient satisfaction in post- mastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1585–1595.
- 6. Prantl, L., Moellhoff, N., von Fritschen, U., Giunta, R. E., Germann, G., Kehrer, A., Lonic, D., Zeman, F., Broer, P. N., & Heidekrueger, P. I. (2020). Immediate versus secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter outcome study. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 302(6), 1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05779-w
- 7. Healy, C., & Allen, R. J., Sr (2014). The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 30(2), 121–125. https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0033-1357272
- 8. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flap without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 645–8.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 29, 2026
Submission Date
October 30, 2025
Acceptance Date
March 17, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 17 Number: April, May, June 2026