The Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of Hospital Perceived Value Scale

Mahmut Akbolat; Ayhan Durmuş

doi:10.31067/acusaglik.847330

EN TR

The Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of Hospital Perceived Value Scale

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to make validity and reliability analysis and adaptation of Hospital Perceived Value Scale developed by Moliner (1) based on the importance of perceived value concept. For this reason, the study aims to make reference to the studies on the relationship between perceived value and other variables that are the subject of research in health management. Methods: The study was carried out with 595 patients who received services from health institutions. For the validity studies of the scale, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed, and for the reliability studies, internal consistency analyzes were performed. Results: According to the findings of the study, the concept of perceived value in hospital; It was found that it was collected under 6 dimensions and the Turkish version of the scale was valid and reliable. Conclusion: According to the resultof the study, the Turkish version of the scale is compatible with the original scale.

Keywords

References

1. Moliner MA. Hospital Perceived Value. Health Care Management Review 2006; 31(4): 328–336.
2. Yılmaz C. Online Alışverişte Algılanan Değer, Memnuniyet, Güven ve Sadakat Arasındaki İlişki, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sivas: Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2010.
3. Kalender A, Uludağ A. Sağlık Hizmetlerinin Yürütülmesinde Doktor-Hasta İlişkisinin Rolü. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 2004; 37(4): 117-132.
4. Porter ME., Teisberg EO. Redefining Competition in Health Care, Harvard Business Review, 2004: 64-77.
5. Zeithaml VA. Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal Of Marketing 1988; 52: 2-22.
6. Sexton D. Trump University Pazarlama 101: Pazarlamanın En Güçlü Fikirleri Daha Fazla Müşteri Edinmek ve Onları Tutmak İçin Nasıl Kullanılır?, (Çeviren N. Kıvılcım Yavuz), İstanbul: Mediacat Kitapları, 2008.
7. Tengilimoğlu D. Sağlık Hizmetleri Pazarlaması, 4. Baskı, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 2016.
8. Choi KS, Cho WH, Lee S, Lee H, Kım C. The Relationships Among Quality, Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention in Health Care Provider Choice: A South Korean Study. Journal of Business Research 2004; 57(8): 913-921.

9. Varinli İ, Çakır A. Hizmet Kalitesi, Değer, Hasta Tatmini ve Davranışsal Niyetler Arasındaki İlişki – Kayseri’de Poliklinik Hastalarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2004; 17 (2): 33-52.
10. Özeloğulları A. Algılanan Değer ile Müşteri Sadakati Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Hastane Örneği, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara: Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2009.
11. Özer L, Başgöze P, Karahan A. The Association Between Perceived Value and Patient Loyalty in Public University Hospitals in Turkey. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2016: 1-19. Doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.1124723.
12. Sánchez-Fernández R, V Iniesta-Bonillo MA. The Concept of Perceived Value: A Systematic Review of the Research. Marketing Theory 2007; 7(4): 427- 451.
13. Caruana A, Fenech N. The Effect of Perceived Value and Overall Satisfaction On Loyalty: A Study Among Dental Patients. Journal of Medical Marketing 2005; 5(3): 245–255.
14. Ateş A. Tüketici Tarafından Algılanan Değerin Market Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye’de Zincir Marketler (Gıda) Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya: Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2014.
15. Sweeney JC, Soutar GN. Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing 2001; 77(2): 203-220.
16. Sanchez J, Callarisa L, Rodriguez RM, Moliner MA. Perceived Value of the Purchase of a Tourism Product. Tourism Management 2006; 27(3): 394-409.
17. Cengiz E, Kırkbir F. Customer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale in Hospitals. Problems and Perspectives in Management 2007; 5(3): 252-267.
18. Gallarza MG, Saura IG. Value Dimensions, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Loyalty: an Investigation of University Students’ Travel Behaviour. Tourism Management 2006; 27(3): 437-452.
19. Ralston RW. Economy and Race: Interactive Determinants of Property Crime in the United States, 1958-1995: Reflections on the Supply of Property Crime. American Journal Of Economics And Sociology 1999; 58(3): 405-434.
20. Otto JE. The Role of the Affective Experience in the Service Experience Chain. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta, Canada. 1997.
21. Otto JE, Ritchie JRB. The Service Experience in Tourism. Tourism Management 1996; 17(3): 165–174.
22. Chahal H, Kumari N. Consumer Perceived Value and Consumer Loyalty in the Healthcare Sector, Journal of Relationship Marketing 2011; 10(2): 88-112.
23. Chahal H, Kumari N. Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale in Hospitals in the Indian Context. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 2012; 6(2): 167–190.
24. Teke A, Cengiz E, Çetin M, Demir C, Kırkbir F, Fedai T. Analysis of the Multi-Item Dimensionality of Patients’ Perceived Value in Hospital Services. Journal of Medical Systems 2012; 36(3): 1301–1307.
25. Carlos Fandos Roıg J, Sanchez Garcıa J, Angel Molıner Tena M, Llorens Monzonıs J. Customer Perceived Value in Banking Services. International Journal of Bank Marketing 2006; 24(5): 266-283.
26. Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL. Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research 1991; 22(2): 159-170.
27. Moliner MA. Loyalty, Perceived Value and Relationship Quality in Healthcare Services. Journal of Service Management 2009; 20(1): 76–97.
28. Karagöz Y. Spss 21.1 Uygulamalı Biyoistatistik, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2014.
29. Bal H. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri, Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Basımevi, SDÜ Yayın No:20. 2001
30. Güredin E. Denetim, İstanbul: Avcıol Matbaası, Muhasebe Enstitüsü Yayın No:50, 1987.
31. Coşkun R, Altunışık R, Bayraktaroğlu S, Yıldırım E. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri - Spss Uygulamalı, 8. Baskı, Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık, 2015.
32. Meydan CH. Şeşen H, Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Amos Uygulamalar, 2. Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2015.
33. Kalaycı Ş. Spss Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, 6. Baskı, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2014.
34. Karagöz Y. Spss ve Amos Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Yayın Etiği, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2017.
35. Tezcan C. Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara: Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Policy

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mahmut Akbolat
Türkiye

Ayhan Durmuş ^*
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 1, 2021

Submission Date

December 11, 2019

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 12 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.847330

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33MZ89DN

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Akbolat M, Durmuş A (April 1, 2021) The Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of Hospital Perceived Value Scale. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 12 2 326–334.