Research Article

Generic Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Volume: 13 Number: 2 March 15, 2022
EN

Generic Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a generic Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion in chronic dry eye disease. Materails and Methods: Thirty patients with dry eye disease were included in this observational, prospective study. Patients were examined at baseline, at month -1,-3 and 6 of the study. The following were evaluated at each visit: CDVA (corrected distance visual acuity), corneal and conjunctival staining (Oxford) score, TBUT (tear break-up time), Schirmer-2 score, OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) score, patient’s subjective rating scale of ocular discomfort, daily use of concomittant artificial tears, the researcher's assessment of the global treatment response, and IOP (intraocular pressure). In addition, drug-related side effects were evaluated individually in each examination. When initiating dry eye treatment, cyclosporine was combined with topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5%. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining (decrease in mean Oxford score), TBUT, Schirmer-2 values, OSDI score, patient’s subjective rating score for ocular discomfort, and mean physician’s subjective assessment of global response to treatment at all follow-up visits (p<0.001). The mean daily use of artifical drops decreased statistically at all time points (<0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events were ocular burning (6.7%), followed by stinging (3.3%), conjunctival hyperemia (3.3%), foreign body sensation (3.3%), and visual disturbance (3.3%). Conclusion: Generic cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion with loteprednol etabonate 0.5% on initiation treatment has well-tolerability and improves subjective and objective measures of dry eye disease.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15(3): 276-283.
  2. 2. Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15(3): 575-628.
  3. 3. J.M. Barbarino, C.E. Staatz, R. Venkataramanan, T.E. Klein, R.B. Altman. PharmGKB summary: cyclosporine and tacrolimus pathways. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013; 23(10): 563-585.
  4. 4. E. Donnenfeld, S.C. Pflugfelder. Topical ophthalmic cyclosporine: pharmacology and clinical uses. Surv Ophthalmol 2009; 54(3): 321-338.
  5. 5. S. Matsuda, S. Koyasu. Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine. Immunopharmacology 2000; 47(2–3): 119-125.
  6. 6. Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Stern ME, Smith JA, Gipson IK. Analysis of topical cyclosporine treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome: effect on conjunctival lymphocytes. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118(11): 1489-1496.
  7. 7. Brignole F, Pisella PJ, De Saint Jean M, Goldschild M, Goguel A, Baudouin C. Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory markers in KCS: 6-month treatment with topical cyclosporine A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42(1): 90-95.
  8. 8. Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sönmez B, de la Paz MF, Comert E, Charoenrook V, et al. Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management. Cornea 2012; 31(9). 1000-1008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ophthalmology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 15, 2022

Submission Date

May 17, 2021

Acceptance Date

December 10, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 13 Number: 2

EndNote
Coşar CB, Kılavuzoğlu AE, Celebi ARC, Altıparmak UE (March 1, 2022) Generic Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 2 241–246.