Risk Factors Associated with Dysfunction of Permanent Tunneled Cuffed Hemodialysis Catheters; Single Center Experience
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1. Bream PR Jr. Update on insertion and complications of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016; 33(1): 31–38.
- 2. Quarello F, Forneris G, Borca M et al: Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts? J Nephrol. 2006; 19: 265–79.
- 3. Labriola L, Pochet JM. Any use for alternative lock solutions in the prevention of catheter-related blood stream infections? J. Vasc Access. 2017; 18; 34–38.
- 4. Ibeas-Lopez, J. New technology: Heparyn and atimicrobial-coated catheters. J. Vasc Access. 2015; 16; 48–53.
- 5. Lok C, Huber T, Lee T, Shenoy S et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020; 75; 1─64.
- 6. Timsit JF. What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2003; 7(6): 397399.
- 7. Kelber J, Delmez JA, Wındus Dw. Factors affecting delivery of high-efficiency dialysis using temporary vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993; 22: 24 ̶ 29.
- 8. Rathi M, Pinnamaneni VST, Sakhuja V. Non-imaging assisted insertion of un-cuffed, non-tunneled internal jugular venous catheters for hemodialysis: safety and utility in modern day world. Biomed J. 2016; 39(4): 283–88.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Radiology and Organ Imaging
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Isil Yildiz
*
0000-0002-2254-977X
Türkiye
Publication Date
July 1, 2021
Submission Date
February 23, 2021
Acceptance Date
May 16, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 12 Number: 3