Mri Assessment of Fetal Posterior Fossa

Number: 1 March 1, 2014
  • Ümit Aksoy Özcan
  • Uğur Işık
  • Mert Koçak
  • Canan Erzen
EN TR

Mri Assessment of Fetal Posterior Fossa

Abstract

Purpose: Various studies have been published on the use of fetal magnetic resonance imaging MRI in the assessment of posterior fossa PF abnormalities. In this study, MRI results of fetal PF analysis in our center have been evaluated. Methods and Material: The fetal MRG cases that were referred to our department have been retrieved by database search retrospectively. Among 308 fetal MRI cases that were examined at second or third the fetuses with PF anomalies were recruited.Results: Of the 308 fetuses, 47 mean gestational age 25.2 weeks had PF abnormalities. The most common abnormalities were, mega cysterna magna 18 , Arnold-Chiari II malformation 12 , occipital encephalocele 6 , Dandy–Walker malformation 5 , arachnoid cyst 3 and others 3 respectively. Twenty-three fetuses were followed-up, 17 terminated, 7 fetuses were lost to follow-up.Conclusion: The increased use of fetal MRI in the assessment of PF is important in consulting the clinician and the families by demonstrating the associated anomalies and detecting the rarely observed findings

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Guibaud L Anomalies de la fosse cerebrale posterieure. In: Garel C, Del- ezoide AL, Guibaud L (eds) Imagerie du cerveau foetal pathologique. Sauramps Medical, Montepellier, 2002: 99– 118.
  2. 2. Altman NR, Naidich TP, Braffman BH Posterior fossa malformations. AJNR 1992; 13:691–724.
  3. 3. Kollias SS, Ball WS Jr, Prenger EC Cystic malformations of the posterior fossa: differential diagnosis clarified through embryologic analysis. Radiographics.1993:13:1211–1231.
  4. 4. Laurent Guibaud. Practical approach to prenatal posterior fossa abnormalities using MRI.Pediatr Radiol. 2004: 34: 700–711.
  5. 5. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging supplements ultrasonographic imaging of the posterior fossa, pharynx and neck in malformed fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13:327–34.
  6. 6. Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T.The fetal cerebellum. Pitfalls in diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(4):372-80.
  7. 7. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL Jr, Khwaja OS, Robson CD, Estroff JA, Barnewolt C, Levine D, Morash D, Nemes L, Zaccagnini L, du Plessis AJ. How Accurately Does Current Fetal Imaging Identify Posterior Fossa Anomalies? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1637-43.
  8. 8. Gandolfi Colleoni G, Contro E, Carletti A, Ghi T, Campobasso G, Rembouskos G, Volpe G, Pilu G, Volpe P. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;39(6):625-31.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Ümit Aksoy Özcan

Uğur Işık

Mert Koçak

Canan Erzen

Publication Date

March 1, 2014

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Number: 1

EndNote
Özcan ÜA, Işık U, Koçak M, Erzen C (March 1, 2014) Fetal Posterior Fossanın MR Değerlendirmesi. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 1 38–42.