Assessment of The Relationship Between The Results of The Language Assessment Test For Aphasia and The Level of Ambulation and Functional Independence In Individuals With Aphasia: a Retrospective Study
Abstract
Objective: This study was planned to evaluate the relationship between the results of the Language Assessment Test for Aphasia and the level of ambulation and functional independence in aphasic individuals. Patients and Methods: The medical records of individuals who have speech disorders after stroke were reviewed and demographic data and information about the disease were recorded. In determining the level of functional independence of individuals; Functional Independence Measure FIM , determining the level of ambulation; Functional Ambulation Scale FAS and Language Assessment Test for Aphasia ADD were used in the evaluation of aphasia. Results: The mean age of the subjects were 57.4±8.8 years, 11 23.4% female and 36 76.6% male. There was a statistically significant negative and moderate correlation between age and ADD scores p
Keywords
References
- Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:196–202. [CrossRef]
- Wallace GL. Profile of life participation after stroke and aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:432–50. [CrossRef]
- Arsic S, Eminovic F, Konstantinovic L, Pavlovic D, Kljajic D, Despotovic M. Correlation between functional independence and quality of executive functions in stroke patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2015;61:333–8. [CrossRef]
- Gialanella B, Bertolinelli M, Lissi M, Prometti P. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:122–9. [CrossRef]
- Liechty JA, Braun ME. Loss and hope: Strategies for coping with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:84–6. [CrossRef]
- Van SJC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–7. [CrossRef]
- Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984;64:35–40. [CrossRef]
- Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311–9. [CrossRef]
- Toğram B, Maviş İ. Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi’nin Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Standardizasyon Çalışması. Turk J Neurol 2012;18:96– 103. [CrossRef]
- Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H, Singhal AB, Greer DM, Smith WS, et al. The prognosis for aphasia in stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;21:350–7. [CrossRef]
- Kalra L. Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation? Stroke 1994;25:346–51. [CrossRef]
- Nakayama H, Jİrgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–13. [CrossRef]
- Engelter S. T, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1379–84. [CrossRef]
- De RE, Faglioni P, Ferrari P. The influence of sex and age on the incidence and type of aphasia. Cortex 1980;16:627–30. [CrossRef]
- Hier DB, Yoon WB, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA. Gender and aphasia in the stroke data bank. Brain Lang 1994;47:155–67. [CrossRef]
- Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:35–43. [CrossRef]
- Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis C. Post‐stroke aphasia prognosis: A review of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:689–94. [CrossRef]
- Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:11–6. [CrossRef]
- Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Francesco L, Lottarini A, Montenero P, In PT, Nolfe G. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;100:202–8. [CrossRef]
- Carod-Artal FJ, Medeiros MSM, Horan TA, Braga LW. Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2005;19:667–73. [CrossRef]
- Kim G, Min D, Lee EO, Kang EK. Impact of Co-occurring Dysarthria and Aphasia on Functional Recovery in Post-stroke Patients. Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40:1010–7. [CrossRef]
- Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology 1992;6:337–48. [CrossRef]
- Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I. Characteristics. Gait Posture 1996;4:136–48. [CrossRef]
- Sullivan KJ, Brown DA, Klassen T, Mulroy S, Ge T, Azen SP, Winstein CJ; Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet). Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007;87:1580–602. [CrossRef]
- Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:234–9. [CrossRef]
- Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Romana F, et al. Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:400–6. [CrossRef]
- Square-Storer P, Darley FL, Sommers RK. Nonspeech and speech processing skills in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 1988;33:65–85. [CrossRef]
- Murray LL, Holland AL, Beeson PM. Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:792–808. [CrossRef]
- Sjöqvist Nätterlund B. A new life with aphasia: everyday activities and social support. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:117–29. [CrossRef]
- Wu JB, Lyu ZH, Liu XJ, Li HP, Wang Q. Development and Standardization of a New Cognitive Assessment Test Battery for Chinese Aphasic Patients: A Preliminary Study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130:2283–90. [CrossRef]
Afazili Bireylerde Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi Sonuçları ile Ambulasyon Düzeyi ve Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Çalışma
Abstract
Amaç: Bu çalışma; afazili bireylerde Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi sonuçları ile ambulasyon düzeyi ve fonksiyonel bağımsızlık arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla planlandı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: İnme sonrası konuşma bozukluğu şikayeti bulunan bireylerin dosyaları incelenerek demografik veriler ve hastalık ile ilgili bilgiler kaydedildi. Bireylerin fonksiyonel bağımsızlık seviyesinin belirlenmesinde; Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği FIM , ambulasyon düzeyinin belirlenmesinde; Fonksiyonel Ambulasyon Skalası FAS ve afazi değerlendirmesinde Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi ADD kullanıldı. Bulgular: Bireylerin yaş ortalamaları 57.4±8.8 yıl olup, 11’i %23.4 kadın ve 36’sı %76.6 erkekti. ADD puanları ve yaş arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı negatif orta düzeyde korelasyon saptandı p
Keywords
References
- Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:196–202. [CrossRef]
- Wallace GL. Profile of life participation after stroke and aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:432–50. [CrossRef]
- Arsic S, Eminovic F, Konstantinovic L, Pavlovic D, Kljajic D, Despotovic M. Correlation between functional independence and quality of executive functions in stroke patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2015;61:333–8. [CrossRef]
- Gialanella B, Bertolinelli M, Lissi M, Prometti P. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:122–9. [CrossRef]
- Liechty JA, Braun ME. Loss and hope: Strategies for coping with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:84–6. [CrossRef]
- Van SJC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–7. [CrossRef]
- Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984;64:35–40. [CrossRef]
- Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311–9. [CrossRef]
- Toğram B, Maviş İ. Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi’nin Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Standardizasyon Çalışması. Turk J Neurol 2012;18:96– 103. [CrossRef]
- Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H, Singhal AB, Greer DM, Smith WS, et al. The prognosis for aphasia in stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;21:350–7. [CrossRef]
- Kalra L. Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation? Stroke 1994;25:346–51. [CrossRef]
- Nakayama H, Jİrgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–13. [CrossRef]
- Engelter S. T, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1379–84. [CrossRef]
- De RE, Faglioni P, Ferrari P. The influence of sex and age on the incidence and type of aphasia. Cortex 1980;16:627–30. [CrossRef]
- Hier DB, Yoon WB, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA. Gender and aphasia in the stroke data bank. Brain Lang 1994;47:155–67. [CrossRef]
- Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:35–43. [CrossRef]
- Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis C. Post‐stroke aphasia prognosis: A review of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:689–94. [CrossRef]
- Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:11–6. [CrossRef]
- Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Francesco L, Lottarini A, Montenero P, In PT, Nolfe G. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;100:202–8. [CrossRef]
- Carod-Artal FJ, Medeiros MSM, Horan TA, Braga LW. Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2005;19:667–73. [CrossRef]
- Kim G, Min D, Lee EO, Kang EK. Impact of Co-occurring Dysarthria and Aphasia on Functional Recovery in Post-stroke Patients. Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40:1010–7. [CrossRef]
- Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology 1992;6:337–48. [CrossRef]
- Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I. Characteristics. Gait Posture 1996;4:136–48. [CrossRef]
- Sullivan KJ, Brown DA, Klassen T, Mulroy S, Ge T, Azen SP, Winstein CJ; Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet). Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007;87:1580–602. [CrossRef]
- Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:234–9. [CrossRef]
- Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Romana F, et al. Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:400–6. [CrossRef]
- Square-Storer P, Darley FL, Sommers RK. Nonspeech and speech processing skills in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 1988;33:65–85. [CrossRef]
- Murray LL, Holland AL, Beeson PM. Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:792–808. [CrossRef]
- Sjöqvist Nätterlund B. A new life with aphasia: everyday activities and social support. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:117–29. [CrossRef]
- Wu JB, Lyu ZH, Liu XJ, Li HP, Wang Q. Development and Standardization of a New Cognitive Assessment Test Battery for Chinese Aphasic Patients: A Preliminary Study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130:2283–90. [CrossRef]
There are 30 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 1, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019Issue: 4 |