Research Article
Year 2023,
Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 197 - 207, 17.03.2023
Abstract
References
- 1 Fareed M and Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Annals of human biology. 2017;44:99-107.
- 2 Bİnbay T, Arik Bİnbay D, Ulaş H, et al. Şizofrenide anne-baba akraba evliliğinin klinik özelliklere etkisi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2017;18.
- 3 Durduran Y, Bodur S, Çakıl E, et al. Konya il merkezinde sağlıkta dönüşüm öncesi ve sonrası gebe ve bebek izlemleri. Dicle Medical Journal/Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2012;39.
- 4 Nar MŞ. Tıbbi Antropoloji: Akraba Evliliklerinin Patolojik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;52:223-41.
- 5 Şahİn İA and Selma Ş. AKRABA EVLİLİĞİ TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ: BİR METODOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences. 2020;6:168-91.
- 6 Chen X, Hay JL, Waters EA, et al. Health literacy and use and trust in health information. Journal of health communication. 2018;23:724-34.
- 7 Kutlu G and Akbulut Y. Türkiye’de sağlık okuryazarlığı politikalarının hastaneler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2019;11:132-43.
- 8 Bakanlığı TS and Müdürlüğü TSHG. Sağlığın teşviki ve geliştirilmesi sözlüğü. Bakanlık yayın. 2011;814.
- 9 Yilmazel G. 8c Çetinkaya, F.(2016). Sağlık okuryazarlığının toplum sağlığı açısından önemi [The importance of health literacy for community health]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin.15:69-74.
- 10 Squiers L, Peinado S, Berkman N, et al. The health literacy skills framework. Journal of health communication. 2012;17:30-54.
- 11 Bobov G and Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language. Journal of religion and health. 2020;59:1080-95.
- 12 Ersin F, Capik C, Kissal A, et al. Breast cancer fatalism scale: A validity and reliability study in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2018;11:783.
- 13 Dayapoglu N, Ayyıldız Nİ and Şeker D. Determination of health fatalism and the factors affecting health fatalism in patients with epilepsy in the North of Turkey. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2021;115:107641.
- 14 Alp Şahin İ. Akraba evliliği tutum ölçeği: Metodolojik bir çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
- 15 Temel AB and Zühal A. Evaluation of validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Health Literacy Scale. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2017;25:85-94.
- 16 Kaya A and Bozkur B. Kadercilik Eğilimi Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015;11.
- 17 Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn Boston. Ma: Pearson. 2013.
- 18 Jaber L, Romano O, Halpern GJ, et al. Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: survey among Israeli Arab adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.
- 19 Sandridge AL, Takeddin J, Al-Kaabi E, et al. Consanguinity in Qatar: knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of biosocial science. 2010;42:59-82.
- 20 Sedehi M, Keshtkar A and Golalipour MJ. The knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the North of Iran. Journal of clinical and diagnostic Research. 2012;6:1233-6.
- 21 Middle I, Al-Salloum A, Al-Herbish A, et al. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1881-4.
- 22 Al Salloum A, El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish A, et al. Prevalence of selected congenital anomalies in Saudi children: a community-based study. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2015;35:107-10.
- 23 Anwar S, Taslem Mourosi J, Arafat Y, et al. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2020;15:e0241610.
- 24 Hussain R and Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1998;30:261-75.
- 25 Hussain R. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1999;31:449-61.
- 26 Şen ŞR. Aydın il merkezinde akraba evliliği sıklığı ve gebelik sonuçları ile ilişkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2010.
- 27 Samli H, Toprak D and Solak M. Afyonkarahisar ilinde Akraba Evlilikleri ve I Bunun Dogumsal Anomaliler ile Iliskisi. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2006;7.
- 28 Al-Gazali L, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq Y, et al. consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of biosocial science. 1997;29:491-7.
- 29 Alharbi OA, Al-Shaia WA, Al-Hamam AA, et al. Attitude of Saudi Arabian adults towards consanguineous marriage. Qatar Medical Journal. 2015;2015:12.
- 30 Teeuw ME, Loukili G, Bartels EA, et al. Consanguineous marriage and reproductive risk: attitudes and understanding of ethnic groups practising consanguinity in Western society. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;22:452-7.
- 31 Bener A and Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18:315–20-–20.
- 32 Cho YI, Lee S-YD, Arozullah AM, et al. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Social science & medicine. 2008;66:1809-16.
- 33 Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, De Vries E, et al. Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;167:14-21.
- 34 Morris NS, Maclean CD and Littenberg B. Change in health literacy over 2 years in older adults with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2013;39:638-46.
- 35 Biçer EB and Malatyali İ. Sağlık okuryazarlık düzeyinin belirlenmesi: Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi örneği. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2018;17:1-15.
- 36 Temel AB and Çİmen Z. KRONİK HASTALIĞI OLAN YAŞLI BİREYLERDE SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIĞI, SAĞLIK ALGISI VE İLİŞKİLİ FAKTÖRLER. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;33:105-25.
- 37 Acar GA, Baltaci K, Acimiş NM, et al. Bir Tekstil Fabrikasında Çalışanlarda Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Etmenler. 3. International 21. National Public Health Congress; 2019.
- 38 Selvi A. Yakınında meme kanseri olan kadınların öğrenim gereksinimleri ile kadercilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa; 2019.
- 39 Serİn M, Taştan A and Ayten A. Trafikte Sürücü Davranışı ve Dindarlık İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği. Erciyes Akademi.36:186-212.
- 40 Orhan K. Validity and Reliability Study of Fatality Tendency Scale. Uluslararası Medeniyet Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2017;2:83-102.
- 41 Charkazi A, Samimi A, Razzaghi K, et al. Adherence to recommended breast cancer screening in Iranian Turkmen women: the role of knowledge and beliefs. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013;2013.
- 42 Denewer A, Farouk O, Mostafa WA, et al. Social support and hope among Egyptian women with breast cancer after mastectomy. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2011;5:BCBCR. S6655.
- 43 Hwang JJ, Donnelly TT, Ewashen C, et al. Sociocultural influences on Arab women’s participation in breast cancer screening in Qatar. Qualitative health research. 2017;27:714-26.
- 44 Powe BD, Hamilton J and Brooks P. Perceptions of cancer fatalism and cancer knowledge: a comparison of older and younger African American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2006;24:1-13.
- 45 Kiraç R and Öztürk YE. HALKIN SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYİ İLE SAĞLIK KAYGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;23:214-43.
Consanguineous Marriage, Health Literacy and Fatalism Levels of Different Generations: A Descriptive-Correlational Study in A Sample from Turkey
Abstract
Objective: This research was conducted to determine consanguineous marriage, health literacy, and fatalism levels of different generations and examine their relationship.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted with 463 individuals living in XXX between September 2021-March 2022.
Results: Significant differences were found between the individuals' Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale, Health Literacy Scale, and Fatalism Tendency Scale total score means and their generation (p<0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between the total score mean of the Individual's Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale and the total and all sub-dimensions of the Health Literacy Scale (p<0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between the total score mean of the Consanguineous Marriage Attitude Scale and the total score mean of the Fatalism Tendency Scale and age (p<0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between the Health Literacy Scale Total Score Mean and age (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In our study, it was found that the attitude of the baby boom generation towards consanguineous marriage was higher, the health literacy level of the Z generation was higher, and the fatalism tendency of the X generation was found to be higher.
References
- 1 Fareed M and Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Annals of human biology. 2017;44:99-107.
- 2 Bİnbay T, Arik Bİnbay D, Ulaş H, et al. Şizofrenide anne-baba akraba evliliğinin klinik özelliklere etkisi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2017;18.
- 3 Durduran Y, Bodur S, Çakıl E, et al. Konya il merkezinde sağlıkta dönüşüm öncesi ve sonrası gebe ve bebek izlemleri. Dicle Medical Journal/Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2012;39.
- 4 Nar MŞ. Tıbbi Antropoloji: Akraba Evliliklerinin Patolojik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;52:223-41.
- 5 Şahİn İA and Selma Ş. AKRABA EVLİLİĞİ TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ: BİR METODOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences. 2020;6:168-91.
- 6 Chen X, Hay JL, Waters EA, et al. Health literacy and use and trust in health information. Journal of health communication. 2018;23:724-34.
- 7 Kutlu G and Akbulut Y. Türkiye’de sağlık okuryazarlığı politikalarının hastaneler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2019;11:132-43.
- 8 Bakanlığı TS and Müdürlüğü TSHG. Sağlığın teşviki ve geliştirilmesi sözlüğü. Bakanlık yayın. 2011;814.
- 9 Yilmazel G. 8c Çetinkaya, F.(2016). Sağlık okuryazarlığının toplum sağlığı açısından önemi [The importance of health literacy for community health]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin.15:69-74.
- 10 Squiers L, Peinado S, Berkman N, et al. The health literacy skills framework. Journal of health communication. 2012;17:30-54.
- 11 Bobov G and Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language. Journal of religion and health. 2020;59:1080-95.
- 12 Ersin F, Capik C, Kissal A, et al. Breast cancer fatalism scale: A validity and reliability study in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2018;11:783.
- 13 Dayapoglu N, Ayyıldız Nİ and Şeker D. Determination of health fatalism and the factors affecting health fatalism in patients with epilepsy in the North of Turkey. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2021;115:107641.
- 14 Alp Şahin İ. Akraba evliliği tutum ölçeği: Metodolojik bir çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
- 15 Temel AB and Zühal A. Evaluation of validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Health Literacy Scale. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2017;25:85-94.
- 16 Kaya A and Bozkur B. Kadercilik Eğilimi Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015;11.
- 17 Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn Boston. Ma: Pearson. 2013.
- 18 Jaber L, Romano O, Halpern GJ, et al. Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: survey among Israeli Arab adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.
- 19 Sandridge AL, Takeddin J, Al-Kaabi E, et al. Consanguinity in Qatar: knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of biosocial science. 2010;42:59-82.
- 20 Sedehi M, Keshtkar A and Golalipour MJ. The knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the North of Iran. Journal of clinical and diagnostic Research. 2012;6:1233-6.
- 21 Middle I, Al-Salloum A, Al-Herbish A, et al. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1881-4.
- 22 Al Salloum A, El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish A, et al. Prevalence of selected congenital anomalies in Saudi children: a community-based study. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2015;35:107-10.
- 23 Anwar S, Taslem Mourosi J, Arafat Y, et al. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2020;15:e0241610.
- 24 Hussain R and Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1998;30:261-75.
- 25 Hussain R. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 1999;31:449-61.
- 26 Şen ŞR. Aydın il merkezinde akraba evliliği sıklığı ve gebelik sonuçları ile ilişkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2010.
- 27 Samli H, Toprak D and Solak M. Afyonkarahisar ilinde Akraba Evlilikleri ve I Bunun Dogumsal Anomaliler ile Iliskisi. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2006;7.
- 28 Al-Gazali L, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq Y, et al. consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of biosocial science. 1997;29:491-7.
- 29 Alharbi OA, Al-Shaia WA, Al-Hamam AA, et al. Attitude of Saudi Arabian adults towards consanguineous marriage. Qatar Medical Journal. 2015;2015:12.
- 30 Teeuw ME, Loukili G, Bartels EA, et al. Consanguineous marriage and reproductive risk: attitudes and understanding of ethnic groups practising consanguinity in Western society. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;22:452-7.
- 31 Bener A and Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18:315–20-–20.
- 32 Cho YI, Lee S-YD, Arozullah AM, et al. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Social science & medicine. 2008;66:1809-16.
- 33 Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, De Vries E, et al. Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;167:14-21.
- 34 Morris NS, Maclean CD and Littenberg B. Change in health literacy over 2 years in older adults with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2013;39:638-46.
- 35 Biçer EB and Malatyali İ. Sağlık okuryazarlık düzeyinin belirlenmesi: Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi örneği. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2018;17:1-15.
- 36 Temel AB and Çİmen Z. KRONİK HASTALIĞI OLAN YAŞLI BİREYLERDE SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIĞI, SAĞLIK ALGISI VE İLİŞKİLİ FAKTÖRLER. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;33:105-25.
- 37 Acar GA, Baltaci K, Acimiş NM, et al. Bir Tekstil Fabrikasında Çalışanlarda Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Etmenler. 3. International 21. National Public Health Congress; 2019.
- 38 Selvi A. Yakınında meme kanseri olan kadınların öğrenim gereksinimleri ile kadercilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa; 2019.
- 39 Serİn M, Taştan A and Ayten A. Trafikte Sürücü Davranışı ve Dindarlık İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği. Erciyes Akademi.36:186-212.
- 40 Orhan K. Validity and Reliability Study of Fatality Tendency Scale. Uluslararası Medeniyet Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2017;2:83-102.
- 41 Charkazi A, Samimi A, Razzaghi K, et al. Adherence to recommended breast cancer screening in Iranian Turkmen women: the role of knowledge and beliefs. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013;2013.
- 42 Denewer A, Farouk O, Mostafa WA, et al. Social support and hope among Egyptian women with breast cancer after mastectomy. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2011;5:BCBCR. S6655.
- 43 Hwang JJ, Donnelly TT, Ewashen C, et al. Sociocultural influences on Arab women’s participation in breast cancer screening in Qatar. Qualitative health research. 2017;27:714-26.
- 44 Powe BD, Hamilton J and Brooks P. Perceptions of cancer fatalism and cancer knowledge: a comparison of older and younger African American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2006;24:1-13.
- 45 Kiraç R and Öztürk YE. HALKIN SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYİ İLE SAĞLIK KAYGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;23:214-43.
There are 45 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Public Health, Environmental Health, Nursing |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 17, 2023 |
| Submission Date | September 19, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023Volume: 14 Issue: 2 |
