A new communication model between clients/patients and dietitians: Telenutrition, evaluation of the perspectives of clients/patients and dietitians

Hürmet Küçükkatırcı Baykan; Neslihan Öner

doi:10.31067/acusaglik.1586516

Research Article

Year 2025, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 310 - 317, 10.04.2025

Hürmet Küçükkatırcı Baykan , Neslihan Öner

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1586516

Abstract

References

1) Data Reportal Digital 2024: July Global Statshot Repor https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-july-global-statshot; 2025 Accessed 16 January 2025.
2) Shah ND, Krupinski EA, Bernard J, et al. The evolution and utilization of telehealth in ambulatory nutrition practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(4):739-749. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10641.
3) Allman-Farinelli M. Digital dietetics and the era of artificial intelligence. Nutr Diet. 2023;80(4):334-337. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12841.
4) Ersoy S, Yıldırım Y, Aykar FŞ, ve ark. Hemşirelikte inovatif alan: Evde bakımda telehemşirelik ve telesağlık. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;6(4):194–201.
5) Santana FB, Oliveira NS, Costa MGO, et al. Impact of telenutrition protocols in a web-based nutrition counseling program on adult dietary practices: Randomized controlled pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2024;118:108005. doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108005
6) Peregrin T. Telehealth is transforming health care: what you need to know to practice telenutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.07.020.
7) Gnagnarella P, Ferro Y, Monge T, et al. Telenutrition: changes in professional practice and in the nutritional assessments of Italian dietitian nutritionists in the COVID-19 Era. Nutrients. 2022;14(7):1359. doi: 10.3390/nu14071359.
8) Güney Coşkun M, Kolay E and Basaranoglu M. Telenutrition for the management of inflammatory bowel disease: Benefits, limits, and future perspectives. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(2):308-15. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.308.
9) Gupta A, Singh N, Madan D, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone application for telenutrition in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(10):2482. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102482.
10) Bookari K, Arrish J, Alkhalaf MM, et al. Perspectives and practices of dietitians with regards to social/mass media use during the transitions from face-to-face to telenutrition in the time of COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey in 10 Arab countries. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1151648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151648.
11) Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
12) Brunton C, Arensberg MB, Drawert S, et al. Perspectives of registered dietitian nutritionists on adoption of telehealth for nutrition care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):235. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020235.
13) Cichon M. Reporting statistical methods and outcome of statistical analyses in research analyses in research articles. Pharmacol Rep. 2020;72:481-85. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00110-5.
14) O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
15) Pierce RP, Stevermer JJ. Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20963893.
16) Turkish Statistical Institute; 2023 https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2022-45587 Accessed 01 September 2023.
17) Gibson PR. Letter: dietitians are more than coaches. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023;57(8):926-27. doi: 10.1111/apt.17446.
18) Önal H. Approach to inherited metabolic diseases. Klinik Tıp Aile Hekimliği. 2018;10(4).
19) Muslu M. Tıbbi beslenme tedavisinde güncel bir yaklaşım: Telenütrisyon. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;11(3):523-31. doi:10.53424/balikesirsbd.957223.
20) Rovelli V, Zuvadelli J, Ercoli V, et al. PKU and COVID19: How the pandemic changed metabolic control. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2021;27:100759. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2021.100759.
21) Zubarioglu T, Hopurcuoglu D, Uygur E, et al. The impact of telemedicine for monitoring and treatment of phenylketonuria patients on metabolic outcome during coronavirus disease-19 outbreak. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(2):258-65. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0569.
22) Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, et al. Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e17298. doi: 10.2196/17298.
23) Bernal-Orozco MF, Posada-Falomir M, Quiñónez-Gastélum CM, et al. Anthropometric and body composition profile of young professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2020;34(7):1911-23. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003416.
24) Chan KS, Wan EY, Chin WY, et al. Effects of continuity of care on health outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01493-x.
25) Jeffers H, Baker M. Continuity of care: still important in modern-day general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(649):396-397. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686185.
26) Salisbury C, Sampson F, Ridd M, et al. How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(561):e134-41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420257.
27) Official Journal; 2023 https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/02/20220210-2.htm Accessed 03 September 2023.

A new communication model between clients/patients and dietitians: Telenutrition, evaluation of the perspectives of clients/patients and dietitians

Year 2025, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 310 - 317, 10.04.2025

Hürmet Küçükkatırcı Baykan , Neslihan Öner

https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1586516

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the status, advantages, and disadvantages of telenutrition from the perspectives of clients/patients and dietitians.
Methods: A total of 100 clients/patients and 100 dietitians were recruited to this cross-sectional study. To assess the status as well as the advantages and disadvantages of telenutrition, a set of inquiries, based on the literature review, were posed to both clients/patients and dietitians.
Results: Both dietitians (%92) and clients/patients (%61) were found to use telenutrition mainly for weight loss diets. It was found that clients/patients who had time constraints due to their busy lifestyle (63%) and whose dietitian was in another city (36%) preferred telenutrition more frequently. Clients/patients (51%) were more concerned than dietitians (32%) that anthropometric measurements were not taken by the expert (p<0.05). 44% of clients/ patients stated that they frequently change their appointments due to the time-flexible system.
Conclusion: Telenutrition has become a necessity today due to the time constraints that many people complain about due to their busy lifestyles, difficulties in traveling to and from hospital/clinic, especially in the elderly age group, pandemics, or natural disasters. In this direction, the steps to be taken to improve telenutrition will increase the quality of telemedicine services. When making relevant improvements, the opinions of the clients/patients group receiving this service and the dietitians providing this service should be consulted and the participation of clients/patients in the formation of health policies should be supported.

Keywords

Client, Dietitian, Patient, Telehealth, Telenutrition

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval from the Cappadocia University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (28.08.2023/23.14)) was obtained for the study.

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Thanks

We would like to thank all clients/patients and dietitians who participated in our study.

References

1) Data Reportal Digital 2024: July Global Statshot Repor https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-july-global-statshot; 2025 Accessed 16 January 2025.
2) Shah ND, Krupinski EA, Bernard J, et al. The evolution and utilization of telehealth in ambulatory nutrition practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(4):739-749. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10641.
3) Allman-Farinelli M. Digital dietetics and the era of artificial intelligence. Nutr Diet. 2023;80(4):334-337. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12841.
4) Ersoy S, Yıldırım Y, Aykar FŞ, ve ark. Hemşirelikte inovatif alan: Evde bakımda telehemşirelik ve telesağlık. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;6(4):194–201.
5) Santana FB, Oliveira NS, Costa MGO, et al. Impact of telenutrition protocols in a web-based nutrition counseling program on adult dietary practices: Randomized controlled pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2024;118:108005. doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108005
6) Peregrin T. Telehealth is transforming health care: what you need to know to practice telenutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.07.020.
7) Gnagnarella P, Ferro Y, Monge T, et al. Telenutrition: changes in professional practice and in the nutritional assessments of Italian dietitian nutritionists in the COVID-19 Era. Nutrients. 2022;14(7):1359. doi: 10.3390/nu14071359.
8) Güney Coşkun M, Kolay E and Basaranoglu M. Telenutrition for the management of inflammatory bowel disease: Benefits, limits, and future perspectives. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(2):308-15. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.308.
9) Gupta A, Singh N, Madan D, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone application for telenutrition in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(10):2482. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102482.
10) Bookari K, Arrish J, Alkhalaf MM, et al. Perspectives and practices of dietitians with regards to social/mass media use during the transitions from face-to-face to telenutrition in the time of COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey in 10 Arab countries. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1151648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151648.
11) Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
12) Brunton C, Arensberg MB, Drawert S, et al. Perspectives of registered dietitian nutritionists on adoption of telehealth for nutrition care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):235. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020235.
13) Cichon M. Reporting statistical methods and outcome of statistical analyses in research analyses in research articles. Pharmacol Rep. 2020;72:481-85. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00110-5.
14) O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
15) Pierce RP, Stevermer JJ. Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20963893.
16) Turkish Statistical Institute; 2023 https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2022-45587 Accessed 01 September 2023.
17) Gibson PR. Letter: dietitians are more than coaches. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023;57(8):926-27. doi: 10.1111/apt.17446.
18) Önal H. Approach to inherited metabolic diseases. Klinik Tıp Aile Hekimliği. 2018;10(4).
19) Muslu M. Tıbbi beslenme tedavisinde güncel bir yaklaşım: Telenütrisyon. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;11(3):523-31. doi:10.53424/balikesirsbd.957223.
20) Rovelli V, Zuvadelli J, Ercoli V, et al. PKU and COVID19: How the pandemic changed metabolic control. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2021;27:100759. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2021.100759.
21) Zubarioglu T, Hopurcuoglu D, Uygur E, et al. The impact of telemedicine for monitoring and treatment of phenylketonuria patients on metabolic outcome during coronavirus disease-19 outbreak. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(2):258-65. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0569.
22) Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, et al. Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e17298. doi: 10.2196/17298.
23) Bernal-Orozco MF, Posada-Falomir M, Quiñónez-Gastélum CM, et al. Anthropometric and body composition profile of young professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2020;34(7):1911-23. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003416.
24) Chan KS, Wan EY, Chin WY, et al. Effects of continuity of care on health outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01493-x.
25) Jeffers H, Baker M. Continuity of care: still important in modern-day general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(649):396-397. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686185.
26) Salisbury C, Sampson F, Ridd M, et al. How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(561):e134-41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420257.
27) Official Journal; 2023 https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/02/20220210-2.htm Accessed 03 September 2023.

There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Subjects	Health Services and Systems (Other)
Journal Section	Research Articles
Authors	Hürmet Küçükkatırcı Baykan 0000-0002-1702-2586 Neslihan Öner 0000-0001-6773-4963
Early Pub Date	March 21, 2025
Publication Date	April 10, 2025
Submission Date	November 16, 2024
Acceptance Date	January 18, 2025
Published in Issue	Year 2025Volume: 16 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote	Küçükkatırcı Baykan H, Öner N (April 1, 2025) A new communication model between clients/patients and dietitians: Telenutrition, evaluation of the perspectives of clients/patients and dietitians. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 2 310–317.

Download Cover Image

Article Files

Full Text