Yenidoğan Stres Ölçeği’nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Sibel Serap Ceylan; Bahire Bolışık

EN TR

EXAMINING PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF NEWBORN STRESS SCALE

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this research is to develop a practical assessment tool that researchers and clinicians can use to evaluate the stress of a newborn. Study Design: This is a methodological study. 212 newborns, treated and cared for at the neonatal intensive care unit, were included in the study. Data was collected from newborn information forms, the Newborn stress scale and the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale COMFORTneo . The scale was assessed in terms of content validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency and the inter-reliability among the observers. Results: Content validity index of scale is between 0.90 and 1.00. The Newborn Stress Scale, which has a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.65-0.81, is highly reliable. Results from the item analysis indicated that item-total correlations r=0.20-0.66 were satisfactorily high. The concurrent validity found there was a positive strong correlation between the scores of the Newborn stress scale and COMFORTneo r=0.58-0.84; p

Keywords

newborn,NICU,nurse

References

Yıldız S. Yenidogan yogun bakım ünitelerinin organizasyonu. in: Temel Neonatoloji ve Hemşirelik İlkeleri. Türkan Dağoğlu ve Gülay Görak Eds. 2. Baskı, İstanbul, Nobel Matbaacılık. 2008, pp.17-29.
Karabudak SS, Ergün S. Yenidoğan hastalıkları ve hemşirelik Bakımı. in: Pediatri Hemşireliği. Zeynep Conk, Zümrüt Başbakkal, Hatice Bal Yılmaz, Bahire Bolışık Eds. Ankara, Akademisyen Tıp Kitabevi. 2013, pp.289-352.
Bradley C, Ritter R. Developmental care fort he sick and preterm infant. in Compherensive Neonatal Nursing Care. Carole Kenner and Judy Wright Lott Eds. 5.th ed, Newyork, Springer. 2014, pp.925-31.
Gardner SL, Goldson E, Hernandez JA. The Neonate and the environment impact on development. in: Merenstein&Gardner’s Handbook of Neonatal İntensive Care. Sandra L. Gardner, Brian S. Carter, Mary Enzman Hines, Jacinto A. Hernandez Eds. 8th edition. St Louis, Elsevier. 2016, p.262-314.
Altimier L, White RD. The neonatal intensive care (NICU) environment. in Compherensive Neonatal Nursing Care. Carole Kenner and Judy Wright Lott Eds. 5.th ed, Newyork, Springer. 2014, pp.722-38.
Vandenberg KA. Individualized Developmental Care for High Risk Newborns in the NICU: A practice guideline. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:433-42
Sarı HY, Çiğdem Z. Gestasyon Haftalarına Göre Bebeğin Gelişimsel Bakımının Planlanması, DEUHYO ED 2013;6:40-8.
Als H. Toward a Synactive Theory of Development: Promise for The Assessment and Support of İnfant İndividuality. Infant Mental Health Journal 1982;3:229-43.

Als H. A Synactive Model of Neonatal Behavioral Organization: Framework for The Assessment of Neurobehavioral Development in The Premature İnfant and for Support of İnfants and Parents in The Neonatal İntensive Care Environment. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1986;3:3-53.
Çiğdem Z. Sinaktif teori ve yenidoğanın değerlendirilmesi. Yenidoğan Yoğun Bakım Üniteleri Gelişimsel Bakım Kursu Notları. in: 3. Ulusal Pediatri Hemşireliği Kongresi Program ve Özet Kitabı; 6-9 Eylül 2011; İzmir, Türkiye; 2011.p.3-6.
Carrier CT. Developmental support. in: Core Curriculum for Neonatal İntensive Care Nursing, AWHONN. M. Terese Verklan and Marlene Walden Eds. 4.th ed, Missouri, Saunders Elsevier. 2010, pp.208-32.
Carpenito-Moyet LJ. Hemşirelik tanıları el kitabı. Çeviren: Firdevs Erdemir. 13. Baskı. İstanbul:Nobel tıp kitap evleri, 2012:94-101.
Coughlin ME. Prevention and management of pain and stress. in: Transformative Nursing in the NICU Trauma-Informed Age- Appropriate Care. Newyork, Springer. 2014, pp.104-14.
Hannah LA. Awareness of preterm infants’ behavioural cues: a survey of neonatal nurses in three Scottish neonatal units. Infant 2010;6:78-82.
Modrin-McCarthy MA, McCue S, Walker J. Preterm İnfants and Stress: A tool for the neonatal nurse. J Perinat Neonat Nurs, 1997;10:62-71.
Hawthorne J. Using the Neonatal Behavioural Assesment Scale to support parent-infant relationships. İnfant 2005;1:213-18.
Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB. Behavioral Differences Between Preterm and Full-term Newborns as Measured with the APIB System Scores: I. Infant Behav Dev. 1988;11:305-18.
Als H, Duffy F, McAnulty G. The APIB: An Assessment of Functional Competence in Preterm and Fullterm Newborns Regardless of Gestational Age at Birth: II. Infant Behav Dev. 1988;11:319–31.
Gill NE, Behnke M, Conlon M, McNeely JB, Anderson, GC. Effect of Nonnutritive Sucking on Behavioral State in Preterm Infants Before Feeding. Nurs Res 1988;37:347-50.
Lester BM, Tronick EZ. The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Pediatrics, 2004;113:631-99.
Kahraman A, Başbakkal Z, Yalaz M. Yenidoğan Konfor Davranış Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Uluslararası Hakemli Hemşirelik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2014;1:1-11.
Esin MN. Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları & veri toplama araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliği. in: Hemşirelikte araştırma süreç, uygulama ve kritik. Semra Erdoğan, Nursen Nahçıvan ve M. Nihal Esin Eds. İstanbul, Nobel. 2014, p.193-232.
Tavşancıl E. Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. 5. Baskı. Ankara:Nobel; 2014:19-51.
Butler S, Als H. Individualize Developmental Care Improves The Livess of Infants Born. Pediatrica, 2008;97:1173-75.
Peng NH, Bachman J, Jenkins R, Chen CH, Chang YC, Chang YS, Wang TM. Relationships Between Environmental Stressors and Stress Biobehavioral Responses of Preterm Infants in NICU. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2009;23:363-71.
Holditch-Davis D, Blackburn ST. Neurobehavioral Development. in Compherensive Neonatal Nursing Care. Carole Kenner and Judy Wright Lott Eds. 5.th ed, Newyork, Springer. 2014, pp. 689-721.
Van Dijk M, Roofthooft DW, Anand KJ, Guldemond F, Graaf J, Simons S, Jager Y, Goudoever JB, Tıbboel D. Taking up the Challenge of Measuring Prolonged Pain in (Premature) Neonates The COMFORTneo Scale Seems Promising. Clin J Pain 2009;25:607-16.
Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR, Ghahramanian A. Details of Content Validity and Objectifying it in Instrument Development. Nursing Practice Today 2014;1:163-71.
Harrison LL, Roanne C, Weaver M. The Relationship Between Physiological and Behavioral Measures of Stress in Preterm Infants. JOGNN 2004;33:236-45.
Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelikte Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;5:3-14.
Balcı A. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. 11. baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2015:111-46
Kılıç S. Kappa testi. Journal of Mood Disorders 2015;5:142-44.
Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Biyoistatistik. 15. Baskı. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınevi, 2012;190.
Hyrkasa K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechnerb K, Oksa L. Validating an Instrument for Clinical Supervision Using an Expert Panel. Int J Nurs Stud 2003;40:619-25.
Gözükara Bağ HG, Karabulut E, Alpar R. 2x2 tablolarda gözlemciler/ gözlemler arası uyumun değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2010;34:46-52.
Çam O, Baysan-Arabacı L. Tutum ölçeği hazırlamada nitel ve nicel adımlar. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2010;2:59-71.
Kubilay G Veri Toplama Yöntem ve Teknikleri in: Hemşirelikte Araştırma İlke, Süreç ve Yöntemleri. İnci Erefe Ed. İstanbul, Odak Ofset. 2002, p. 139-67.
Müller R, Büttner P. A Critical Discussion of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Statist Med 1994;13:2465-76.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Sibel Serap Ceylan

Bahire Bolışık

Publication Date

June 1, 2017

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA72CD53FU

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Ceylan SS, Bolışık B (June 1, 2017) Yenidoğan Stres Ölçeği’nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2 97–103.

EXAMINING PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF NEWBORN STRESS SCALE

Abstract

Keywords