Abstract
Background/Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of medical students about dating violence.
Methods: In the descriptive study, the universe was medical students of 1st-6th grade in a state university in Istanbul. A questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic questions (18 questions), Dating Violence Attitude Scale (DVAS), Dating Violence Perception Scale (DVPS) was sent to the participants by mobilephone via WhatApp.
Results: The median age of 339 students who answered the questionnaire was 21.0 (17.0-29.0). Of the students 61.4% (n=208) were women. The rates of students who used nicotine and alcohol were 53.4% (n=181) and 58.4% (n=198), respectively. Of the students 67.3% (n=228) had a dating relationship before, and 30.4% (n=103) had current relationship. Of the students had a dating relationship before, 23.7% (n=54) had experienced dating violence in their past relationship, and 14.6% (n=15) of the students who had a current dating relationship had experienced dating violence in their current relationship. Students who used nicotine and alcohol were exposed to a higher rate of dating violence. While the total scores of DVAS of women were higher than men, the total scores of DVPS were significantly lower (p<0.001 for both). Alcohol users had lower DVPS total scores than non-drinkers (p=0.004).
Conclusion: The rate of exposure to dating violence is high in medical students. Interventions are needed especially for groups at risk for exposure to dating violence. Qualitative and quantitative studies should be conducted to investigate the reasons why young people tend to violence.
Keywords
Dating Violence Medical Students Perception of Dating Violence Dating Violence Attitude Relationship
References
- 1. Intimate Partner Violence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preventing Teen Dating Violence. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html
- 2. World Health Organization. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women WHO clinical and policy guidelines. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85240/9789241548595_eng.pdf?sequence=1
- 3. Medina-Maldonado V, Del Mar Pastor-Bravo M, Vargas E, et al. Adolescent dating violence: Results of a mixed study in Quito, Ecuador. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(17-18):NP15205-NP15230. DOI: 10.1177/08862605211001471
- 4. Jennings WG, Okeem C, Piquero AR, et al. Dating and intimate partner violence among young persons ages 15–30: Evidence from a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017; 33, 107-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.007
- 5. Dikmen HA, Özaydın T and Yılmaz SD. Üniversitedeki kadın öğrencilerde yaşanan flört şiddeti ile anksiyete ve umutsuzluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg. 2018; 9(2):170-176. DOI: 10.31067/0.2018.9
- 6. Kütük EK, Gümüştaş F and Almiş BH. Üniversite öğrencisi kızlarda flört şiddetinin belirleyicileri ve psikiyatrik sonuçlar açısından flört dışı şiddetten farklılıkları. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2018; 19:217-222. DOI: 10.5455/apd.274195
- 7. Rivera-Rivera L, Allen-Leigh B, Rodríguez-Ortega G, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: baseline study of a cohort of 7,960 male and female Mexican public school students. Prev Med. 2007;44(6):477-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.020
- 8. Barros CR and Schraiber LB. Intimate partner violence reported by female and male users of healthcare units. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:7. DOI:10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006385
- 9. Straus MA. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008; 30(3), 252-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004
- 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preventing Teen Dating Violence. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teendatingviolence/fastfact.html.
- 11. Şenol A, Albayrak İ and Uluman Mert M. Flört şiddeti tutumlarının belirli değişkenler ve romantik ilişkilerde akılcı olmayan inançlara göre incelenmesi. JRES 2022; 9(1), 113-131. DOI: 10.51725/etad.1028491
- 12. Kılınçer AS and Dost MT. Perceived abuse in romantic relationships among university students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2014; 5(42):160-172.
- 13. Yumuşak A. Üniversite öğrencilerinin flört şiddetine yönelik tutumları, toplumsal cinsiyetçilik ve narsisistik kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki (Yüksek lisans tezi, Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Bilim Dalı). Tokat; 2013.
- 14. Açıkgöz B, Açıkgöz B, Karakoyun AR, et al. Evaluation of violence in flirtous relationships among 5th and 6th grade students in a faculty of medicine. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. 2018; 10(2):168-74. DOI: 10.18521/ktd.285138
- 15. Banyard VL and Cross C. Consequences of teen dating violence: understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women. 2008;14(9):998-1013. DOI: 10.1177/1077801208322058
- 16. Terzioğlu F, Gönenç İM, Özdemir F, et al. The validity and reliability of the dating violence scale. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 19(4), 225-232.
- 17. Toplu-Demirtaş E, Öztemür G and Fincham FD. Perceptions of Dating Violence: Assessment and Antecedents. J Interpers Violence 2022;37(1-2):NP48-NP75. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520914558
- 18. Sünetçi B, Say A, Gümüştepe B, et al. Üniversite öğrencilerinin flört şiddeti algıları üzerine bir araştırma. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi. 2016; 16(1), 56-83.
- 19. Calikoglu EO, Yerli EB and Tanriverdi E. Dating violence among university students: a cross-sectional study from Eastern Turkey. EJMI 2021; 5(1), 113. DOI: 10.14744/ejmi.2021.39890
- 20. Wincentak K, Connolly J and Card N. Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychol Violence 2017; 7(2): 224-241. DOI: 10.1037/a0040194
- 21. Díaz Olavarrieta C, Villa AR, Guerrero López B, et al. Dating violence among undergraduate medical students at a public university in Mexico City: an exploratory study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3104. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043104
- 22. Taquette SR and Monteiro DLM. Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: a systematic review. J Inj Violence Res, 2019;11(2):137-147. DOI: 10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1061
- 23. Barros CRS and Schairber LB. Intimate partner violence reported by female and male users of healthcare units. Rev Saude Publica. 2017; 51: 7. DOI: 10.1590/S15188787.2017051006385
- 24. İftar M and Güler G. Attitudes and behaviors of university students towards dating violence. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences 2020; 6(2),151-67.
- 25. Low S, Tiberio SS, Shortt JW, et al. Associations of couples’ intimate partner violence in young adulthood and substance use: A dyadic approach. Psychol Violence. 2017; 7(1), 120. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000038
- 26. Öztürk R, Mete D, Altıntaş M, et al. Sağlık bilimleri öğrencilerinin flört şiddeti tutumlarının şiddete karşı profesyonel rolleri ile ilişkisi. TJFMPC. 2021; 15(1),142-53. DOI: 10.21763/tjfmpc.807519
- 27. Santos DF, Castro DS, Lima EFA, et al.The women’s perception on the violence experienced. Rev Fund Care. 2017; 9(1):193-199. DOI: 10.9789/2175-5361.2017.v9i1.193-199
- 28. Çelik AK and Çelik SB. Ego in predicting dating violence in university students investigation of conditions and the role of early mismatched schemas. TEBD. 2022; 20(3), 911-29. DOI: 10.37217/tebd.1038390
- 29. Williams C, Richardson DS, Hammock GS, et al. Perceptions of physical and psychological aggression in close relationships: A review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(6), 489-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.005
- 30. Forty J. Do women with autonomy in the household experience less intimate partner violence in Malawi? Evidence from the 2015–16 Demographic and Health Survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2022; 54(6), 939-58. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932021000559
Abstract
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin flört şiddetine ilişkin algı ve tutumlarını değerlendirmektir.
Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı tipteki araştırmanın evrenini, İstanbul'da bir devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 1-6. sınıf tıp öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılara sosyodemografik sorular (18 soru), Flört Şiddeti Tutum Ölçeği (FŞTÖ), Flört Şiddeti Algısı Ölçeği'nden (FŞAÖ) oluşan bir anket cep telefonu aracılığıyla WhatApp aracılığıyla gönderildi.
Bulgular: Anketi yanıtlayan 339 öğrencinin ortanca yaşı 21.0 (17.0-29.0) idi. Öğrencilerin %61,4'ü (n=208) kadındı. Sigara ve alkol kullanan öğrencilerin oranları sırasıyla %53,4 (n=181) ve %58,4 (n=198) idi. Öğrencilerin %67,3'ünün (n=228) daha önce flört ilişkisi, %30,4'ünün (n=103) ise şu an ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. Daha önce flört ilişkisi olan öğrencilerin %23,7'si (n=54) önceki ilişkilerinde; halen flört ilişkisi olan öğrencilerin ise %14,6'sı (n=15) mevcut ilişkilerinde flört şiddeti yaşamıştı. Sigara ve alkol kullanan öğrenciler daha yüksek oranda flört şiddetine maruz kalmışlardı. Kadınların FŞTÖ toplam puanları erkeklerden yüksek iken, FŞTÖ toplam puanları anlamlı olarak düşüktü (her ikisi için de p<0.001). Alkol kullananların FŞAÖ toplam puanları, içmeyenlere göre daha düşüktü (p=0,004).
Sonuç: Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde flört şiddetine maruz kalma oranı yüksektir. Özellikle flört şiddetine maruz kalma riski taşıyan gruplar için müdahalelere ihtiyaç vardır. Gençlerin şiddete yönelme nedenlerinin araştırılması için nitel ve nicel araştırmalar yürütülmelidir.
References
- 1. Intimate Partner Violence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preventing Teen Dating Violence. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html
- 2. World Health Organization. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women WHO clinical and policy guidelines. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85240/9789241548595_eng.pdf?sequence=1
- 3. Medina-Maldonado V, Del Mar Pastor-Bravo M, Vargas E, et al. Adolescent dating violence: Results of a mixed study in Quito, Ecuador. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(17-18):NP15205-NP15230. DOI: 10.1177/08862605211001471
- 4. Jennings WG, Okeem C, Piquero AR, et al. Dating and intimate partner violence among young persons ages 15–30: Evidence from a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017; 33, 107-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.007
- 5. Dikmen HA, Özaydın T and Yılmaz SD. Üniversitedeki kadın öğrencilerde yaşanan flört şiddeti ile anksiyete ve umutsuzluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg. 2018; 9(2):170-176. DOI: 10.31067/0.2018.9
- 6. Kütük EK, Gümüştaş F and Almiş BH. Üniversite öğrencisi kızlarda flört şiddetinin belirleyicileri ve psikiyatrik sonuçlar açısından flört dışı şiddetten farklılıkları. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2018; 19:217-222. DOI: 10.5455/apd.274195
- 7. Rivera-Rivera L, Allen-Leigh B, Rodríguez-Ortega G, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: baseline study of a cohort of 7,960 male and female Mexican public school students. Prev Med. 2007;44(6):477-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.020
- 8. Barros CR and Schraiber LB. Intimate partner violence reported by female and male users of healthcare units. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:7. DOI:10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006385
- 9. Straus MA. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008; 30(3), 252-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004
- 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preventing Teen Dating Violence. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teendatingviolence/fastfact.html.
- 11. Şenol A, Albayrak İ and Uluman Mert M. Flört şiddeti tutumlarının belirli değişkenler ve romantik ilişkilerde akılcı olmayan inançlara göre incelenmesi. JRES 2022; 9(1), 113-131. DOI: 10.51725/etad.1028491
- 12. Kılınçer AS and Dost MT. Perceived abuse in romantic relationships among university students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2014; 5(42):160-172.
- 13. Yumuşak A. Üniversite öğrencilerinin flört şiddetine yönelik tutumları, toplumsal cinsiyetçilik ve narsisistik kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki (Yüksek lisans tezi, Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Bilim Dalı). Tokat; 2013.
- 14. Açıkgöz B, Açıkgöz B, Karakoyun AR, et al. Evaluation of violence in flirtous relationships among 5th and 6th grade students in a faculty of medicine. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. 2018; 10(2):168-74. DOI: 10.18521/ktd.285138
- 15. Banyard VL and Cross C. Consequences of teen dating violence: understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women. 2008;14(9):998-1013. DOI: 10.1177/1077801208322058
- 16. Terzioğlu F, Gönenç İM, Özdemir F, et al. The validity and reliability of the dating violence scale. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 19(4), 225-232.
- 17. Toplu-Demirtaş E, Öztemür G and Fincham FD. Perceptions of Dating Violence: Assessment and Antecedents. J Interpers Violence 2022;37(1-2):NP48-NP75. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520914558
- 18. Sünetçi B, Say A, Gümüştepe B, et al. Üniversite öğrencilerinin flört şiddeti algıları üzerine bir araştırma. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi. 2016; 16(1), 56-83.
- 19. Calikoglu EO, Yerli EB and Tanriverdi E. Dating violence among university students: a cross-sectional study from Eastern Turkey. EJMI 2021; 5(1), 113. DOI: 10.14744/ejmi.2021.39890
- 20. Wincentak K, Connolly J and Card N. Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychol Violence 2017; 7(2): 224-241. DOI: 10.1037/a0040194
- 21. Díaz Olavarrieta C, Villa AR, Guerrero López B, et al. Dating violence among undergraduate medical students at a public university in Mexico City: an exploratory study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3104. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043104
- 22. Taquette SR and Monteiro DLM. Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: a systematic review. J Inj Violence Res, 2019;11(2):137-147. DOI: 10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1061
- 23. Barros CRS and Schairber LB. Intimate partner violence reported by female and male users of healthcare units. Rev Saude Publica. 2017; 51: 7. DOI: 10.1590/S15188787.2017051006385
- 24. İftar M and Güler G. Attitudes and behaviors of university students towards dating violence. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences 2020; 6(2),151-67.
- 25. Low S, Tiberio SS, Shortt JW, et al. Associations of couples’ intimate partner violence in young adulthood and substance use: A dyadic approach. Psychol Violence. 2017; 7(1), 120. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000038
- 26. Öztürk R, Mete D, Altıntaş M, et al. Sağlık bilimleri öğrencilerinin flört şiddeti tutumlarının şiddete karşı profesyonel rolleri ile ilişkisi. TJFMPC. 2021; 15(1),142-53. DOI: 10.21763/tjfmpc.807519
- 27. Santos DF, Castro DS, Lima EFA, et al.The women’s perception on the violence experienced. Rev Fund Care. 2017; 9(1):193-199. DOI: 10.9789/2175-5361.2017.v9i1.193-199
- 28. Çelik AK and Çelik SB. Ego in predicting dating violence in university students investigation of conditions and the role of early mismatched schemas. TEBD. 2022; 20(3), 911-29. DOI: 10.37217/tebd.1038390
- 29. Williams C, Richardson DS, Hammock GS, et al. Perceptions of physical and psychological aggression in close relationships: A review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(6), 489-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.005
- 30. Forty J. Do women with autonomy in the household experience less intimate partner violence in Malawi? Evidence from the 2015–16 Demographic and Health Survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2022; 54(6), 939-58. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932021000559
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Public Health, Environmental Health |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Early Pub Date | March 27, 2024 |
| Publication Date | April 1, 2024 |
| Submission Date | March 19, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 |