Validity Andt Reliability of The Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire In Turkish

Number: 3 September 1, 2014
  • Eylem Paslı Gürdoğan
  • Şule Ecevit Alpar
EN TR

Validity Andt Reliability of The Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire In Turkish

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical governance climate has an important role in providing the organizational development. This study was planned to determine the validity and reliability of the “Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire” to bring in to the nursing literature . Patients and methods: This study is methodological. The data were collected with “ Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire CGCQ ” which was developed by Freeman. Study was performed with 200 nurses working in a university hospital. In the validity and reliability of the scale, the validity of language, content validity, item analyses, internal consistency and test-retest methods were used. Results: The language and content validity of the scale was provided. Item analyzes of CGCQ’s outcomes showed that the distinctive to the features of each items. As a result of the analysis to determine the internal consistency, cronbach’s alpha coefficient was found to be higher α=0.89 . The computed test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.94. Conclusion: As a result of the analyses it was found CGCQ is a valid and reliable scale to be used in Turkish society

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Som CV. Clinical governance: a fresh look at its defination, Clinical Governance: An International Journal 2004; 9:87-90.
  2. 2. McSherry R, Wadding A, Pearce P. Healthcare Governance Through Effective Leadership, In: Effective Health Care Leadership. M. Jasper, M. Jumaa (Eds), 2.Edition, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2008; 58-72.
  3. 3. Halligan A, Donaldson L. Implementing clinical governance: turning vision into reality, BMJ Clinical Research 2001; 322:1413-7.
  4. 4. Freeman T. Measuring progress in clinical governance: asssessing the reliability and validity of the Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire, Health Services Management Research 2003;16:234-50.
  5. 5. Murray J, Rayner HF, Fine H, Karia N, Sweetingham R. “What do NHS staff think and know about cilinical governance?” Clinical Governance: An International Journal 2004; 9:172-80.
  6. 6. Karassavidou E, Glaveli N, Zafiropoulos K. Assessing hospital’s readiness for clinşcal governance quality initiatives through organizational climate, Journal of Health Organization and Management 2011;25:214-40.
  7. 7. Mok EA, Yeung B. Relationship between organizational climate and empowerment of nurses in Hong kong. Journal of Nursing Programs 2002; 10:129-37.
  8. 8. Burton MR, Loritsen J, Obel B. The impact of organizational climate and strategic fit on firm performance, Human Research Management 2004; 43:67-82.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Eylem Paslı Gürdoğan

Şule Ecevit Alpar

Publication Date

September 1, 2014

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Number: 3

EndNote
Gürdoğan EP, Alpar ŞE (September 1, 2014) Klinik Yönetişim İklimi Ölçeğinin KYİÖ Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3 229–235.