One of the primary elements of continued professionalism in nursing is undoubtedly the need to keep abreast of the science evolving and the scientific methods used to evaluate the progress. Research is one of the most fundamental tools of scientific development. In this review, is examined how the use of research in continuing nursing professionalism, both in other nations as well as in Turkey, has evolved historically and how developments in the science and pratice of nursing have influenced the rise of and need for continual research in nursing.
1. Öztürk A, Kaya N, Ayık S, Uygur E, Cengiz A. Hemşirelik uygulamalarında araştırma sonuçlarının kullanımında engeller. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg 2010; 18: 144-55.
2. Bayık A. Hemşirelik disiplini ve araştırma. Erefe İ.(editör) Hemşirelikte Araştırma İlke Süreç ve Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Odak Ofset, 2002; 13-26.
3. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence Nursing Practice. 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2008.
4. Nahcivan NO. Hemşirelik araştırmalarının uygulamada kullanımında adımlar ve stratejiler. I. Uluslararası & V. Ulusal Hemşirelik Eğitimi Kongresi Kitabı. İstanbul: Özlem Grafik Matbaacılık, 2003; 47-54.
5. Nursing Research in Europe. Scoping Report. http://www.isciii.es/ ISCIII/es/contenidos/fd-el-instituto/fd-organizacion/fd-estructuradirectiva/fd-subdireccion-general-redes-centros-investigacion2/ fd-centros-unidades2/fd-investen-isciii-2/docus/investen_ NursingResearchInEurope.pdf
6. Hackmann M. Development of nursing research in Germany in the European context. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2000;6:222–8.
7. Seçginli S. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Kullanımı ve Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin N. (editör) Hemşirelikte Araştırma Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2015; 335-58.
8. Burns N, Grove SK. The Evolution of Research in Nursing. Burns N, Grove SK. (editors) The Pracrice of Nursing Research Conduct, Critique, and Utilization 5th edition. USA: Elsevier, 2005; 16-21.
9. Palmer IS. Florence Nightingale: Reformer, reactionary, researcher. Nursing Research 1977; 26: 84-9.
10. Herbert RG. Florence Nightingale: Saint, reformer or rebel? Malabar FL: : Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
11. Sarkıs JM, Conners VL. Nursing Research: Historical Background and Teaching Information Strategies. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 1986;74:121-5.
12. Türk Hemşireler Derneği. ICN-International Council of NursesUluslararası Hemşirelik Konseyi. http://www.turkhemsirelerdernegi. org.tr/tr/thd/ilgili-kuruluslar/uluslararasi-hemsirelik-kuruluslari/icninternational-council-of-nurses.aspx
13. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003; 3-22.
14. Rebar CR, Gersch CJ, Macnee CL, McCabe S. Understanding Nursing Research Using Research Evidence-Based Practice. 3th edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011;1-21.
15. Introduction to Nursing Research. http://health.prenhall.com/ nieswiadomy/pdf/NIESWIADOMY1.pdf
16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 7th Edition. China: Wolters Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010; 3-32.
17. Werley HH. Nursing research in perspective. International Nursing Rewiev 1977; 24: 75-83.
18. Gortner SR, Nahm H. An overview of nursing research in the United States. Nursing Research 1977; 26, 10-33.
19. Salvage J. Nursing in Europe: A Resource for Better Health. WHO Regional Office Europe, 1997. Ss.110-7.
20. Ketefian S, McKenna HP. Doctoral Education in Nursing: International Perspectives. Psychology Press, 2005: 28-32.
21. Jacox A. Strategies to promote nursing research. Nursing Research 1980; 29, 213-8.
22. McKenna H, Cutcliffe J. Nursing Doctoral Education in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The Online Journal of Issues of Nursing. 2001; 6. http://www.nursingworld.org/ MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/ TableofContents/Volume62001/No2May01/ArticlePreviousTopic/ UKandIrelandDoctoralEducation.html
23. Carlson-Catalano J, Lunney M. Quantitative methods for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses. Clinical Nurse Specialist
24. The History of Nursing Research. http://downloads.lww.com/ wolterskluwer_vitalstream_com/sample-content/9781496300232_ Polit10e/samples/Polit10e_CS_Ch01.pdf
26. Stetler CB. Refinement of the Stetler/Marram model for application of research findings to practice. Nursing Outlook 1994; 42: 15-25.
27. Stetler CB: Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nursing Outlook 2001; 49:272-9.
28. Horsley JA, Crane J, Crabtree MK, Wood DJ. Using research to improve nursing practice: A guide; CURN Project. New York: Grune & Stratton.
29. Rettig R. History, development, and importance to nursing of outcomes research. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance 1991;5:13-7.
30. Kaynak E. The Cochrane Library. https://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/ images/Ulakbim/cochrane.ppt
31. Brown SJ. Knowledge for healthcare practice: A guide to using research evidence. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
32. Craig JV, Smyth RL. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
33. Omery A, Williams RP. An appraisal of research utilization across the United States. Journal of Nursing Administration 1999; 29: 50-6.
34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2000. Washington DC: Author, 1992.
35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Washington DC: Author, 2000.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020 topics and objectives. Washington DC: Author, 2014.
37. Gray JR, Grove SK, Burns N. The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. 7 th Edition. Riverport Lane: Elsevier, 2013.
38. Şentürk SE. Hemşirelik Tarihi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2011;93-4.
39. Güneş Ü, Demir Y, Eşer İ, Khorshid L. Papers presented by nurses at scientific events in Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences 2008; 5: 1-11.
40. Velioğlu P, Oktay S. Türkiye’de hemşirelik araştırmalarına tarihsel açıdan kısa bir bakış. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Dergisi 1999; 1: 5-12.
41. Özsoy SA. The struggle to develop nursing research in Turkey. International Council of Nurses 2007: 243-8.
42. Türk Hemşireler Dergisi. http://www.turkhemsirelerdernegi.org.tr/ menu/hemsirelik-yayinlari/dergi-bulten/168-dergi.aspx
43. Ergöl Ş. Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimde Hemşirelik Eğitimi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 2011; 1: 152-5.
44. Geçmişten Günümüze SANERC. https://sanerc.ku.edu.tr/history
45. Semahat Arsel Hemşirelik Eğitim ve Araştırma Merkezi (SANERC) Etkinlikler & Duyurular. https://sanerc.ku.edu.tr/
46. HEMARGE. http://hemarge.org.tr/
47. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi Editörden. file:///C:/ Users/Hp/Downloads/5000152190-5000251427-1-PB.pdf.
48. Yılmaz Gören Ş, Yalım NY. Ulusal hemşirelik dergilerinin araştırma ve yayın etiği politikalarının dergi internet siteleri üzerinden incelenmesi Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 2015: 137-54.
Hemşirelikte profesyonelleşmenin başta gelen koşulu kuşkusuz bilimi ve bilimsel yöntemi yeterince anlamak ve mesleğe yansıtmaktır. Araştırma bilimsel gelişmenin en temel aracıdır. Bu derlemede hem dünya genelinde hem de Türkiye’de hemşirelikte araştırma kullanımının tarihsel süreçte hangi aşamalardan geçtiği ve hemşirelik adına yapılan gelişmelerin hemşirelikte araştırma kullanımını nasıl etkilediği tartışılmıştır
1. Öztürk A, Kaya N, Ayık S, Uygur E, Cengiz A. Hemşirelik uygulamalarında araştırma sonuçlarının kullanımında engeller. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg 2010; 18: 144-55.
2. Bayık A. Hemşirelik disiplini ve araştırma. Erefe İ.(editör) Hemşirelikte Araştırma İlke Süreç ve Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Odak Ofset, 2002; 13-26.
3. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence Nursing Practice. 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2008.
4. Nahcivan NO. Hemşirelik araştırmalarının uygulamada kullanımında adımlar ve stratejiler. I. Uluslararası & V. Ulusal Hemşirelik Eğitimi Kongresi Kitabı. İstanbul: Özlem Grafik Matbaacılık, 2003; 47-54.
5. Nursing Research in Europe. Scoping Report. http://www.isciii.es/ ISCIII/es/contenidos/fd-el-instituto/fd-organizacion/fd-estructuradirectiva/fd-subdireccion-general-redes-centros-investigacion2/ fd-centros-unidades2/fd-investen-isciii-2/docus/investen_ NursingResearchInEurope.pdf
6. Hackmann M. Development of nursing research in Germany in the European context. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2000;6:222–8.
7. Seçginli S. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Kullanımı ve Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin N. (editör) Hemşirelikte Araştırma Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2015; 335-58.
8. Burns N, Grove SK. The Evolution of Research in Nursing. Burns N, Grove SK. (editors) The Pracrice of Nursing Research Conduct, Critique, and Utilization 5th edition. USA: Elsevier, 2005; 16-21.
9. Palmer IS. Florence Nightingale: Reformer, reactionary, researcher. Nursing Research 1977; 26: 84-9.
10. Herbert RG. Florence Nightingale: Saint, reformer or rebel? Malabar FL: : Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
11. Sarkıs JM, Conners VL. Nursing Research: Historical Background and Teaching Information Strategies. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 1986;74:121-5.
12. Türk Hemşireler Derneği. ICN-International Council of NursesUluslararası Hemşirelik Konseyi. http://www.turkhemsirelerdernegi. org.tr/tr/thd/ilgili-kuruluslar/uluslararasi-hemsirelik-kuruluslari/icninternational-council-of-nurses.aspx
13. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003; 3-22.
14. Rebar CR, Gersch CJ, Macnee CL, McCabe S. Understanding Nursing Research Using Research Evidence-Based Practice. 3th edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011;1-21.
15. Introduction to Nursing Research. http://health.prenhall.com/ nieswiadomy/pdf/NIESWIADOMY1.pdf
16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 7th Edition. China: Wolters Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010; 3-32.
17. Werley HH. Nursing research in perspective. International Nursing Rewiev 1977; 24: 75-83.
18. Gortner SR, Nahm H. An overview of nursing research in the United States. Nursing Research 1977; 26, 10-33.
19. Salvage J. Nursing in Europe: A Resource for Better Health. WHO Regional Office Europe, 1997. Ss.110-7.
20. Ketefian S, McKenna HP. Doctoral Education in Nursing: International Perspectives. Psychology Press, 2005: 28-32.
21. Jacox A. Strategies to promote nursing research. Nursing Research 1980; 29, 213-8.
22. McKenna H, Cutcliffe J. Nursing Doctoral Education in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The Online Journal of Issues of Nursing. 2001; 6. http://www.nursingworld.org/ MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/ TableofContents/Volume62001/No2May01/ArticlePreviousTopic/ UKandIrelandDoctoralEducation.html
23. Carlson-Catalano J, Lunney M. Quantitative methods for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses. Clinical Nurse Specialist
24. The History of Nursing Research. http://downloads.lww.com/ wolterskluwer_vitalstream_com/sample-content/9781496300232_ Polit10e/samples/Polit10e_CS_Ch01.pdf
26. Stetler CB. Refinement of the Stetler/Marram model for application of research findings to practice. Nursing Outlook 1994; 42: 15-25.
27. Stetler CB: Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nursing Outlook 2001; 49:272-9.
28. Horsley JA, Crane J, Crabtree MK, Wood DJ. Using research to improve nursing practice: A guide; CURN Project. New York: Grune & Stratton.
29. Rettig R. History, development, and importance to nursing of outcomes research. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance 1991;5:13-7.
30. Kaynak E. The Cochrane Library. https://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/ images/Ulakbim/cochrane.ppt
31. Brown SJ. Knowledge for healthcare practice: A guide to using research evidence. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
32. Craig JV, Smyth RL. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
33. Omery A, Williams RP. An appraisal of research utilization across the United States. Journal of Nursing Administration 1999; 29: 50-6.
34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2000. Washington DC: Author, 1992.
35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Washington DC: Author, 2000.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020 topics and objectives. Washington DC: Author, 2014.
37. Gray JR, Grove SK, Burns N. The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. 7 th Edition. Riverport Lane: Elsevier, 2013.
38. Şentürk SE. Hemşirelik Tarihi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2011;93-4.
39. Güneş Ü, Demir Y, Eşer İ, Khorshid L. Papers presented by nurses at scientific events in Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences 2008; 5: 1-11.
40. Velioğlu P, Oktay S. Türkiye’de hemşirelik araştırmalarına tarihsel açıdan kısa bir bakış. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Dergisi 1999; 1: 5-12.
41. Özsoy SA. The struggle to develop nursing research in Turkey. International Council of Nurses 2007: 243-8.
42. Türk Hemşireler Dergisi. http://www.turkhemsirelerdernegi.org.tr/ menu/hemsirelik-yayinlari/dergi-bulten/168-dergi.aspx
43. Ergöl Ş. Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimde Hemşirelik Eğitimi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 2011; 1: 152-5.
44. Geçmişten Günümüze SANERC. https://sanerc.ku.edu.tr/history
45. Semahat Arsel Hemşirelik Eğitim ve Araştırma Merkezi (SANERC) Etkinlikler & Duyurular. https://sanerc.ku.edu.tr/
46. HEMARGE. http://hemarge.org.tr/
47. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi Editörden. file:///C:/ Users/Hp/Downloads/5000152190-5000251427-1-PB.pdf.
48. Yılmaz Gören Ş, Yalım NY. Ulusal hemşirelik dergilerinin araştırma ve yayın etiği politikalarının dergi internet siteleri üzerinden incelenmesi Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 2015: 137-54.